We are unable to display your institutional affiliation without JavaScript turned on.
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR

Find using OpenURL

Rent from DeepDyve Rent from DeepDyve

Empty Categories in Tuvaluan: NP-trace, PRO, pro, or variable?

From: Oceanic Linguistics
Volume 40, Number 2, December 2001
pp. 342-365 | 10.1353/ol.2001.0023

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Review Article Empty Categories in Tuvaluan: NP-trace, PRO, pro, or variable? Yuko Otsuka university of hawai‘i Niko Besnier. 2000. Tuvaluan. London and New York: Routledge. xxvi + 662 pp. $200, cloth. ISBN 0-415-02456-0. 1. INTRODUCTION.1 Besnier’s (2000) Tuvaluan is the third book on a Polynesian language in the Routledge “Descriptive Grammars” series, following Maori (Bauer 1993) and Rapanui (Du Feu 1996). The series editor, Bernard Comrie, states that the aim of this series is to provide comparable descriptions of various languages that can serve as a common ground for theoretical and descriptive linguists and make a truly fruitful interaction between them possible. To achieve this goal, the series adopts the Questionnaire (originally published as Lingua 47) as a standard format. Hence, the organization of this book is based on this format. As a whole, this book is not for general readers who are interested in Tuvaluan. Those who are interested in pedagogical grammar are referred to Besnier (1981). In fact, the reader may need some basic knowledge of Polynesian languages in general to fully appreciate the information this book provides. The author covers a wide range of phenomena and presents a thorough and detailed description for each topic, including discourse-related information. Thus, those who know what to look for, particularly those who are familiar with Polynesian languages, will ²nd this book quite useful. Unfortunately, the book’s organization does not make it easy to ²nd where to look for the kind of data one wants. One topic is often discussed in several different sections. Furthermore, the index is organized according to Tuvaluan lexical items, and not grammatical categories. This makes it hard to get an all-inclusive picture of a certain phenomenon, although the author provides detailed cross-reference. In a nutshell, this book is not particularly user-friendly, although its contents, namely the data, are stimulating. Given the objective of the Descriptive Grammars series, it would be fair to give a theoretical linguist’s review of this work. Besnier’s data, which are classi²ed and 1. I would like to thank William O’Grady and Stanley Starosta for their helpful comments and Oceanic Linguistics, Volume 40, no. 2 (December 2001) © by University of Hawai‘i Press. All rights reserved. suggestions on the earlier versions of this article. review article: tuvaluan 343 discussed in a descriptive framework, present a number of interesting problems to a theorist who looks at them from an analytical point of view. They de²nitely stimulate the interest of a theory-oriented reader, offering a number of topics for future research. In this article, I focus on one of such issues, namely the treatment of empty categories. Six phenomena that involve a syntactic gap are discussed in the book: zero-pronominalization, relativization, ko-clefting, raising, equi-deletion, and topicalization. Being a descriptive work, the book does not use the term “empty category,” nor does it pay particular attention to the nature of the gap in various constructions. However, as we will see shortly, classi²cation of empty categories plays a signi²cant role in analyzing the relevant data. In the following discussion, I “translate” the terms used in the book into the terms of Transformational Grammar. However, it should be emphasized that the gist of each problem remains the same no matter which theory is used to analyze the data. Thus, I believe that the reader should ²nd no dif²culty in projecting each problem into his/her own theoretical framework. 2. ORGANIZATION OF THE BOOK. The book consists of ²ve chapters, an introduction, references, and an index. The introduction covers the geographical and social aspects of Tuvalu as well as a general description of the language. Tuvaluan belongs to the Samoic-Outlier subgroup of the Polynesian family and is spoken by approximately 9,000 speakers in Tuvalu, formerly known as the Ellice Islands. The basic word order is VSO, although various other orders are also permitted. It is a prepositional language. Zero-pronominalization is possible and preferred for both subjects and objects. Case-marking is ergative. Verbal agreement is limited to some intransitive verbs. Wh-words remain in situ although many of them appear in clefted positions...



Access your Project MUSE content using one of the login options below

Shibboleth

Shibboleth authentication is only available to registered institutions.

Project MUSE