In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Conversion and Narrative: Reading and Religious Authority in Medieval Polemic by Ryan Szpiech
  • Teofilo F. Ruiz
Szpiech, Ryan. Conversion and Narrative: Reading and Religious Authority in Medieval Polemic. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2013. 308 pp.

Szpiech’s richly-textured, erudite, and ambitious book, Conversion and Narrative, challenges readers with a series of complex, intriguing, and bold arguments. And his interpretative approach is built around engaging case studies and vignettes. They propel and illuminate Szpiech’s own narrative strategies and interpretative thrust in a wonderful fashion. Although there is a visible chronological continuity—as his focus moves from the earliest and most influential conversions in Christendom to the central and late Middle Ages—the book’s themes are presented in diachronic fashion, as we see his different arguments develop through the book’s chapters. Written from a multidisciplinary perspective—the book is as much about cultural history or religion as is about literature and critical theory—there are several main topics that resonate forcefully throughout Conversion and Narrative.

First, Szpiech wishes, in his own word, to study “the thing made,” that is, those personal narratives of conversion that are at the center of his inquiry. Second, beyond his close reading or “thick description” of these accounts, his emphasis is on the links between autobiographical accounts of conversion from one faith to another (mostly from Judaism or Islam to Christianity, though the reverse is also examined in depth and with care) and polemical writings against one former coreligionist. Here we follow the journey of some of these converts, most notably Abner of Burgos, a learned Jew of the eponymous city, who as Alfonso de Valladolid (his newly acquired Christian name) described his (late-thirteenth-early-fourteenth-century) conversion in dramatic fashion. Abner/Alfonso’s narrative of transformation is imbedded into a sophisticated polemical work against Judaism. Uniquely, as Szpiech points out in a later and quite remarkable chapter on this convert, Abner/ Alfonso’s main work, The Teacher of Righteousness, was composed in Hebrew and sought to buttress its authority by appealing almost exclusively to Hebrew sources to prove the truth of Christianity. Abner is, however, only one of the many conversos, albeit among the most prominent and documented figures, that grace the pages of this excellent book.

A third significant topic in Szpiech’s work is the shift that occurs in the relationship between authority, authenticity, reason, and language in the construction of narratives of conversion and polemical works. It is a complicated argument. It traces the development of polemical literature and the manner in which converso authors and polemicists, from the eleventh century onwards, sought new sources of legitimation for their works. In explaining these cultural shifts, Szpiech offers an impressive tour de force, displaying remarkable erudition, a mastery of vast primary and secondary sources, and the ability to research and interpret different religious and linguistic traditions.

After an introduction that sets the methodological parameters of his inquiry, chapter 1 examines the literary and religious archetypes for conversion narratives: those found in the writings of Paul of Tarsus, the Acts of the Apostles, [End Page 465] and St Augustine’s Confessions. Critical readings of later conversion stories, as for example that of the late-fourteenth-century learned rabbi Selomah ha Levi (Pablo de Santa Maria as a Christian), provide the reader with a sense of how conversion stories and polemical writings move from Patristic models to more complex philosophical arguments and to the deployment of non-Christian sources to buttress polemical stances. Chapter 2 develops these points further by examining several western European case studies of conversion from Judaism to Christianity, polemical writings related to these conversions, and, as was the case in the work of Petrus Alfonsus, the changes in the meaning of authority as the “Augustinian paradigm came up against new criteria of authenticity invoked on the basis of non-Christian sources” (77).

Chapter 3 turns to conversions from Christianity to Judaism. Though we get to see in detail only four case studies—mostly from the eastern Mediterranean—the chapter displays Szpiech’s familiarity with the relevant Jewish scholarly literature. A brilliant chapter 4 opens with the debate between a recent convert, Paul Christian, and...

pdf

Share