We are unable to display your institutional affiliation without JavaScript turned on.
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR

Find using OpenURL

Rent from DeepDyve Rent from DeepDyve

A Dis-Identity Card: Geoffrey Hartman on the Paul de Man Affair, Twenty-Five Years Later

From: Jewish Quarterly Review
Volume 103, Number 2, Spring 2013
pp. 149-155 | 10.1353/jqr.2013.0010

Abstract

Abstract:

This essay will concentrate on one aspect of Hartman’s famous essay “History and Judgment: The Case of Paul de Man,” focusing on his notion of intellectual responsibility and judgment. I would like to distinguish between Derrida’s melancholic intervention in this affair and Hartman’s mournful one, a distinction that brings about two different notions of responsibility. Hartman introduces a complex idea of judgment which resembles that of Hannah Arendt, though she is not referred to explicitly in that context. To end, a distinction will be made between Hartman’s literary-theoretical task and his moral task, thereby differentiating him from the post-war figure of the philosopher-as-a-reader-of-literature.



You must be logged in through an institution that subscribes to this journal or book to access the full text.

Shibboleth

Shibboleth authentication is only available to registered institutions.

Project MUSE

For subscribing associations only.