We are unable to display your institutional affiliation without JavaScript turned on.
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE


Download PDF

The Urban Social History of the Middle East, 1750-1950 (review)

From: Journal of Social History
Volume 44, Number 1, Fall 2010
pp. 267-268 | 10.1353/jsh.2010.0031

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Together with an introduction by the editor and Edmund Burke III, the book's seven articles effectively treat many of the major issues in Mid East urban history. These include cities' economic substructures, their demography, political relations with the broader state entity and the spatial place of minorities. Divided approximately equally between the Ottoman and post-Ottoman eras, the articles nearly exclusively emphasize the Arab regions at the expense of the Anatolian and Balkan portions of the Ottoman Empire and its successor states. This emphasis is hardly a surprise given the interests of the editor and the authors. But the volume would have been the richer with a contribution or two from the northern portions of the region.

I found the introduction to be quite useful for its overview of the sources and problematics in Mid East urban history. At the same time, I would quibble with its stress on French scholarship. While this is enlightening, it does overlook important other historiographies such as the Turkish and the German.

The article by Sarah Shields offers a very helpful overview of Ottoman urban-rural relations and the deep dependency of each upon the other. It certainly should be recommended reading for students entering the field. Gudrun Kramer's article should lay to their final resting places two favorite incorrect stereotypes, the one concerning the alleged but not real division of labor. The other regards the false image of cities' communal segregation by quarter. Kramer's findings for the Ottoman era fit remarkably well with that of other authors who emphasize the 20th as well as the 19th century.

Among the other contributions, Abdul-Karim Rafeq offers a fine survey of economic organizations in the cities of Ottoman Syria. This piece offers a rich array of primary data as well as comparisons with other areas of the empire. When read in conjunction with the Shields article and those by Dina Rizk Khoury on Ottoman city and state relations and by Leila Fawaz and Robert Ilbert on the colonial era, a particularly well-rounded perspective on the urban environment emerges. Like Rafeq, Bernard Hourcade presents an empirically-rich offering, this time surveying demographic changes and the changing forms of urbanization since c. 1800. Sami Zubaida's analysis of social movements treats the Ottoman and post-Ottoman eras and reminds us of how many evolutionary paths have been choked off thorough a combination of domestic and international repression.

Overall, this book is highly recommended for both introductory and advanced readers on the subject. It offers a series of fine syntheses of genuine value and sets a new benchmark for future studies.

Copyright © 2010 Peter N. Stearns
Project MUSE® - View Citation
Donald Quataert. "The Urban Social History of the Middle East, 1750-1950 (review)." Journal of Social History 44.1 (2010): 267-268. Project MUSE. Web. 25 Jan. 2013. <http://muse.jhu.edu/>.
Quataert, D.(2010). The Urban Social History of the Middle East, 1750-1950 (review). Journal of Social History 44(1), 267-268. Oxford University Press. Retrieved January 25, 2013, from Project MUSE database.
Donald Quataert. "The Urban Social History of the Middle East, 1750-1950 (review)." Journal of Social History 44, no. 1 (2010): 267-268. http://muse.jhu.edu/ (accessed January 25, 2013).
T1 - The Urban Social History of the Middle East, 1750-1950 (review)
A1 - Donald Quataert
JF - Journal of Social History
VL - 44
IS - 1
SP - 267
EP - 268
PY - 2010
PB - Oxford University Press
SN - 1527-1897
UR - http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_social_history/v044/44.1.quataert.html
N1 - Volume 44, Number 1, Fall 2010
ER -