We are unable to display your institutional affiliation without JavaScript turned on.
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR

Find using OpenURL

Buy This Issue

Michael Ondaatje by Lee Spinks (review)

From: Studies in the Novel
Volume 45, Number 1, Spring 2013
pp. 140-142 | 10.1353/sdn.2013.0008

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Lee Spinks’s eponymous critical work on Michael Ondaatje spans most of his oeuvre and works well within the mandate of the Contemporary World Writers series, which is to publish books on “culturally diverse contemporary writers” that offer perspectives on their work that are not defined only by the postcolonial or the postmodern (series editor’s foreword). Spinks’s attempt to “account for the power and originality of Ondaatje’s writing” (17) through an elucidation of the possibility of a third viewpoint not solely defined by the binary oppositions of East and West, and somewhat eliding the postcolonial and postmodern, is commendable. Spinks uses Bhabha’s trope of hybridity and Peter Hallward’s distinction between “singular and specific modes of individuation” (17) to foreground his own interpretation and to create a nuanced reading that avoids unitary frameworks. The book is an excellent reference for incisive theoretical readings of Ondaatje’s work that move away from a solely postcolonial postmodern reading; however, the lack of a theoretical foregrounding for this differentiated reading prevents its arguments from being comprehensively articulated.

As befits a book that purports to cover all of Ondaatje’s work, the chapters are arranged chronologically, bookended by chapters titled “Contexts and Intertexts” and “Critical Overview and Conclusion.” Both chapters are useful, especially for beginners to Ondaatje criticism. The opening chapter provides an overview of Ondaatje’s life and the definitive influence that his Sri Lankan-Dutch-Canadian background has had on his work. It is somewhat puzzling that Spinks limits theoretical foregrounding to a small portion of the opening chapter. While the final chapter somewhat makes up for the lack of a theoretical introduction, it might have better served its purpose at the beginning of the book. The final chapter covers several of the influential works of Ondaatje criticism, but leaves out works such as Annick Hillger’s Not Needing All the Words: Michael Ondaatje’s Literature of Silence. While it is difficult to cover all of the extant criticism, given the scope of Spinks’s effort, the brevity of the bibliography makes this book less useful for beginners to Ondaatje criticism, a stated goal of the series.

Chapters 2 and 3 of the book deal with Ondaatje’s early poems, The Dainty Monsters, the man with seven toes, and his long poem The Collected Works of Billy the Kid. Pointing to the thematic continuity between Ondaatje’s poetry and his later prose, Spinks comments that the redemptive power of art is a constant theme in many of the poems. Spinks’s longer commentary on the man with seven toes effectively gathers Ondaatje’s variegated themes to display how “different modes of perception create different imaginative worlds” (41). Stripped of historical context, Ondaatje imbues the story with the power of myth as a contrast to “acute historical self-consciousness” (38). Spinks draws from Linda Hutcheon’s work on historiography to inform his reading of Billy the Kid, where he comments extensively on how the poem calls into question the versions of history and myth that have overlapped to create the persona we “know” as Billy the Kid. He also notes the topoi in this work as precursors to those more fully developed in Ondaatje’s first novel, Coming Through Slaughter.

Spinks observes that Coming Through Slaughter first and most fully develops two of Ondaatje’s continuing concerns: the Nietzschean “creative tension” between “becoming and being,” and “the conflict between molecular and molar life” (84, 79). In his portrayal of art as enabling the expression of singularity that can combat collective historical consciousness, Spinks notes, Ondaatje anticipates his later novels such as The English Patient. While Spinks’s analysis itself is comprehensive and compelling, the limited engagement with other Ondaatje critics and the relegation of oppositional viewpoints to the bibliographic notes section weakens the chapter.

The next chapter, an incisive engagement with the cross-genre work Running in the Family, engages most extensively with postcolonial criticism. Spinks notes that the work is imbued with Ondaatje’s concern with the “confrontation” between the reality of individual, polyphonic experience and a totalizing historical consciousness in the colonial context (128). He points out that marriage, in the work, becomes a metaphor for the...



You must be logged in through an institution that subscribes to this journal or book to access the full text.

Shibboleth

Shibboleth authentication is only available to registered institutions.

Project MUSE

For subscribing associations only.