ELH
Volume 67, Number 1, Spring 2000
E-ISSN: 1080-6547 Print ISSN: 0013-8304
DOI: 10.1353/elh.2000.0003
E-ISSN: 1080-6547 Print ISSN: 0013-8304
DOI: 10.1353/elh.2000.0003
Goodlad, Lauren M. E.
'A Middle Class Cut into Two': Historiography and Victorian National Character
ELH - Volume 67, Number 1, Spring 2000, pp. 143-178
The Johns Hopkins University Press
Lauren M. E. Goodlad - 'A Middle Class Cut into Two': Historiography
and Victorian National Character - ELH 67:1 ELH 67.1 (2000) 143-178
"A Middle Class Cut into Two": Historiography
and Victorian National Character Lauren M. E. Goodlad * In a recently
published essay, Ruth Perry carves out a distinctive place for literary
criticism in the field of cultural history. Unlike the historian, who
reads texts without recognizing "the cultural work that literature
performs," the critic's purpose is to "de-familiarize" assumptions that
are otherwise taken for granted. In a general sense, the following
essay comments upon Perry's thesis by assessing current directions in
Victorian studies. While critics do indeed strive to de-familiarize a
familiar that many (but by no means all) historians continue to reify,
it is also the case that the project of critical de-familiarization in
either field is often burdened by methodological inconsistency -- in
particular, by failures satisfactorily to address incompatibilities
between Foucauldian and more generally materialist approaches to
cultural analysis. To be sure, recent critics of Victorian culture have
dramatically illuminated the study of identity formation. Feminist
scholars, in particular, have demonstrated the profundity with which
constructions of gender and sexuality are implicated within histories
of the political, resulting in a far-reaching transformation of what
the political and its history are understood...