New Literary History
Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 1999
E-ISSN: 1080-661X Print ISSN: 0028-6087
DOI: 10.1353/nlh.1999.0026
E-ISSN: 1080-661X Print ISSN: 0028-6087
DOI: 10.1353/nlh.1999.0026
Lefebvre, Martin.
On Memory and Imagination in the Cinema
New Literary History - Volume 30, Number 2, Spring 1999, pp. 479-498
The Johns Hopkins University Press
Martin Lefebvre - On Memory and Imagination in the Cinema - New
Literary History 30:2 New Literary History 30.2 (1999) 479-498 On
Memory and Imagination in the Cinema * Martin Lefebvre In animo sit
quidquid est in memoria Augustine (Confessions 10.17) Memory and
Imagination It is undeniable that memory, in the larger sense of the
term, plays an important role in the act of spectating (the act of
watching a film). For example, in order to construct a narrative form
and comprehend the characters' actions, the spectator must be able to
recall faces, places, and situations from one segment of a film to
another. Further, cognitive science has shown us how greatly the
understanding of discursive forms depends on prior knowledge, memorized
through such knowledge structures as frames, scripts, MOPs (Memory
Organization Packets), and so on. As a result, it is becoming more and
more difficult for semioticians to conceive of memory outside the
artificial intelligence paradigm. But one must be careful not to reduce
memory in its totality to this model, which accounts only partially for
the work done by human memory and for its semiotic or representational
function. In fact, computer memory does not represent, it re-presents
or reproduces data. Information stored in computer memory is stable and
not subject to transformation. In contrast, human memory can represent,
that is it can translate data into a semiotic system and, by the same
token, transform it and render...