In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Religious Men and Masculine Identity in the Middle Ages ed. by P. H. Cullum, Katherine J. Lewis
  • Donald S. Prudlo
Religious Men and Masculine Identity in the Middle Ages. Edited by P. H. Cullum and Katherine J. Lewis. [Gender in the Middle Ages, Vol. 9.] (Rochester, NY: The Boydell Press, an imprint of Boydell and Brewer. 2013. Pp. x, 214. $99.00. ISBN 978-1-84383-863-0.)

This work is the result of the conference on “Religious Men in the Middle Ages,” which took place at the University of Huddersfield in July 2012. The editors, P. H. Cullum and Katherine J. Lewis, are to be commended for so quickly producing a fine set of essays and bringing them to publication. The various chapters of the work seek to advance our understanding of the Herrenfrage, or the idea that the concept of masculinity was undergoing rapid changes during and after the period of the Gregorian reforms, especially in relation to more stringent insistence on clerical celibacy. This book is particularly good in demonstrating the vitality of male clerical and monastic forms of life into the Middle Ages and helps to redress what perhaps had been an overemphasis of medieval female religiosity over the last twenty-five years. [End Page 328]

Cullum and Lewis provide an exceptionally helpful introduction wherein they situate the current state of scholarship regarding male religiosity as it relates to gender. This is a very useful tool, which will enable students and scholars to understand the emphases and directions of contemporary study. Indeed, nearly all the contributors include useful historiographical discussions at the beginnings of their papers—something of broad usefulness to the reader, especially when the research becomes very specialized.

Although this is fundamentally a book about Christian Europe and the various experiences of maleness within the context of clerical and religious life, the first chapter by Michael Satlow discusses gender as it relates to Torah study among European rabbis. This provides a foil for the rest of the work, with its interesting description of how values relating to masculine aggression became transposed into academic study of the Torah and religious argumentation. Rachel Stone follows with an exposition of Hincmar of Rheims and his understanding of masculinity. She usefully explores both his ideal theory and the reality he confronted, closing with the interesting notion that clerical masculinity was defined in relation to other men, rather than in opposition to femininity. Jennifer Thibodeaux provides a fascinating glimpse into anticelibacy critics in the period following the Gregorians. She carefully details how much of the struggle was focused on control of the male body. Each group claimed that their position guaranteed true manliness in terms of bodily self-control. Defenders of clerical marriage also argued that celibacy encouraged effeminacy and sodomy and that, as celibacy was a gift of God, uniform enforcement unduly burdened those not so gifted. Kristen Fenton works subtly to undermine claims that the medieval clergy represented a “Third Gender” by being unable to participate in gender-defining activities like sex and war. She details how religious men and male saints were depicted using active and “manly” language.

The tone begins to shift as the book starts to take note of lay masculinities. Joanna Huntington traces the history of Hereward, a post-Norman knight and adventurer. She skillfully unpacks the clerical authorship and demonstrates how the clergy understood lay masculinity. Episcopal masculinity is measured against that of the laity in Matthew Mesley’s contribution on the First Crusade. He uses descriptions of Bishop Adhemar’s leadership to demonstrate the dialogic interpenetration of clerical and lay ideals of manhood. Marita von Weissenberg contributes an interesting comparison of two lay saints: one a combmaker from Siena, Peter Pettinaio, and one a nobleman from Provence, Elzéar of Sabran. She shows how lay religiosity resulted in no diminution of masculinity, but rather an elevation and purification of manliness onto the spiritual plane. Katherine Lewis discusses manliness in the context of the life of Henry VI, demonstrating how royal and male exemplarity played a role in the depiction of Henry’s own male qualities. Catherine Sanok gives an interesting contribution on St. John of Bridlington, particularly dwelling on...

pdf

Share