-
1. Introduction: Nixon, Vietnam, and the Cultural Context
- Texas A&M University Press
- Chapter
- Additional Information
chap te r Introduction Nixon, Vietnam, and the Cultural Context Inmilitaryterms,thewarinVietnamendedinAprilof1975when NorthandSouthVietnamwereunifiedasonenation.Yetthecontinuing influenceoftheVietnamWarwasapparentinthe1989inaugural addressofPres.GeorgeH.W.Bushwhenhesaid,“Thatwarcleaves usstill....ThefinallessonofVietnamisthatnogreatnationcan longaffordtobesunderedbyamemory.”1 Despitehisplea,thewar’s influencepersisted,inpartbecauseofthethousandsofveteranswho wereinjuredordiedthereandinpartbecauseitsstoryhasbeentold andretoldbyjournalistswhoexperiencedit,USveteranswholivedit, andnovelistswhowroteaboutthewar,suchasTimO’Brien,author of Going after Cacciato and The Things They Carried.TheVietnam Warremainsapowerfulnationalmemorybecauseforthefirsttimein modernhistory,theUnitedStatesdiscoveredthat,despiteitsenormous resources,itspowerwaslimited,and,inspiteofgreatefforts,itwas unabletoimposeitswillonasmallAsiannation. ThedecisiontofocusonaspeechbyPres.RichardNixonisaresultof hiskeyroleinthewar’shistory.Twofigureswhohadopposedthewar— theRev.Dr.MartinLutherKingJr.andSen.RobertF.Kennedy—had beenkilledin1968byassassins.Pres.LyndonB.Johnson,althougheligible torunforre-election,chosenottodoso,inpartbecausemilitary [] introduction successandsuccessatthenegotiatingtableinParisstilleludedhim.Asa senator,VicePres.HubertH.Humphreyhadopposedthewar,butwhile heservedunderPresidentJohnson,hewascompelledtosupportthe president’spolicies.Accordingly,Humphreywastainted;USvotersdid nottrusthimtoendthewar.Instead,apluralitycasttheirballotsinthe hopethatRichardM.Nixonwouldfindawaytoachievepeace.Thus, thefocusofthisbookisonthespeechinwhichPresidentNixonoffered hisplantoendthefightingandtoachievewhatalwayshadbeenthe primaryUSgoal:thepreservationofSouthVietnamasanindependent nation. Nixon’sNovember3,1969,speechannouncedconsequentialand controversialdecisionsaboutthewar,anditsimportanceandimpact provokedseveralrhetoricalcriticstoanalyzeandevaluateit.Moreover, PresidentNixonconsideredithisbestspeech,amonghisotherbest efforts,the1952“Checkers”speechthatenabledhimtoremainthe vicepresidentialcandidateontheRepublicanticketandhisspeech resigningthepresidencyin1974,whichattemptedtoframetheway inwhichhispresidencywouldberemembered. ThisbookisnotabiographyofPres.RichardM.Nixon,althoughhis personalhistoryandhisrhetoricalexperienceinformedhisrhetorical andpresidentialchoicesonVietnam.2 Thisbookisnotahistoryofthe warsinVietnam,althoughIdevoteaseparatechaptertothehistoryof USinvolvementinitswarstoofferawidercontextforunderstanding theissuesthataroseduringtheNixonpresidency. Likeothersinthisseries,thisbookfocusesonasinglespeech, deliveredonNovember3,1969,byPres.RichardM.Nixon;however, nosinglespeechcanstandaloneandinanalyzingit,Irefertoearlier speechesthatpreviewedkeyelementsthatrecurinit.Ialsorefertothe speechhedeliveredonApril30,1970,announcingthe“incursion”of UStroopsintoCambodia.Notonlydiditechoargumentsmadeon November3,1969,buthealsocharacterizedthatdecisionasaneffort “toguaranteethecontinuedsuccessofourwithdrawalandVietnamization programs,”whichwerethepoliciesheannouncedonNovember 3.3 Thechoicetowidenthewar,eventemporarily,re-energizedantiwar protestors.InallofthespeechestowhichIrefer,Nixontalkedabout [18.217.194.39] Project MUSE (2024-04-25 04:31 GMT) [] chapter 1 hispoliciesforendingtheVietnamWar,andeachofthemfacilitates understandingtheargumentshemadeandthestrategiesheusedon November3,1969. Theeventssurroundingthatspeechhavefadedfromthememories ofmuchoftheUSpublic,butIlivedthroughthemasaprofessor teachingcoursesincommunicationstudiesatwhatwasthenCalifornia StateUniversity,LosAngeles,aschoolofconsiderablediversity,whose studentbodywaspredominantlynonwhiteandwhosestudents’average...