Philosophy and Literature
Volume 21, Number 2, October 1997
E-ISSN: 1086-329X Print ISSN: 0190-0013
DOI: 10.1353/phl.1997.0037
E-ISSN: 1086-329X Print ISSN: 0190-0013
DOI: 10.1353/phl.1997.0037
Cohen, Ted.
Metaphor, Feeling, and Narrative
Philosophy and Literature - Volume 21, Number 2, October 1997, pp. 223-244
The Johns Hopkins University Press
Ted Cohen - Metaphor, Feeling, and Narrative - Philosophy and
Literature 21:2 Philosophy and Literature 21.2 (1997) 223-244 Metaphor,
Feeling, and Narrative Ted Cohen I This essay rests on at least four
assumptions, none of which will be defended. I begin by setting out
these four as clearly as I can, along with some explanation of why I
offer no defense of them. (1) There is no infallible sign that any
given expression, spoken or written, is a metaphor. Until about twenty
years ago it was commonly supposed that a necessary condition of
something's being a metaphor is that if taken literally it be absurd or
self-contradictory or at least blatantly false. This would not have
been a sufficient condition, of course, but it was thought to be
necessary. It was my privilege to note that a metaphor need display no
logical or semantic anomaly, and that indeed a metaphor taken literally
need not even be false. I promptly went on to the mistaken assertion
that there must be some way in which metaphors are recognized, that
every metaphorical expression must exhibit some anomaly if taken
literally, although the oddity might be only pragmatic. I concluded
that every metaphor taken literally must be something that, in the
circumstances, the speaker or writer could not mean. Thus if the
metaphor were a literal truth, like "Sydney is a warm city" or "No man
is an island," the literal truth would be so obvious in the
circumstances that one could not suppose the author...