We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR

Constitutions, Courts, and History

Historical Narratives in Constitutional Adjudication

By Renata Uitz

Publication Year: 2005

Emphasizes the role history and historical narratives play in constitutional adjudication. Uitz provocatively draws attention to the often-tense relationship between the constitution and historical precedence highlighting the interpretive and normative nature of the law. Her work seeks to understand the conditions under which references to the past, history and traditions are attractive to lawyers, even when they have the potential of perpetuating indeterminacy in constitutional reasoning. Uitz conclusively argues that this constitutional indeterminacy is obscured by 'judicial rhetorical toolkits' of continuity and reconciliation that allow the court's reliance on the past to be unaccounted for. Uitz' rigorous analysis and extensive research makes this work an asset to legal scholars and practitioners alike.

Published by: Central European University Press

Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF (145.5 KB)
pp. 1-3

Title page

pdf iconDownload PDF (60.0 KB)
p. 4-4

Copyright page

pdf iconDownload PDF (55.2 KB)
p. 5-5

Table of Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF (56.2 KB)
pp. 6-9

read more

Preface and Acknowledgements

pdf iconDownload PDF (31.3 KB)
pp. ix-x

Intuitively, at least for lawyers, the record book of history appears as a treasury of very sound points of reference. Precisely due to this reputation, constitutional review fora have a tendency to rely on references to history and traditions (historical narratives) in order to clarify or supplement constitutional provisions, to determine their proper scope of application, and sometimes even to substitute constitutional...

read more

Introduction. Constitutional Adjudication Haunted by Indeterminacy

pdf iconDownload PDF (138.7 KB)
pp. 1-16

Theories of constitutional interpretation and constitutional adjudication seek to establish a model of constitutional review which enables courts to respond even to hard cases without transgressing the limits of the legitimate exercise of the review power.1 In the course of this exercise one of the riddles used to be the countermajoritarian difficulty, as ex-...

read more

Chapter One. Historical Narratives in Constitutional Reasoning: Intuitions and Myths Revisited

pdf iconDownload PDF (335.7 KB)
pp. 17-62

References to history and traditions have acquired a curious reputation among lawyers for being objective and neutral points of reference, and thus for being capable of curbing indeterminacy in constitutional adjudication. When inquiring whether a new claim fits within the substantive range of the Due Process Clause, the U.S. Supreme ...

read more

Chaper Two. An Overview of Arguments Used in Constitutional Adjudication

pdf iconDownload PDF (271.8 KB)
pp. 63-110

In jurisdictions with a written constitution, the paradox underlying constitutional reasoning is relatively easy to identify. Constitutional provisions are phrased in a general manner: their open texture often offers little specific guidance for the resolution of particulars in con-stitutional claims. Despite fleeting indeterminacy in constitutional ad-...

read more

Chapter Three. The Constitutional Text in the Light of History

pdf iconDownload PDF (322.8 KB)
pp. 111-170

As demonstrated in Chapter Two, although often the constitutional text itself offers no readily available solutions to particular problems, the quest for legitimacy in constitutional adjudication finds refuge in the constitutional text. Theories of constitutional interpretation resort to the text of a constitutional provision as a yardstick to evaluate or ...

read more

Chapter Four. Behind Historical Narratives: The Promise of Continuity

pdf iconDownload PDF (317.6 KB)
pp. 171-234

The previous chapters sought to demonstrate that––despite lawyers’ intellectual reflexes––accounts of the past, history, and traditions are not hard facts to be taken at face value. Rather, accounts of the past (historical narratives) are the outcome of processes of interpretation. Lawyers’ accounts of the past as presented in constitutional cases are ...

read more

Chapter Five. The Fruits of Reconciliation: A Bittersweet Harvest

pdf iconDownload PDF (332.3 KB)
pp. 235-300

Chapter Four began an exploration of the normative premises under-lying courts’ reliance on historical narratives in constitutional cases. The examination targeted the rhetoric of continuity, inquiring how judge-made continuity rhetoric takes shape and, also, how such conti-nuity rhetoric contributes to shaping identities in polities operating ...

read more

Conclusion

pdf iconDownload PDF (84.6 KB)
pp. 301-308

The U.S. Constitution was drafted as a basic charter for a slaveholders’ polity. Slavery as the status quo of the day does indeed figure in the U.S. Constitution’s original language, such as in the Apportionment Clause calculating the basis of representation and taxation upon every free persons and three-fifths of all other persons.1 The only framer who ...

Bibliography

pdf iconDownload PDF (190.8 KB)
pp. 309-342

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF (79.5 KB)
pp. 343-354

Back cover

pdf iconDownload PDF (630.7 KB)
pp. 355-366


E-ISBN-13: 9786155053733
Print-ISBN-13: 9789637326387

Page Count: 366
Publication Year: 2005

Edition: 1st