In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

The Catholic Historical Review 92.4 (2006) 698-699

Reviewed by
Harlan Beckley
Washington and Lee University
The Kingdom Is Always But Coming: A Life of Walter Rauschenbusch. By Christopher H. Evans. [Library of Religious Biography.] (Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 2004. Pp. xxx, 348. $25.00 paperback.)

Evans's biography of the most influential and sophisticated Protestant theological social ethicist and reformer early in the twentieth century serves two audiences.

It offers those who have studied Rauschenbusch in depth a rich account of his life and thought in relation to other Christian writers during this period and in relation to Christian scriptures and tradition. Evans exhaustive, and sometimes repetitive, reporting on his subject's personal life surpasses in comprehensive detail the only other balanced biography of Rauschenbusch, the one by Paul Minus. Evans has combed the many boxes of the Rauschenbusch archives at the Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School for correspondence revealing personal matters such as Rauschenbusch's relations to the institution of the family and his own family members and his embrace of an upper-middle class financial and social status. Evans ably uses these discoveries to show connections between his subject's life and his theology and ethics that have escaped other interpreters of Rauschenbusch. I, for one, would have written a richer understanding of Rauschenbusch on justice had Evans's book been available.

Second, Evans offers those interested in American Christian social ethics a readable and enjoyable introduction to its principal Protestant progenitor. Evans competently explicates Rauschenbusch's most prominent theological and ethical innovations as well as the evangelical and Anabaptist roots of these [End Page 698] contributions to social ethics. Although this biography does not render Paul Minus's book otiose, it provides at least as adequate an entree into the fertile thought of Rauschenbusch.

Relying solely on Evans to introduce Rauschenbusch, however, can mislead and diminish the penetrating creativity of his theology and his legacy for social ethics. Evans proposes to interpret Rauschenbusch as a window for a better understanding of Protestant thought in the United States at the turn of the twentieth century in a strictly chronological approach to his subject, mingling interpretations of Rauschenbusch's professional and personal activity during distinct periods in his life. The result portrays Rauschenbusch as embodying the most prominent typical expression of Protestant liberal theology and the Social Gospel within the cultural constraints of his era. Yet Evans unrestrainedly describes Rauschenbusch's traits and values from a twentieth-first century perspective. Evans labels his subject an idealist and moralist (in juxtaposition to Marxist materialism); a Victorian paternalist with regard to family, gender relations, and work; and as keeping upper middle-class distance from the laboring class whom he purported to champion. These partially accurate descriptions fit John A. Ryan, Rauschenbusch's most influential Catholic counterpart, as well as they do Rauschenbusch. They also veil characteristics of Rauschenbusch's thought that make it a distinctively valuable source for contemporary theology and ethics.

Most important, Evans fails to account fully for how Rauschenbusch connected the realization of religious and moral ideas in the Kingdom of God with their embodiment in movements and institutions within the church, politics, education, family, and the economy. These connections are most fully explained in Christianizing the Social Order, a book Evans interprets more as a sequel to Rauschenbusch's first book, Christianity and the Social Crisis, than as a distinctive contribution to the corpus of his thought. Rauschenbusch's recognition that religious and moral ideas must be instantiated in social institutions with a momentum of their own modified his idealism and his use of theological concepts such as sin, grace, and redemption. Full appreciation for this dimension of Rauschenbusch's thought enables more discerning descriptions and evaluations of his views regarding family, work, middle-class values, class relations, and even paternalism. Rauschenbusch was, of course, constrained by the cultural and moral values of his place and time, but Evans, despite meticulous research and appreciation for his subject, misses some of...

pdf

Share