Indiana University Press
Website: http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/
Indiana University Press was founded in 1950 and is recognized
internationally as a leading academic publisher of books and journals. The
Press specializes in the humanities and social sciences. Major subject
areas include African, African American, Asian, classical and ancient,
cultural, Jewish, Middle East, Russian and East European, and women's and
gender studies; anthropology, film, folklore, history, bioethics, music,
paleontology, philanthropy, philosophy, and religion.
Indiana University Press also features an extensive regional publishing
program.
Browse Results For:
Indiana University Press
The Battle of Dobro Pole 1918
Richard C. Hall
With the transfer of German units to the western front in the spring of
1918, the position of the Central Powers on the Macedonian front worsened. Materiel
became scarce and morale among the Bulgarian forces deteriorated. The Entente
Command perceived in Macedonia an excellent opportunity to apply additional pressure
to the Germans, who were already retreating on the western front. In September,
Entente forces undertook an offensive directed primarily at Bulgarian defenses at
Dobro Pole. Balkan Breakthrough tells the story of that battle and its consequences.
Dobro Pole was the catalyst for the collapse of the Central Powers and the Entente
victory in southeastern Europe -- a defeat that helped persuade the German military
leadership that the war was lost. While decisive in ending World War I in the
region, the battle did not resolve the underlying national issues there.
Interracial Sex in Nineteenth-Century American Literature
Cassandra Jackson
This provocative book examines the representation of characters of mixed
African and European descent in the works of African American and European American
writers of the 19th century. The importance of mulatto figures as agents of
ideological exchange in the American literary tradition has yet to receive sustained
critical attention. Going beyond Sterling Brown's melodramatic stereotype of the
mulatto as "tragic figure," Cassandra Jackson's close study of nine works
of fiction shows how the mulatto trope reveals the social, cultural, and political
ideas of the period. Jackson uncovers a vigorous discussion in 19th-century fiction
about the role of racial ideology in the creation of an American identity. She
analyzes the themes of race-mixing, the "mulatto," nation building, and
the social fluidity of race (and its imagined biological rigidity) in novels by
James Fenimore Cooper, Richard Hildreth, Lydia Maria Child, Frances E. W. Harper,
Thomas Detter, George Washington Cable, and Charles
Chesnutt.
Blacks in the Diaspora -- Claude A. Clegg III,
editor
Darlene Clark Hine, David Barry Gaspar, and John McCluskey, founding
editors
Martin Heidegger. Translated by Robert D. Metcalf and Mark B. Tanzer
Volume 18 of Martin Heidegger's collected works presents his important 1924 Marburg lectures which anticipate much of the revolutionary thinking that he subsequently articulated in Being and Time. Here are the seeds of the ideas that would become Heidegger's unique phenomenology. Heidegger interprets Aristotle's Rhetoric and looks closely at the Greek notion of pathos. These lectures offer special insight into the development of his concepts of care and concern, being-at-hand, being-in-the-world, and attunement, which were later elaborated in Being and Time. Available in English for the first time, they make a significant contribution to ancient philosophy, Aristotle studies, Continental philosophy, and phenomenology.
An Operational Assessment
John A. Adams
This engrossing and meticulously researched volume reexamines the
decisions made by Dwight D. Eisenhower and his staff in the crucial months leading
up to the Battle of the Bulge. In late August 1944 defeat of the Wehrmacht seemed
assured. On December 16, however, the Germans counterattacked. Received wisdom says
that Eisenhower's Broad Front strategy caused his armies to stall in early
September, and his subsequent failure to concentrate his forces brought about
deadlock and opened the way for the German attack. Arguing to the contrary, John A.
Adams demonstrates that Eisenhower and his staff at SHAEF had a good campaign
strategy, refined to reflect developments on the ground, which had an excellent
chance of destroying the Germans west of the Rhine.
Eric W. Osborne
The battle of Heligoland Bight was the first major action between the
British and German fleets during World War I. The British orchestrated the battle as
a warning to the German high command that any attempt to operate their naval forces
in the North Sea would be met by strong British resistance. Heligoland Island
guarded the entrance to the main German naval anchorage at Kiel. Fought on August
28, 1914, the engagement was complicated by dense fog, the piecemeal engagement of
German forces, and the unexpected appearance in the area of additional British
ships, which were hard to distinguish from foe. Initial British damage was
significant; however, fearing that the protracted battle would allow the bulk of the
German fleet to join the battle, the British brought in their battle cruiser
reinforcements and won the day, inflicting heavy losses on the
Germans.
