We are unable to display your institutional affiliation without JavaScript turned on.
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR

Find using OpenURL

From Our Eyes: Mekong Migrant Reflections, 2000–2012 (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

The academic literature on migration provides a background that helps the reader to understand why and by whom From Our Eyes was written and why it should be read. The literature indicates that within the Greater Mekong Region, some 650,000 people hold work permits that allow them to cross borders annually in search of “better lives”. The region is composed of four countries of origin from which workers emigrate and a primary country of destination to which they move. Countries of origin include Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam while Thailand is the key country of destination.

Their search compels them to move either out of economic necessity and/or opportunity, family tradition, or a sense of adventure. They do so either legally or illegally and on either temporary or permanent bases. Regardless of motive and intent, legal migrant workers face an array of problems including the absence of full protection under labour laws coupled with the presence of situations in which they face unfair labour practices against which they have limited recourse. It is estimated that 40 per cent of regional worker migration involves women and this causes another array of problems including limited family access to healthcare and education opportunities for the children of migrants. The lack of familiarity with local customs and language limitations pose serious challenges particularly when they are accompanied by either discrimination or a lack of common civility on the part of some local residents.

Despite these negative factors, workers decide to cross borders along the greater Mekong river basin because they calculate that personal benefits exceed costs. However, undocumented workers face worse situations; their lack of legal status strips away any semblance of protection under the provisions of both destination country labour laws and intra-regional agreements among origin and destination countries. Some face human traffickers whose existence is the most egregious aspect of migration. Trafficking is conducted via physical abduction, deception, or duplicity. All too often, it leads to the exploitation of women who are forced into sexual service industries without any semblance of protection.

It is against this background that the volume, a compilation of migrants’ ideas, complaints, and recommendations was created and published. Fifteen migrants into Thailand from Myanmar and Cambodia were interviewed about their experiences as workers in industries ranging from agriculture, construction, mining, fisheries, hotel and domestic services to sexual services. Their interviews should be read “in their own words” as they appear unedited in the volume in order to preserve authenticities. For the purposes of summary and clarity, a version of their comments appears early in the book and begins with the comment that “We, migrants, have made very significant contributions to the social and economic development of the Greater Mekong … over the past ten years, however our positive impact is often overlooked, and our stories are not often heard… [But] when we are interviewed, our voices are generally considered testimony, and our experiences are summarized” (p. 1).

During 2010 and 2011, the interview with each migrant worker centred on her or his “personal background; high and low points in the past decade; education and vocational training, health insurance and medical check-ups; pre-departure processes; access to government support; personal identification documentation and travel documents; rights in the workplace; safety and work and training; … access to social justice; trafficking and smuggling arrest, detention and deportation” (p. 3).

Their experiences were summarized by the Mekong Migrant Network at an October 2010 meeting held in Bangkok where key issues were raised: (a) permitting migrants to register in Thailand (the key country of destination) independently from employers; (b) obtaining identity, work permit, and migrant worker cards; (c) enforcing anti-trafficking laws and policies; (d) protecting labour rights; (e) gaining improved access to healthcare including health insurance, and better access to education for migrant children; (f) obtaining telephones and using the Internet; and finally (g) reducing acts of social stigma and discrimination aimed at migrants by local residents.

Migrant needs and wants are reasonable: for example, they need to be able to move more freely and pay less for passports and work permits; they want to be responsible members of society who are treated with respect and whose children are...



You must be logged in through an institution that subscribes to this journal or book to access the full text.

Shibboleth

Shibboleth authentication is only available to registered institutions.

Project MUSE

For subscribing associations only.