-
10. Is there a Future for Chinese Indonesians?
- ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
- Chapter
- Additional Information
177 10 IS THERE A FUTURE FOR CHINESE INDONESIANS? Jamie Mackie Whatkindoffuturecanbeforeseeninthedecadesaheadofus,orhoped for,bytheChineseIndonesians(orSino-Indonesians,asIfeeltheywouldbe betternamed,byanalogywithtermssuchasSino-ThaiandSino-Americans)? Willitbesmootherthanthebumpyridetheyhaveexperiencedsince1945, orevenmoretroubledandinsecure?Nobodycanpossiblyknow,ofcourse; butsomeguessesmaybebetterthanothersanditisworthtryingtowork outwhichfactorsarelikelytoinfluencetheoutcomemoststrongly.Moreover, thetaskoftryingtoanalysehowfarcurrenttrendsarelikelytopersistor changeintheyearsahead(eventhoserootedfarbackinthepast)isitselfa challenging,andattimes,controversial,exercise,yetcrucialforanyserious attempttothinkabouttheirfuture. Forthatpurpose,myaimhereistostartbylookingatsomeofthe currentlyobservabletrendsthatarelikelytoexertanimpactonthefuture courseofethnicrelationsaffectingthesituationoftheSino-Indonesians(or SI,asIwillrefertothemhenceforth),thentoassesswhatmaybethemost probabledeterminantsofanyfuturecourseofeventsrelevanttothat,the leastdesirableaswellasthemost;finallytoconsiderwhatfactorsarelikely toinfluencepribumiattitudestowardstheSIand,conversely,whatkindsof responsesandattitudesarelikelytoemergeamongtheSIthemselves. Beforeembarkingonthosesubstantiveissues,however,Imustsay somethingaboutmyuseofsomeoftheterminologieshereandaboutthebasic 10Ethnic.indd177 9/9/084:45:41PM 178 Jamie Mackie reasoningthatunderliesmyownapproachtothissubject.1 Eventheadjective “Chinese”ortheterm“Sino-Indonesian”canbeproblematicsinceinthelast resort,itmustbeamatterofself-identificationbytheperson(s)concerned, aswasfoundbythedesignersofthe2000CensusinIndonesiawhenthey hadtoformulateaquestionabouttheethnicityofitsrespondentsforthefirst timesincethe1930Census.Itisnotjustamatterofone’snameorlanguage, orreligion,orsocio-culturalcharacteristics—whatGeertzusefullycalled “primordialloyalties”—althoughtheseareoftenusedasroughmarkersfor variouspurposes.2 Ontheotherhand,self-identificationisnotsimplyamatter ofsubjectivechoice;descentorancestryisacrucial,eveninescapable,factorin theequation.Manypribumi,perhapsmost,areinclinedtoseetheissuesimply inracialterms,unfortunately,andinmanycaseseventoregardtheSIstill asasing(aliens),not“realIndonesians”(asli),withoutadequatelyrecognizing thatnearlyallofthemarenowIndonesiancitizens,bornandeducatedin Indonesia,andthattheynowidentifythemselvesasIndonesiansratherthan Chinese,albeitofadistinctiveethnicstock.YettheirChineseancestryand culturalbackgroundisstillasourceofgreatpridetomostofthem,which theyarereluctanttoabandon—justasAmericansandAustraliansofBritish ancestrywereafewgenerationsback,orthoseofItalian,German,orPolish ancestry(andothers)intheU.S.,whoretainvaryingdegreesofpridein theirethnicbackgroundandculture.BecomingmoreandmoreAmerican orAustralianovertheyearshasnotentirelyeliminatedthat. Theoldnotionofa“meltingpot”whichwouldfusethemallintobroadly homogeneousAmericansorAustraliansinaprocessof“assimilation”has longagobeenabandonedasfallacious.Assimilationisawordwhichliterally implies“makingsimilar”insomevague,butoverarchingsense,analmost impossibledreamforimpoverishedimmigrantsinmostcases.Themany groupsof“hyphenated”Americans,Australians,orCanadians(andsimilar immigrantgroupsinmanyothercountriesinthiseraofmassinternational migration)whoretaintheirsenseofethnicoriginswhilebecomingfull- fledgedandloyalcitizensofthecountrytheyhavesettledin—aprocess called“multiculturalism”insomecountries,althoughitisnotanentirely satisfactoryterm,andhardlyappropriateatalltoIndonesia’suniquenation buildingoperation—provideuswithbetterexamplesofhowsuchgroups canbeabsorbedintothewidersocietyoftheirnewlandthandosuchterms as“melting-pot”or“assimilation”.Thenotionof“hybridity”isafeatureof manycountriesworldwideinthisageof...