In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Hispanic American Historical Review 80.2 (2000) 390-392



[Access article in PDF]

Book Review

Diversidad partidaria y dictaduras:
Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay

El maremoto militar y el archipiélago partidario:
testimonios para la historia reciente de los partidos políticos uruguayos

National Period

Diversidad partidaria y dictaduras: Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay. Edited by Silvia Dutrénit Bielous. Mexico City: Institute de Investigaciones Dr. José María Luis Mora, 1996. Tables. Notes. 315 pp. Paper.

El maremoto militar y el archipiélago partidario: testimonios para la historia reciente de los partidos políticos uruguayos. By Silvia Dutrénit Bielous. Prologue by Gerardo Caetano. Montevideo: Productora Editorial; Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. José Luis María Mora, 1994. Notes. 326 pp. Paper.

The plague of repression that swept through Latin America in the 1960s and the 1970s left virtually no political system untouched. Even countries such as Chile and Uruguay that had a history of democratic regimes succumbed to military dictatorship. In the two volumes reviewed here, Silvia Dutrénit Bielous, an Uruguayan historian working in Mexico, offers two very different approaches to examine the relationship between the military and political parties under the military regimes in three countries of the Southern cone, as well as the role of those political parties during the subsequent transition to democracy. The volume entitled Diversidad partidaria y dictaduras offers in-depth analyses of the Argentine, Brazilian, and Uruguayan cases. The second volume with the cryptic title El maremoto militar y el archipiélago partidario focuses exclusively on Uruguay and includes the author's interviews with various Uruguayan political leaders about the dictatorship from 1973 to 1984.

Interviews with politicians are always tricky, but the author tries to keep the self-serving [End Page 390] statements of career politicians under control by asking some timely questions. In addition, her choice of political leaders is balanced and includes most of the key players in the transition process. There are no new revelations; however, several of the interviews give us insight into the character and personalities of Uruguayan politicians, such as Senator Jorge Batlle, Hugo Corres, Luis Lacalle, and Julio María Sanguinetti. Batlle, who could be Uruguay's next President, displays an encyclopedic grasp of the individuals and motives of the people who were involved in the political process during Uruguay's long nightmare; Hugo Cores continues to believe in his passionate and well-constructed leftist interpretation of events; Luis Lacalle, former President, displays his conservative roots; and Julio María Sanguinetti, shows the grasp of language that has twice made him Uruguay's President.

All those interviewed continue to insist that in the protracted discussions of the Club Naval that ultimately led to the military's exit, the issue of human rights violations was never placed on the table. In addition, they confirm that triumvirates were formed by the leaders of Uruguay's main political parties--Blancos, Colorados and the leftist coalition Frente Amplio--to make decisions and attempt to guide party policy during an exceptionally difficult period. In sum, this volume would only be of interest to those who study Uruguayan history and politics and, even then, only marginally.

The first volume, on the other hand, with its thoughtful analysis of the Argentine, Brazilian, and Uruguayan cases is worthy of any scholar's attention. The restoration of democracy in these three countries has heightened our interest in political parties for two reasons: first, to understand their role during the transition from an authoritarian regime until the consolidation of democracy; second, to recognize the importance of political parties as institutions because even the military tried to either destroy or restructure them. The military's desperate search for legitimacy--an effort that failed miserably in Argentina and Uruguay, but achieved moderate success in Brazil--prompted the dictatorships to think about, legislate, and ultimately recognize the role of political parties in their respective polities.

Cesar Tcach handles the Argentine case in his chapter "Partidos políticos y dictadura militar en Argentina...

pdf

Share