+ MUSE Alert

In this Issue

Table of Contents

  1. How language use shapes meaning: A Case Study of Singapore Southern Min Loanword Balu
  2. Teo Ming Chew
  3. pp. 548-585
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0018
  5. restricted access
  1. How does the prosody influence verb-included compound
  2. Pei Yulai, Qiu Jinping
  3. pp. 586-604
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0020
  5. restricted access
  1. Types of falling tones
  2. Zhu Xiaonong
  3. pp. 605-637
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0022
  5. restricted access
  1. Devoicing of Historically Voiced Obstruents in Xiangxiang Chinese––an Acoustic-Phonetic Perspective
  2. Zeng Ting
  3. pp. 638-667
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0024
  5. restricted access
  1. A Chinese phonological enigma
  2. Geoffrey Sampson
  3. pp. 679-691
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0014
  5. restricted access
  1. A Paradox: Merger or Compounding — Which comes First? Comments on Geoffrey Sampson’s Article
  2. Matthew Y Chen
  3. pp. 692-696
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0017
  5. restricted access
  1. The Enigma Variations: Response to Sampson
  2. Daniel Silverman
  3. pp. 697-702
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0019
  5. restricted access
  1. Comment on Geoffrey Sampson, “A Chinese Phonological Enigma”
  2. Mieko Ogura
  3. pp. 702-709
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0021
  5. restricted access
  1. A Highly Improbable Data Point
  2. Abby Kaplan
  3. pp. 710-713
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0023
  5. restricted access
  1. Multisyllabication and Phonological Simplification Throughout Chinese History
  2. Wang Feng
  3. pp. 714-718
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0025
  5. restricted access
  1. G. Sampson, “A Chinese Phonological Enigma”: Four Comments
  2. Wolfgang Behr
  3. pp. 719-732
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0013
  5. restricted access
  1. Five Comments on “A Chinese Phonological Enigma” by Professor Geoffrey Sampson
  2. Feng Shengli
  3. pp. 733-739
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0016
  5. restricted access
  1. Reply to the Comments
  2. Geoffrey Sampson
  3. pp. 740-753
  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0027
  5. restricted access