+ MUSE Alert

In this Issue

Table of Contents

  1. Is Milgram’s Deceptive Research Ethically Acceptable?
  2. Diana Baumrind
  3. pp. 1-18
  4. restricted access
  1. Baumrind’s Reflections on Her Landmark Ethical Analysis of Milgram’s Obedience Experiments (1964): An Appraisal of Her Current Views
  2. Arthur G. Miller
  3. pp. 19-44
  4. restricted access
  1. The Difference between Blind Treatment and Blind Debriefing: A Response to Baumrind
  2. Augustine Brannigan
  3. pp. 45-51
  4. restricted access
  1. Milgram’s Obedience to Authority: Its Origins, Controversies, and Replications
  2. Harry Perlstadt
  3. pp. 53-77
  4. restricted access
  1. Deception and Illusion in Milgram’s Accounts of the Obedience Experiments
  2. Gina Perry
  3. pp. 79-92
  4. restricted access
  1. Milgram and the Prevalence of Anthropocentrism
  2. Frank Jankunis
  3. pp. 93-104
  4. restricted access
  1. The Milgram Obedience Experiments and the Problem of Studying Authority Figures in Political and Social Science Research
  2. Sara R. Jordan
  3. pp. 105-122
  4. restricted access
  1. The Milgram Trap
  2. Edward Erdos
  3. pp. 123-142
  4. restricted access
  1. From the Editor
  3. pp. vii-viii
  4. restricted access
  1. Contributors
  3. pp. 143-145
  4. restricted access