Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture
Volume 36, 2007
E-ISSN: 1938-6133 Print ISSN: 0360-2370
DOI: 10.1353/sec.2007.0013
E-ISSN: 1938-6133 Print ISSN: 0360-2370
DOI: 10.1353/sec.2007.0013
Rosenberg, Daniel, 1966-
Joseph Priestley and the Graphic Invention of Modern Time
Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture - Volume 36, 2007, pp. 55-103
The Johns Hopkins University Press
Daniel Rosenberg - Joseph Priestley and the Graphic Invention of Modern
Time - Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture 36:1 Studies in Eighteenth
Century Culture 36.1 (2007) 55-103 Muse Search Journals This Journal
Contents Joseph Priestley and the Graphic
Invention of Modern Time Daniel Rosenberg Labitur et labetur in omne
volubilis aevum In historiography, the idea of time is expressed
through a variety of figures, not the least of which is the line.
Indeed, in temporal representation in general, the linear metaphor
appears virtually everywhere. As W. J. T. Mitchell and others have
argued, much of the language that we use to talk about time already
implies this turn. In visual art, the same holds true: from the most
ancient images of time to the most modern, the line appears as a
central figure. The linear metaphor is ubiquitous in everyday visual
representations, too, in almanacs, calendars, charts, and graphs of all
sorts. So it comes as something of a surprise to discover that it was
only quite recently that scholars first thought to represent
chronological relationships among historical events by placing them on
a measured timeline. This fact is not only surprising in retrospect: in
the 1750s and 60s, when the modern timeline was first introduced,
observers found it equally strange. Certainly, there was no technical
reason why a regular timeline could not have been created earlier.
Technologies of printing had long been available, as had techniques...