In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

CHAPTER 4 EDWARD I TO RICHARD II: STATUTES AND SOCIAL REVOLUTION SUMMARY PAGE Wtltminster the Setond 28 The Sta/llte and Similar Cases 28 BiIIlofExGeplions 29 The Nisi PrillS System 29 Edward I and Feudalism 30 EdwardII and Ihe Ordinances 31 EdwardIII: The Black Death 32 RichardII: The Peasants' Rrvoll - 32 We now come to a period of steady growth in the common law covering just over a century and a quarter (1272-1399). The reign of Edward I is marked by one of the greatest outbursts of reforming legislation in English history until the nineteenth century.l The first Statute of Westminster (1275) made numerous changes in procedure, many of them designed to protect the subject against the King's officers, for the evidence collected by the commission of inquiry set up in the previous year had revealed a good deal of oppression.2 The statute may be regarded in some ways as being a sort of supplement to the Great Charter, which was now fifty years old. The Statute of Gloucester (1278) made important amendments to the law of land, especially on the subjects of waste, curtesy and dower. The next year the great Statute of Mortmain did something tb check the feudal losses which resulted when land was given to churches, monasteries and corporate bodies, by completely forbidding all amortisation.3 In 1284 we have a remarkable statute re-stating the fundamentals of the common law for the information of sheriffs who were engaged in applying English law to the newly conquered land of Wales. This statute is so long that it almost amounts to a short treatise on the state of the law in 1284; its practical interest to historians is therefore considerable, for it contains information which is difficult to find elsewhere. 1 See genetally, Plucknett, Legislation ojEdward I (1949). I H. M. Cam, Slutlies;n tht HUI1Jred Roth, 36. I By a « secret of law " (Co. Lit. 99) the c!own dispensed with the statute; see WoodLegh , Chur.h Ufo liltder Edward Ill, 60 If. 27 28 THE CROWN AND THE STATE WESTMINSTER THE SECOND The next year (1285) saw an astonishing series of epoch-making statutes. Of these the first was the second Statute of Westminster, which leaves hardly a single department of the law untouched. Of its fifty chapters, the first is the famous De Donis of which we shall have much to say later on, for it lies at the foundation of the idea of legal estates in land. Among many others are the following important provisions. The common mode of fraudulently conveying land by allowing judgment to go by default in a collusive action brought for the purpose was checked (c. 4).1 The rights of joint-tenants and reversioners were given more prompt protection in such cases, and it was enacted that this device should not bar a widow's claim to dower. By chapter 11 a very stringent process was created for the action of account. In its origin it dealt with the relationship of the lord of a manor to his bailiff or estate manager, but as history proceeds it becomes a commercial as well as a feudal action, and the regular remedy lying between partners. The statute imposes imprisonment as soon as an accountant is found in default, and this penalty can be inflicted by the lord's auditors without the intervention of a court. Equally drastic is the penalty upon the sheriff or gaoler if such a prisoner escapes, for in such a case the gaoler shall be liable to the lord in the same sum as the accountant was. This perhaps,is a reflection of the insecurity of mediaeval prisons, which were by no means so massive as is sometimes thought. Chapter 18 established the writ of elegit whereby a judgment creditor could, as an alternative to the old fieri jtlCias, elect to take all the debtor's chattels and to hold half of his lands until the debt be levied out of the chattels and the rent. THE STATUTE AND SIMILAR CASES Chapter 24 contains the famous provision that- " whensoever from henceforth it shall happen in the Chancery that there is to be found a writ in one case, but not in another case although involving the same law and requiring the same remedy, the clerks of the Chancery shall agree in framing a writ, or else they shall adjourn the plaintiffs to the next Parliament, or else they shall write down the...

Share