Journal of Film and Video
Volume 60, Number 2, Summer 2008
E-ISSN: 1934-6018 Print ISSN: 0742-4671
DOI: 10.1353/jfv.0.0005
E-ISSN: 1934-6018 Print ISSN: 0742-4671
DOI: 10.1353/jfv.0.0005
Jay Ruby
A Future for Ethnographic Film?
Journal of Film and Video - Volume 60, Number 2, Summer 2008, pp. 5-14
University of Illinois Press
Project MUSE - Journal of Film and Video - A Future for Ethnographic
Film? Project MUSE Journals Journal of Film and Video Volume 60, Number
2, Summer 2008 A Future for Ethnographic Film? Journal of Film and
Video Volume 60, Number 2, Summer 2008 E-ISSN: 1934-6018 Print ISSN:
0742-4671 DOI: 10.1353/jfv.0.0005 A Future for Ethnographic Film? Jay
Ruby Ethnographic film is a contested genre, not unlike the
documentary. The majority opinion is that an ethnographic film is any
documentary that focuses on non-Western people (see Heider). The
adjective "ethnographic" is used in a very loose manner, similar to the
way psychological or historical is applied to a film. Few people expect
a psychological film to be a serious rendering of the constructs of
psychology or for the maker of the film to be a professionally trained
psychologist. As a consequence, many films screened at places such as
the American Anthropological Association or the Margaret Mead festival
are documentaries made by professional filmmakers who have little or no
training in anthropology. I have argued for a more restricted
approach -- one that confines the genre to the work of academic
anthropologists. In my book Picturing Culture, I articulated a fantasy
version of this position. To begin . . . a moral tale for
anthropologists, a fantasy in which an anthropological cinema
exists -- not documentaries about "anthropological" subjects, but films
designed by anthropologists to communicate...