A review of Religion and Philosophy, by R. G. Collingwood
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

556 ] A review of Religion and Philosophy, by R. G. Collingwood London: Macmillan, 1917. Pp. xviii + 219.1 The International Journal of Ethics, 27 (July 1917) 543 Mr. Collingwood has conceived a task very similar to that of Mr. Temple (Mens Creatrix)–the necessary completion of philosophy in religion.2 He holds, however, that philosophy and religion are in reality the same thing; for even a materialistic philosophy, firmly held, may be a man’s religion. He proposes then “to treat the Christian creed not as dogma but as a critical solution of a philosophical problem” [xiii]. Mr. Collingwood is successful at least to this extent, that granted the historical facts of Christianity, a most efficient philosophy can be built upon them. It is true that history and philosophy, as Mr. Collingwood­ contends, are interdependent. But philosophy depends upon the whole course of history, not upon any particular signal and unique facts; and its freedom of interpretation is limited only by its obligation to exclude nothing .Religion,on the other hand, or at least the Christian religion, depends upon one important fact. Philosophy may show, if it can, the meaning of the statement that Jesus was the son of God. But Christianity–orthodox Christianity–must base itself upon a unique fact: that Jesus was born of a virgin: a proposition which is either true or false, its terms having a fixed meaning. It seems therefore insufficient to claim, what seems to be the extent of Mr. Collingwood’s historical demands, that Jesus was an historical person. Mr. Collingwood attacks the problem of evil by conceiving of God “not as imposing his will on the world from without, but as himself sharing in all the experiences of other minds” [125]. “God is the absolute good will” [142]. Mr. Collingwood admits that the universe is a totality only in posse. One is tempted to ask whether the omnipotence and absolute good will of God are also in posse.3 The philosophical interpretation of the Incarnation, of the Atonement, and of Miracle, are extremely well handled. T. S. Eliot [ 557 Review: Religion and Philosophy Notes 1. R.G.Collingwood(1889-1943),knownasaphilosopher,wrotehisfirstbook,herereviewed, in theology. TSE had attended his lectures at Oxford (Pembroke College) on Aristotle’s De anima and taken detailed notes for J. H. Woods (L1 67, 83). On the flyleaf of his copy of De anima (King’s), TSE wrote: “Used in 1914-15 with notes made during R. G. Collingwood’s explication de texte.” On 7 Feb 1929, TSE wrote to Edward Dahlberg, “the only man I know who is any good in Oxford is Collingwood” (L4 425). 2. TSE’s review of Mens Creatrix is printed on the same page in the IJE as this review of Religion and Philosophy. 3. in posse: in potentiality. ...