restricted access References
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

References Aberbach, Joel D. 2001.“Republican Oversight.”Presented at the 2001 Midwest Political Science Association Meeting in Chicago, IL. ———. 1990. Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. ———. 1979. “Changes in Congressional Oversight.” American Behavioral Scientist 22: 493–515. Ainsworth, Scott. 1997. “The Role of Legislation in the Determination of Interest Group Influence in Legislatures.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 22:517–34. ———. 1993. “Regulating Lobbyists and Interest Group Influence.” The Journal of Politics 55, 1: 41–56. Art, Robert J. 1989.“The Pentagon: The Case for Biennial Budgeting.” Political Science Quarterly 104, 2: 193–214. ———. 1985. “Congress and the Defense Budget: Enhancing Policy Oversight.” Political Science Quarterly 100, 2: 227–48. Balla, Steven J. 1998. “Administrative Procedures and Political Control of the Bureaucracy.”American Political Science Review 92, 3. (Sept., 1998): 663–73. Balla,Steven J.and Christopher J.Deering.2001.“Oversight over Time and across Committees:AnOperationalMeasureof PolicePatrolsandFireAlarms.”Presented at the 2001 Midwest Political Science Association Meeting in Chicago, IL. Banks, Jeffrey S. 1989. “Agency Budgets, Cost Information, and Auditing.” American Journal of Political Science, 33, 3: 670–99. Banks, Jeffrey S. and Barry R. Weingast. 1992. “The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information.” American Journal of Political Science 36, 2: 509–24. Bauer,RaymondA.,Ithiel de Sola Pool,and LewisAnthony Dexter.1972. American Business & Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade. 2nd ed. Chicago: Aldine–Atherton. Baumann, David. 1999. “Government on Autopilot.” The National Journal (March 13): 688–92. Baumgartner,Frank R.and Bryan D.Jones.1993.Agendas and Instability inAmerican Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Baumgartner, Frank R. and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 131 Hall_References_3rd.qxd 8/16/2004 4:55 PM Page 131 Beck,Nathaniel,JonathanN.Katz,andRichardTucker.1997.“TakingTimeSeriously: Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42, 4: 1260–88. Bendor, Jonathan and Terry M. Moe. 1986. “Agenda Control, Committee Capture,and the Dynamics of Institutional Politics.”American Political Science Review 80, 4: 1187–1207. Berry, Jeffrey M. 2000. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Binder, Sarah A. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock.” American Political Science Review 93, 3: 519–34. Birnbaum, Jeffrey. 1987. Showdown at Gucci Gulch. New York: Random House. Bond, Jon R. and Richard Fleisher. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Brady, David and Barbara Sinclair. 1984. “Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 46, 4: 1033–60. Browne,William P.andWon K.Paik.1993.“Beyond the Domain:Recasting Network Politics in the Postreform Congress.”American Journal of Political Science 37, 4: 1054–78. Burkhead, Jesse. 1956. Government Budgeting. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Caiden, Naomi. 1983.“Guidelines to Federal Budget Reform.”Public Budgeting & Finance 3: 4–22. Calderia, Gregory A. and John R. Wright. 1990. “Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?” The Journal of Politics 52, 3: 782–806. ———.1988.“Organized Interests andAgenda Setting in the U.S.Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82, 4: 1109–27. Cohen, Jeffrey E. 1995. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 87–107. Collender,Stanley E.1997.The Guide to the Federal Budget: FiscalYear 1997. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Committee on the Budget. 1997. The Congressional Budget Process: An Explanation. Washington, DC: United States Senate. Committee Print: 104–70. Congressional Budget Office. 1990–2000. Unauthorized Appropriations and Expiring Authorizations. Washington, DC: The Congress of the United States. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1998a.“Dispute over Competition Leads to Interim Six-Month Reauthorization of FAA.” 24–34–24–35. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1998b.“Transportation Law Benefits Those Who Held the Purse Strings.” 24–3–24–12. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1994a.“FAA Reauthorized for Three Years.” 168–69. References 132 Hall_References_3rd.qxd 8/16/2004 4:55 PM Page 132 Congressional Quarterly Almanac.1994b.“Lawmakers Renew and Revamp 1965 Education Act.” 383–96. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1993. “Transportation Programs Score Big Gains.” 663–70. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1991. “Air Bag Mandates Moved.” 15. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1988. “Consumer Product Safety.” 580–81. Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1977.“How Wright Fashioned His Victory.”6. Cook, Brain J. 1989. “Principal-Agent Models of Political Control of Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 83, 3: 965–78. Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government...


Subject Headings

  • Budget process -- United States.
  • Budget -- United States.
  • United States. Congress -- Committees.
  • Government spending -- United States -- Decision making.
  • United States -- Appropriations and expenditures -- Decision making.
  • Policy sciences.
  • You have access to this content
  • Free sample
  • Open Access
  • Restricted Access