In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • A Tale of Two Cities: Santo Domingo and New York After 1950
  • Themis Chronopoulos
A Tale of Two Cities: Santo Domingo and New York After 1950. By Jesse Hoffnung-Garskof. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008. Pp. xxxi, 319. Appendix. Illustrations. Notes. Bibliography. Index.

Since the 1990s, there have been numerous efforts to internationalize the fields of American Studies and United States history in ways that go beyond traditional diplomatic history and contemporary international relations. While many of these efforts are still underway, one of the fields where transnational American Studies has flourished is migration history, and Jesse Hoffnung-Garskof's book A Tale of Two Cities should be recognized as an important contribution.

Using archival and oral history methods, Hoffnung-Garskof explores the experiences of Dominicans in both Santo Domingo de Guzmán and New York City and in the process advances new historiographical arguments about the role of ordinary migrants in both the Dominican Republic and the United States. Hoffnung-Garskof pays close attention to the ideological and political developments of the Dominican Republic and their influence on people moving to both Santo Domingo and New York City; thus, his account does not fit into a narrative of what happens to immigrants only after they reach their destination in the United States. Indeed, he views the immigration of Dominicans to New York City as part of a larger process of urbanization that includes the movement from the Dominican countryside to Santo Domingo and the circular migration between Santo Domingo and New York. Although most of the research focuses on two neighborhoods, the Dominican neighborhoods of Cristo Rey in Santo Domingo and Washington Heights in New York City, the conclusions advanced can be applied to the two cities at large.

At the beginning of the twenty-first century, Dominicans constituted the largest foreign-born immigrant group in New York City, with almost all of those immigrants arriving after the mid-1960s. Historians have credited the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 as the main reason for increased immigration from Latin America. [End Page 621] However, Hoffnung-Garskof argues that this act was not necessarily advantageous: it actually placed numerical limitations on Latin Americans as a way to reduce immigration from south of the U.S. border. This means that other reasons must be sought to explain the increased numbers of Latin American immigrants. In the case of the Dominican Republic, the political aftershocks of the U.S. military invasion of 1965 and the demands of Dominicans for greater access to the United States forced the U.S. government to liberalize its visa policy and numerical restrictions. This explains the fact that by the 1980s, this small Caribbean nation was the largest source of emigration to New York City.

To advance his cultural explanations, Hoffnung-Garskof uses two racialized concepts progreso (progress) and cultura (culture). Developed by Dominican intellectuals who were influenced from Europe and maintained by the elites, these concepts were nonetheless appropriated by ordinary Dominicans who in the process redefined Dominican identity. The progreso concept implies that things improve over time and that individuals better their conditions through urbanization and social mobility; cultura defines the boundaries of cultural belonging and exclusion. Hoffnung-Garskof argues that these concepts both inform the thinking and actions of migrants and undergo a process of adaptation during and after migration, as conditions in Santo Domingo and New York City seldom satisfy the original assumptions. For example, low-income residents of Santo Domingo used the official language of progreso in their fight against spatial displacement and their demands for government services. Moreover, given the deteriorating neighborhood and material conditions that many Dominicans have encountered in both Santo Domingo and New York City, the meaning of progreso has been modified—it now implies an idealized version of the way that things should work. Ordinary Dominicans have also challenged the idea of cultura, which the elites have used in order to celebrate the popular customs they like as "Dominican" and dismiss cultural practices that they dislike as foreign (usually, Haitian or U.S.-inspired). For example, neighborhood leaders in Santo Domingo used cultura to regulate behavior and define the parameters of decency, while Dominicans in...

pdf

Share