From:
Hypatia
Volume 17, Number 3, Summer 2002
pp. 118-142 | 10.1353/hyp.2002.0066
This essay examines the possible systematic bias against the disabled in the structure and practice of genetic counseling. Finding that the profession's "nondirective" imperative remains problematic, the authors recommend that methodology developed by feminist standpoint epistemology be used to incorporate the perspective of disabled individuals in genetic counselors' education and practice, thereby reforming society's view of the disabled and preventing possible negative effects of genetic counseling on the self-concept and material circumstance of disabled individuals.
Access your Project MUSE content using one of the login options below


