Journal of Democracy
Volume 6, Number 3, July 1995
E-ISSN: 1086-3214 Print ISSN: 1045-5736
DOI: 10.1353/jod.1995.0053
E-ISSN: 1086-3214 Print ISSN: 1045-5736
DOI: 10.1353/jod.1995.0053
Payne, Rodger A.
Freedom and the Environment
Journal of Democracy - Volume 6, Number 3, July 1995, pp. 41-55
The Johns Hopkins University Press
Rodger A. Payne - Freedom and the Environment - Journal of Democracy
6:3 Journal of Democracy 6.3 (1995) 41-55 Freedom and the Environment
Rodger A. Payne Since Kant, liberals have argued that a world filled
with democracies would suffer fewer wars. Remarkably, a growing body of
historical scholarship confirms that democratic states have not fought
one another. A burgeoning literature now seeks to explain why this
peace results. The present essay explores a different, though related,
theme by asking whether democratization portends still other unforeseen
but propitious consequences for the community of nations. Specifically,
do democratic states take better care of the environment? In
articulating their support for global democratization, U.S. political
leaders have linked democracy and the environment. For example,
then-candidate Bill Clinton boasted during the 1992 presidential
campaign that democracies, among their other virtues, "are more likely
to . . . protect the global environment." In his 1992 bestseller Earth
in the Balance, Clinton's running mate Albert Gore, Jr., claimed that
the spread of democracy is a prerequisite for the achievement of better
environmental policies. Even before the extent and intensity of
ecological damage in the former Soviet bloc became widely known, the
scholar H.J. McCloskey agreed with the politicians. As he wrote in
1983: Many of the important ecological measures that are being
implemented are being implemented in...