[PDF][PDF] Managing love and death at the zoo: The biopolitics of endangered species preservation

M Chrulew - Australian Humanities Review, 2011 - press-files.anu.edu.au
M Chrulew
Australian Humanities Review, 2011press-files.anu.edu.au
The 24 May 1968 issue of Time magazine featured a short article with the title 'Animal
Behavior: Love at the Zoo'. Its topic was the breeding of animals in zoological gardens, but
unlike the puff pieces featuring neonate mammals routinely fed to media by zoo publicity
departments today, this story sought to highlight the unique dilemmas encountered on the
way to such happy successes. It may not have broached the precise mechanics of rhino
husbandry or the numbers of elephant miscarriages, but it did recount the frustrations of …
The 24 May 1968 issue of Time magazine featured a short article with the title ‘Animal Behavior: Love at the Zoo’. Its topic was the breeding of animals in zoological gardens, but unlike the puff pieces featuring neonate mammals routinely fed to media by zoo publicity departments today, this story sought to highlight the unique dilemmas encountered on the way to such happy successes. It may not have broached the precise mechanics of rhino husbandry or the numbers of elephant miscarriages, but it did recount the frustrations of managing reproduction in these peculiar institutions, from storks, emus and tortoises attempting to mate with their caretakers, to the dangers of provoking a lion’s jealousy. Zoos’ insistence on absolute visibility has often revealed elements of animal sexuality disruptive of their bourgeois tranquillity, but these even more unseemly behind-the-scenes anecdotes, from the ‘embarrassing’to the ‘pathetic’, expose the extent to which, behind their facade of naturalism, zoological gardens control all aspects of animal life, not only diet and habitat but even the tawdry details of procreation divulged here with such obvious delight.
Given this situation of utter dominance, we can hardly take the article’s closing advice to zookeepers with anything but irony. To prevent from being harmed by ‘impudent’captives, it is suggested that one ‘assume a super-alpha status’—a position of ultra-authority naturalised as an extension of animals’ innate need for hierarchy. Of course, attacks by animals potentially expose zoo workers and overeager visitors to grave injury, but such acts (just like refusal to breed) are the last form of resistance available to a caste of creatures entirely at the whim of their kindly protectors, sheltered in artificial, regimented enclosures, whose emblematic behaviour was for a long time the stereotyped pacing of a neurotic. In our historical moment of planetary imperialism, mass extinctions and anthropogenic climate change, the natural world is said to have been ‘completely absorb [ed]’by a rationalising culture (Adorno 115). Zoological gardens, where living animals are displayed for the edification of human visitors, are for many the very epitome of this process, the animals within a ‘living monument to their own disappearance’(Berger 24). It is safe to say that ‘super-alpha status’ has long since been assumed—and achieved.
press-files.anu.edu.au