The History of England Volume I

Foreword

HuVol1_ i-xl.indd 11 2/1/10 10:54 AM FOREWORD WHEN DAVID HUME began his History of England the undertaking came, not from any sudden resolve nor as an entirely new enterprise, but as one possibly contemplated thirteen years before, in 1739, probably attempted several times thereafter, and certainly considered, at least as a corollary discipline, in a philosophical discourse published in 1748. Even so, any concerted effort long sustained necessarily awaited appropriate conditions: all happily combining for Hume upon his election, january, 1752, as Keeper of the Advocates' Library in Edinburgh. With this appointment the author finally had "a genteeLoffice," ready access to a collection of some thirty thousand volumes, and, no less desirable , leisure indefinitely extended to pursue his research. Heretofore , by mere exertion of his own commanding intellect, philosopher Hume had more than once set forth what he perceived to be the "constant and universal principles of human nature." Now, as a philosophical historian, he could ascertain from dreary chronicles all the aberrations of human behavior as there exhibited in "wars, intrigues, factions, and revolutions." These and other vagaries , previously recorded simply as odd phenomena, in Hume's more coherent view constituted a varied range of "materials" documenting the "science of man." Once intent upon a history so formulated, the immediate question for this author was where to begin. In his own Life (an essay prefixed to the first, 1778, posthumous edition of the History and so reprinted here), Hume ingenuously speaks of being "frightened" away from the very start-that is, from the time of Caesar's invasion-and so at once passing over seventeen hundred years to "the accession of the House of Stuart [1603], an epoch when, I thought, the misrepresentations of faction began chiefly to take place." Indeed this was Hume's final decision, though he XI HuVol1_ i-xl.indd 12 2/1/10 10:54 AM XI I FOREWORD earlier admitted in a letter to Adam Smith, 24 September 1752, some inclination to commence with the preceding Tudor "epoch" [1485]. I confess, I was once of the same Opinion with you, & thought that the best Period to begin an English History was about Henry the 7'h. But you will please to observe, that the Change, which then happen 'd in public Affairs, was very insensible, and did not display its Influence till many Years afterwards. Twas under James that the House of Commons began first to raise their Head, & then the Quarrel betwixt Privilege & Prerogative commenc'd. The Government , no longer opprest by the enormous Authority of the Crown, display'd its Genius; and the Factions, which then arose, having an Influence on our present Affairs, form the most curious, interesting , & instructive Part of our History.... I confess, that the Subject appears to me very fine; & I enter upon it with great Ardour & Pleasure. You need not doubt of my Perseverance. For a historian tracing, in one period or another, the progress or decline of human welfare, the "influence" twice mentioned in the letter to Smith eventually required a "backward" narrative: from present effects to earlier precedents and then to causes earlier yet. Thus over the ensuing years Hume proceeded retrogressively , representing first the Stuart reigns (now volumes V-VI in this reprint), then the Tudors (III -IV), and finally all the "barbarous " times before Henry VII (1-11). Hence in surveying the development of this history, and the various reactions to its initial publication, we should remember that what Hume reports of his first two volumes (originally published 1754, 1757) is lastly conveyed here as V-VI (volumes not so designated until issue in 1762 of the "complete" edition). About his early work, so ebulliently described to Smith, Hume has much else to say, all of it in great confidence as to the rectitude and efficacy of his own procedure. To one friend he observes: "You know that there is no post of honour in the English Parnassus more vacant than that of History. Style, judgement, impartiality, care-everything is wanting to our historians; and even Rapin, during this latter period, is extremely deficient." To another he confides that he has "more propos'd as my Model the concise manner of the antient Historians, than the prolix, tedious Style of HuVol1_ i-xl.indd 13 2/1/10 10:54 AM XI I I FOREWORD some modern Compilers. I have inserted no original Papers, and enter'd...