Technology and Culture
Volume 42, Number 2, April 2001
E-ISSN: 1097-3729 Print ISSN: 0040-165X
DOI: 10.1353/tech.2001.0076
E-ISSN: 1097-3729 Print ISSN: 0040-165X
DOI: 10.1353/tech.2001.0076
McCray, Patrick (W. Patrick)
What Makes a Failure? Designing a New National Telescope, 1975-1984
Technology and Culture - Volume 42, Number 2, April 2001, pp. 265-291
The Johns Hopkins University Press
Patrick (W. Patrick) McCray - What Makes a Failure? Designing a New
National Telescope, 1975-1984 - Technology and Culture 42:2 Technology
and Culture 42.2 (2001) 265-291 What Makes a
Failure?Designing a New National Telescope, 1975-1984 W. Patrick McCray
[Figures] For an expert community, choosing the design of a new
technology is not as simple as running a cost-benefit analysis on the
available options. During the decision-making process, members of the
communities involved learn what is feasible, educate each other, and
articulate their priorities as they move toward a solution. Historians,
sociologists, anthropologists, and policy makers have begun to produce
a body of literature that investigates the process and motives at work
when a scientific or technological community wrestles with an important
project's early stages. During the 1970s and 1980s, American
astronomers, engineers, and science administrators formed such a
decision-making community as they debated the design and use of larger
telescopes, including a new national telescope. They balanced science
goals against technological possibilities and they weighed the
intellectual well-being of the entire astronomy community against the
desires of individuals and institutions. In the end, they made perhaps
the toughest choice of all: not to build. Did that decision signal failure? A closer look suggests otherwise, that the ultimate
success or failure of a big technological project must be...