In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • For Prophet and Tsar: Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia
  • Wolfgang G. Schwanitz (bio)
Robert D. Crews, For Prophet and Tsar: Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006), 463 pp.

Although the Russian and Islamic empires were heirs to a common Byzantine heritage, they experienced about a half millennium of bellicose relations while [End Page 512] the Russians expanded steadily into Central Asian lands. Splendidly, “this book shows how Russia became a Muslim power and how the government made Islam a pillar of imperial society, transforming Muslims into active participants in the daily operation of the autocracy and the local construction and maintenance of the empire.” Thereafter, Bolshevists cast an atheistical shadow over all that mattered to the Muslim faithful. Those infidels managed even to create a Eurasian brand of Islam and a Homo sovieticus islamicus. Bolshevists aspired to world revolution and called Muslims to jihad against the rulers of rival empires, but Hitler turned Muslim prisoners of war around to jihad against their Soviet masters. After the Germans’ defeat, some of those anti-Soviet Muslims from Central Asia settled down in Munich. With the Cold War in full swing, Western clandestine services recruited among them. Some were dispatched undercover as pilgrims to Mecca after Stalin’s death, so that they could discuss Khrushchev and de-Stalinization with pilgrims from Soviet Central Asia—Tatars, Bashkirs, Kazakhs, Turkmenians, Tadjiks, Uzbeks, and citizens of the other–stans. The aim of Western intelligence was to explore Islamic potential for opposition to the Soviet colonization of their lands. But the leader of Soviet pilgrims, Imam Mirza G. Salikhov, readily found passages in the Qur’an that could be interpreted in the Kremlin’s favor. The imam drew his salary from Moscow, though in the past he had spent two years in the Gulag. He knew of Khrushchev’s reforms, though not of his secret anti-Stalin speech. Nevertheless, according to Western intelligence, Salikhov smoothly combined Islamic and communist ways of life; and most of the Muslims in his group (who rejected proffered gifts) also spoke favorably of their life in the U.S.S.R. Only one among them disclosed that, in order to encourage his prompt return, the Soviets had compelled him to leave his family at home. In Mecca, these Soviet Muslims acted as consensual imperial subjects even when, in Moscow, the anti-Stalin disclosures were being made. The Soviet Muslims in Mecca spoke of “our government” and rejected “counterrevolutionary lies.” As we know, there are now Muslims in the Russian Federation who would like to return to those “sunny Soviet days” before the onset of “today’s chaos.” A question worth asking is why the Soviets were so much more skillful in their dealings with Muslims than either their postcommunist successors or their Western rivals have been. [End Page 513]

Wolfgang G. Schwanitz

Wolfgang G. Schwanitz, visiting professor of international affairs at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, is the author of Gold, Bankers, and Diplomats: A History of the German Orient Bank, 1906–46; Egypt’s Infitah Open-Door Policy; and Egypt and Germany in the 19th and 20th Centuries; as well as coauthor of Germans in the Mideast, 1946–65 (in two volumes).

...

pdf

Share