SubStance
Issue 96 (Volume 30, Number 3), 2001
E-ISSN: 1527-2095 Print ISSN: 0049-2426
DOI: 10.1353/sub.2001.0033
E-ISSN: 1527-2095 Print ISSN: 0049-2426
DOI: 10.1353/sub.2001.0033
Paulson, William R., 1955-
For a Cosmopolitical Philology: Lessons from Science Studies
SubStance - Issue 96 (Volume 30, Number 3), 2001, pp. 101-119
University of Wisconsin Press
William R. Paulson - For a Cosmopolitical Philology: Lessons from
Science Studies - SubStance 30:3 SubStance 30.3 (2001) 101-119 For a Cosmopolitical Philology: Lessons from Science
Studies William Paulson The gradual institutionalization of "literature
and science" as an academic subspecialty should not obscure the fact
that its raison d'être is by no means obvious or settled. This is not a
criticism: one of the field's advantages, at a time when
"interdisciplinarity" has become a mind-numbing administrative cliché,
should be that of provoking new thought about fundamental questions by
forcing its practitioners to confront both the problems and
possibilities of its unlikely coupling. The present paper is an attempt
to contribute to this project by answering the question "what can the
literary disciplines learn from science studies?" One crucial reason
for doing "literature and science," at least for those of us on the
literary side, is to help literary studies -- or philology, as I prefer
to say -- fit into a world where nonhuman things matter, not least
because science and technology are restructuring the human parts of the
world by acting on the nonhuman ones. As soon as we leave the terrain
of literary formalism and want to consider contexts, we encounter
science, its objects, and its effects. It is therefore worth trying to
understand how science, technology, and the things they work on are
connected to (and indeed form an integral part of)...