In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Related Lives: Confessors and Their Female Penitents, 1450-1750
  • Patricia Ranft
Related Lives: Confessors and Their Female Penitents, 1450-1750. By Jodi Bilinkoff. (Ithaca and New York: Cornell University Press. 2005. Pp. xiii, 181. $45.00.)

The implicit question Jodi Bilinkoff addresses here is one that has been asked for decades now: How much power did women truly have in early modern Europe? When women's studies first began a half-century ago, the given was that they had none. It has taken two generations of scholarship to correct this initial erroneous assumption, but thanks to scholars such as Bilinkoff the task is nearly complete. The text is lean and well organized. It studies the relationship between women and their spiritual directors by examining forty-two vitae of women (twenty from Spain) written between 1450 and 1750. The first chapter provides the historical context, while the second places the hagiography in its literary context. Chapters three and four are the meat of the book where the texts are analyzed and five case studies presented. In the final chapter Bilinkoff examines women's reading habits and the influence the lives and Lives of other women had on them. In her conclusion she offers her interpretation of the effect these relationships had on early modern Catholicism.

Bilinkoff's book is the best kind, one that leaves you asking for more when you turn that last page. It is a book that leaves you with more questions than it answers—and that is what keeps historical investigation alive. For example, she comments in passing that these vitae also "provide a window into the lives and aspirations of that most neglected of social groups, Catholic priests" (p. 10). She is right; couldn't someone take these texts and re-examine them with clerical history in mind?

Of course, the answers Bilinkoff does provide are of utmost importance, and they are answers particularly close to my heart. In 1994 I wrote an article where I suggested that there was a correlation between women, their spiritual directors, and women's increasingly visible role in church life. I used broad-brush strokes and offered minimal documentation to support the thesis. But it rang true, and through the years others began supplying the missing documentation. I see Related Lives as the final word on the matter. It is the definitive study of how these "frequently reciprocal, if not equal in power" relationships between male confessors and female penitents provided "a key to understanding the persistence and perpetuation of Catholic culture throughout the early-modern period" (p. 11).

Now to the portion of the review where I criticize some obscure point; unfortunately, I fail this test because I really do not have any criticism. The best [End Page 166] I can do is to offer to debate a minor argument Bilinkoff makes in her conclusion. Bilinkoff blames the Jansenist-Jesuit conflict for the end of the confessor-female penitent relationship (Jesuits were popular hagiographers and confessors of women) and all the positive ramifications of those relationships. I do not deny that the controversy created havoc within Western society in general and for women in particular, but I think Bilinkoff stops short of identifying the real culprit: the Enlightenment. It is when the Enlightenment comes with its more secular, antireligious tenets that relationships grounded in religious tenets become less effective. From that point on, women needed to establish equal relationships in the secular realm to be effective, and confession was obviously not in the secular realm. Insofar as Jansenism contributed to the loss of prestige for Jesuits and thus confession, it was detrimental to women, but the Enlightenment was the hundred-pound gorilla. Response, Prof. Bilinkoff?

Patricia Ranft
Central Michigan University
...

pdf

Share