The battle was significant for its political and
strategic ramifications for the two sides. The Germans became reluctant to engage
large forces in an attempt to gain a decisive maritime victory. After this defeat,
any plans for large-scale fleet operations had to be approved by the Kaiser, which
hampered the German fleet's effectiveness. This left the North Sea to Great Britain
for much of the war.
The Last Fleet Action
H. P. Willmott
"The Battle of Leyte Gulf was an extremely unusual battle. It was
unusual on five separate counts that are so obvious that they are usually missed. It
was unusual in that it was a series of actions, not a single battle. It was unusual
as a naval battle in that it was fought over five days; historically, naval battles
have seldom spread themselves over more than one or two days. It was unusual in
terms of its name. This battle involved a series of related actions subsequently
grouped together under the name of just one of these engagements, but in fact none
of the actions were fought inside Leyte Gulf.... More importantly, it was unusual in
that it was a full-scale fleet action fought after the issue of victory and defeat
at sea had been decided, and it was unusual in that it resulted in clear,
overwhelming victory and defeat." -- from Chapter One
The
Battle of Leyte Gulf -- October 22-28, 1944 -- was the greatest naval engagement in
history. In fact the battle was four separate actions, none of which were fought in
the Gulf itself, and the result was the destruction of Japanese naval power in the
Pacific. This book is a detailed and comprehensive account of the fighting from both
sides. It provides the context of the battle, most obviously in terms of Japanese
calculations and the search for "a fitting place to die" and "the chance to bloom as
flowers of death." Using Japanese material never previously noted in western
accounts, H.P. Willmott provides new perspectives on the unfolding of the battle and
very deliberately seeks to give readers a proper understanding of the importance of
this battle for American naval operations in the following month. This careful
interrogation of the accounts of "the last fleet action" is a significant
contribution to military history.
Anthony P. Tully
Surigao Strait in the Philippine Islands was the scene of a major
battleship duel during the Battle of Leyte Gulf. Because the battle was fought at
night and had few survivors on the Japanese side, the events of that naval
engagement have been passed down in garbled accounts. Anthony P. Tully pulls
together all of the existing documentary material, including newly discovered
accounts and a careful analysis of U.S. Navy action reports, to create a new and
more detailed description of the action. In several respects, Tully's narrative
differs radically from the received versions and represents an important historical
corrective. Also included in the book are a number of previously unpublished
photographs and charts that bring a fresh perspective to the battle.
Controlling the Gateway to the Adriatic in World War I
Paul G. Halpern
Called by some a "Mediterranean Jutland," the Battle of the
Otranto Straits involved warships from Austria, Germany, Italy, Britain, and France.
Although fought by light units with no dreadnoughts involved, Otranto was a battle
in three dimensions -- engaging surface vessels, aircraft, and subsurface weapons
(both submarines and mines). An attempt to halt the movement of submarines into the
Adriatic using British drifters armed with nets and mines led to a raid by Austrian
light cruisers. The Austrians inflicted heavy damage on the drifters, but Allied
naval forces based at Brindisi cut off their withdrawal. The daylight hours saw a
running battle, with the Austrians at considerable risk. Heavier Austrian units put
out from Cattaro in support, and at the climactic moment the Allied light forces had
to turn away, permitting the Austrians to escape. In the end, the Austrians had
inflicted more damage than they suffered themselves. The Otranto action shows the
difficulties of waging coalition warfare in which diplomatic and national jealousies
override military efficiency.
Edited by Peg Zeglin Brand
Emphasizing the human body in all of its forms, Beauty Unlimited expands the boundaries of what is meant by beauty both geographically and aesthetically. Peg Zeglin Brand and an international group of contributors interrogate the body and the meaning of physical beauty in this multidisciplinary volume. This striking and provocative book explores the history of bodily beautification; the physicality of socially or culturally determined choices of beautification; the interplay of gender, race, class, age, sexuality, and ethnicity within and on the body; and the aesthetic meaning of the concept of beauty in an increasingly globalized world.
The Riddle of Influence
Edited by Christine Daigle and Jacob Golomb
While many scholars consider Simone de Beauvoir an important philosopher
in her own right, thorny issues of mutual influence between her thought and that of
Jean-Paul Sartre still have not been settled definitively. Some continue to believe
Beauvoir's own claim that Sartre was the philosopher and she was the follower even
though their relationship was far more complex than this proposition suggests.
Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb, and an international group of scholars explore the
philosophical and literary relationship between Beauvoir and Sartre in this
penetrating volume. Did each elaborate a philosophy of his or her own? Did they
share a single philosophy? Did the ideas of each have an impact on the other? How
did influences develop and what was their nature? Who influenced whom most of all? A
crisscrossed picture of mutual intricacies and significant differences emerges from
the skillful and sophisticated exchange that takes place here.