In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Church and Cosmos in Early Ottonian Germany: The View from Cologne
  • Mariken Teeuwen
Church and Cosmos in Early Ottonian Germany: The View from Cologne. By Henry Mayr-Harting. (New York: Oxford University Press. 2007. Pp. xxii, 308, 8 plates. $110.00. ISBN 978-0-199-21071-8.)

One would not expect to find glosses on Boethius’s Arithmetic or Martianus Capella’s Marriage of Mercury and Philology treated in a book called Church and Cosmos in Early Ottonian Germany. Yet this is exactly what Henry Mayr-Harting does: He uses marginal annotations and glosses on these (and other) texts, which are miles apart from church legislation or ruler administration, to provide insight into the culture of mid-tenth-century Cologne, the center of Ottonian ecclesiastical and political rule. Starting off with Bruno, brother of Emperor Otto I, archbishop of Cologne and duke of Lotharingia, Mayr-Harting takes us into the world of Ruotger, his biographer, and makes an attempt at reconstructing their thought-world using the glosses and marginalia of the manuscript collection of tenth-century Cologne. It is a refreshing approach, which produces many valuable things, such as the first edition of the earliest known corpus of glosses to Boethius’s Arithmetic, and a new and justified emphasis on the strong Platonic current in tenth-century scholarship (that is long before the so-called revival of Platonism in twelfth-century France). Departing from observations of minute details hidden in tiny script in the margins of manuscripts, Mayr-Harting thus reaches sweeping statements about Ottonian intellectual and political life.

The first chapter is an introduction in the world of Bruno of Cologne and Ruotger. Already in this concise survey of Ottonian politics, intellectual culture functions as a focus for the portrayal of the ideals of Ottonian rule and [End Page 329] church politics. Mayr-Harting shows how Bruno’s mission as archbishop drove him to act as an educator, both in religion and the liberal arts. Intellectual activity was usefully related to rule, and how this was done is illustrated in the subsquent chapters: on the method of his scholarship; on Ruotger, Bruno, and the Fathers; on the liberal arts at Cologne; and on the tenth-century interest in texts present at the time in Cologne, such as Prudentius’s Psychomachia, Boethius’s Arithmetic, and Martianus Capella’s Marriage of Mercury and Philology.

In his exploration of Boethius’s Arithmetic and Martianus’s Marriage of Mercury and Philology (a fifth-century compendium of the seven liberal arts with a very strong neo-Platonic tone) Mayr-Harting demonstrates that the interest in these texts was not guided primarily by a practical interest in calculation or other disciplines, but that it was driven by an ethical or philosophical curiosity, a true search for wisdom in the Platonic sense. The interest in Arithmetic is directed at abstract concepts, such as the nature of unity (which well relates to rulership ethics), and Aristotelian qualities such as divisible and indivisible. In glosses added to Martianus’s text the role of fables and analogies in the search for truth is emphasized: fables, the glossators say, cloth the naked truth, and since naked truth is something the human mind cannot perceive, clothing is a necessary element of this truth—an interesting point of view, which reflects the wider debate on pre-or non-Christian learning in the early Middle Ages and its place in the education of Christians.

The book shows us new ways to explore the world of medieval thought: the as-yet largely undiscovered wealth of gloss collections found in manuscripts. Mayr-Harting convinces his readers that an unexpected treasure is waiting to be found, and many scholars could follow in his footsteps, taking new texts, libraries, or medieval learned minds as their points of departure. However, Mayr-Harting’s inclination to see everything in the light of Bruno of Cologne sometimes can be too overpowering. The tone for the study of authors such as Boethius and Martianus was already set in the ninth century, as the ninth-century commentary tradition on Martianus’s De nuptiis shows. This tradition is dated to the first half of the ninth century and seems closely connected...

pdf

Share