Where health and welfare meet: social deprivation among patients in the emergency department

JA Gordon, CR Chudnofsky, RA Hayward - Journal of Urban Health, 2001 - Springer
JA Gordon, CR Chudnofsky, RA Hayward
Journal of Urban Health, 2001Springer
Context As a safety net provider for many disadvantaged Americans, the emergency
department (ED) may be an efficient site not only for providing acute medical care, but also
for addressing serious social needs. Objective To characterize the social needs of ED
patients, and to evaluate whether the most disadvantaged patients have connections with
the health and welfare system outside the ED. Design Cross-sectional survey conducted
over 24 hours in the fall of 1997. Setting Three EDs: an urban public teaching hospital, a …
Context
As a safety net provider for many disadvantaged Americans, the emergency department (ED) may be an efficient site not only for providing acute medical care, but also for addressing serious social needs.
Objective
To characterize the social needs of ED patients, and to evaluate whether the most disadvantaged patients have connections with the health and welfare system outside the ED.
Design
Cross-sectional survey conducted over 24 hours in the fall of 1997.
Setting
Three EDs: an urban public teaching hospital, a suburban university hospital, and a semirural community hospital.
Participants
Consecutive patients presenting for care, including those transported by ambulance. The survey response rate was 91% (N=300; urban=115, suburban=102, rural=83).
Main Outcome Measure
Index of socioeconomic deprivation described by the US Census Bureau (based on food, housing, and utilities).
Results
Of all ED patients, 31% reported one or more serious social deprivations. For example, 13% of urban patients reported not having enough food to eat, and 9% of rural patients reported disconnection of their gas or electricity (US population averages both less than 3%). While 40% of all patients had no consistent health care outside the ED (≤1 visit/year), those with higher levels of social deprivation had the least contact with the health care system outside the ED (P<.01). Although those with higher levels of deprivation were more likely to receive public assistance, still almost one-quarter of patients with high-level social deprivation were not receiving public aid.
Conclusion
Many ED patients suffer from fundamental social deprivations that threaten basic health. The most disadvantaged of these patients frequently lack contact with other medical care sites or public assistance networks. Community efforts to address serious social deprivation should include partnerships with the local ED.
Springer