Journal of Democracy
Volume 11, Number 4, October 2000
E-ISSN: 1086-3214 Print ISSN: 1045-5736
DOI: 10.1353/jod.2000.0088
E-ISSN: 1086-3214 Print ISSN: 1045-5736
DOI: 10.1353/jod.2000.0088
Stepan, Alfred C.
Religion, Democracy, and the "Twin Tolerations"
Journal of Democracy - Volume 11, Number 4, October 2000, pp. 37-57
The Johns Hopkins University Press
Alfred C. Stepan - Religion, Democracy, and the "Twin Tolerations" -
Journal of Democracy 11:4 Journal of Democracy 11.4 (2000) 37-57
Religion, Democracy, and the "Twin Tolerations"
Alfred Stepan [Tables] Are all, or only some, of the world's religious
systems politically compatible with democracy? This is, of course, one
of the most important and heatedly debated questions of our times. My
goal is to contribute to this debate from the perspective of
comparative politics. More specifically, as a specialist in political
institutions and democratization, I intend to discuss three questions,
the answers to which should improve our understanding of this critical
issue. First, what are the minimal institutional and political
requirements that a polity must satisfy before it can be considered a
democracy? Building on this analysis, what can we then infer about the
need for the "twin tolerations"--that is, the minimal boundaries of
freedom of action that must somehow be crafted for political
institutions vis-à-vis religious authorities, and for religious
individuals and groups vis-à-vis political institutions? Second, how
have a set of longstanding democracies -- the 15 countries in the
European Union (EU)--actually met these requirements, and what
influential misinterpretations of the Western European experience with
religion and democracy must we avoid? Third, what are the implications
of the answers to our first two questions for polities heavily...