-
5. Japanese Policy toward India
- ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
- Chapter
- Additional Information
60 CHAPTERFIVE JapanesePolicytowardIndia I POLICY-MAKERSINTOKYO JAPAN’SwartimeaimsinIndiawereneverasclearlydefinedasheraims inSoutheastAsia.Indiawasnotembracedinthegranddesignforthe GreaterEastAsiaCo-ProsperitySpherefirstconceivedin1940.Greater EastAsiawouldsweepthroughSoutheastAsiawestwardtotheIndoBurmese border.EverywhereinAsiaWesterncolonialrulewouldbe drivenoutandindependencemovementsencouraged.AsiaforAsians becamethegoalandshibboleth.TheGreaterEastAsiaCo-Prosperity Sphere would constitute an economically self-sufficient entity under Japanese tutelage. Both diplomatic and military means would be employedtorealizetheblueprint.ButJapanesemilitaryadministration wouldrespectexistinglocalorganizationsandcustoms.1 Bylate1941 controlofresourcesnecessaryforthewareffortbecameafocalpoint oftheplan. Still,IndiaborderedthewesternperimeteroftheGreaterEastAsia Co-ProsperitySphere.AndJapanwasatwarwiththecolonialpower occupyingIndia;BritainmustbeexpelledfromIndia.AsJapanwished toseeBritainpurgedfromAsiasoalsoIndiannationalistsaspiredto freeIndia.JapanhadtoreckonwithIndiaforthemutualadvantageof bothJapanandIndia. What agencies or individuals in Tokyo would do the reckoning? The Foreign Ministry was one obvious possibility. Japan had no ambassador in India under Britain, but there were consuls in the major Indian cities. InApril 1941, Consul-General Okazaki in Calcutta , in a secret communiqué to Foreign Minister Matsuoka, described the independence movement of the Forward Bloc, a radical 05IndNatArmy.indd60 4/21/084:36:30PM 61 partyinBengal.Okazakisuggestedestablishingcontactwiththisleftwing party in India and also with its leader, Subhas Chandra Bose, theninexileinBerlin.Goingevenfurther,hesuggested,“Weshould secretlytransportlargequantitiesofweaponsandsubstantiallyincrease the actual strength of the Forward Bloc.”2 While Okazaki felt the movementwouldburgeonintoagenuinelypopularrevolt,hefeltJapan should do her part by establishing contact with Bose and aiding his party.ThisearlyJapanesenoticeofBoseprecededbyseveralmonths Major Fujiwara’s remarks about Bose to the 8th Section, Second Bureau,IGHQ. From Ambassador General Ōshima Hiroshi in Berlin also came communiquésregardingtheIndianrevolutionaryBoseandhisdesire togotoEastAsia.InJanuary1941Bosehadalreadybeguntovisit Ambassador Ōshima and military attaché Yamamoto Bin in Berlin with plans for military co-operation with Japan against Britain in Asia. The Gaimushō (Foreign Ministry) then learned of the presence of Bose in Berlin and of his political significance from sources both in India and in Germany. The Foreign Ministry, however , refrained from any positive proposal regarding India or Bose during1941.Andwhenwarerupted,theinitiativeobviouslylaywith themilitaryratherthantheGaimushō. From within the Cabinet Prime Minister Töjö made several declarations of policy toward India in early 1942. These pronouncements werearticulatedinspeechesbeforetheDiet.Theyrepresented official policy aims toward India. The statements were made during the four-month interval from January to April, and the timing of the pronouncements suggested that by late March or earlyApril the fundamental lines of Japan’s India policy had already been drawn.3 The policy aims had yet to be implemented, and measures were lateradoptedtoimplementsomeofthegoals.Announcementsmade by Töjö during 1943 and 1944 were designed to realize earlier decisions. MajorpolicydecisionsonIndiaalsoemanatedfromLiaisonConferences and Imperial Conferences. Liaison Conferences included importantmembersofboththeCabinetandmilitaryhighcommand, includingthePrimeMinister,ForeignMinister,andArmyandNavy chiefs of staff and vice-chiefs of staff. The Liaison Conferences were inaugurated by imperial order in late 1937 to provide liaison between the Cabinet and military on crucial policy questions. For a time Conferences lapsed, but they were resumed in November 05IndNatArmy.indd61 4/21/084:36:30PM [3.135.219.166] Project MUSE (2024-04-18 16:03 GMT) 62 1940andcontinueduntil1944.4 AmajordecisionreachedataLiaison ConferencewasnotfinaluntilratifiedatanImperialConference, thatis,theLiaisonConferenceplustheEmperorandPresidentofthe Privy Council. This imperial ratification in effect made a...