In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

TABLE OF CASES Adams v. Kellogg, Kirby 438 (Conn. 1786), 152 Ames v. Kansas, 111 US. 449 (1884), 224 Bas v. Tingy, 4 US. (4 Dall.) 37 (1800), Ill, 120-24,250-51 Bayard v. Singleton, 1 Martin 42 (N.C. 1787),216,220-21 Bingham v. Cabbot, 3 US. (3 Dall.) 19 (1795), III Bors v. Preston, III US. 252 (1884), 224 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US. 483 (1954), 247 Brown v. llin Broom, 3 US. (3 Dall.) 344 (1797), III Calderv. Bull, 3 US. (3 Dall.) 386 (1798),111,187-88,221,227-30,231, 233-34,237-38 The Catherine, DECREE ON THE ADMIRALTY SIDE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW YORK (Evans no. 26,915: 1794) (D. N.Y. Jan. 28, 1794), 84 Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 US. (2 Dall.) 419 (1793), 55, 63-64,111, 188-97, 198-202,202-03,210,211-12,241,242,245,246,252 Clark v. Russel, 3 US. (3 Dall.) 415 (1799), 111 Cohens v. lirginia, 19 US. (6 Wheat.) 264 (1821), 202, 203-04 Cooper v. Telfair,4 US. (4 Dall.) 14 (1800), 225-27 Cmig v. Missouri, 29 US. (4 Peters) 410 (1830), 203 Cutting v. South Carolina, unreported (US. filed 1795), 204 Dunlop v. Ball, 6 US. (2 Cranch) 180 (1804), 9 Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee, 11 US. (7 Cranch) 603 (1813), 186 Farquhar v. Georgia, Manuscript Opinion, James Iredell Papers, Duke University (C.C.D. Ga. 1791), 188-89, 192 Fenemore v. United States, 3 US. (3 Dall.) 357 (1797), III Findlay v. The William, 9 F. Cas. 57 (D. Pa. 1793) (No. 4790), 82-83, 253 The Flying-Fish. See Little v. Barreme Folger v. Lecuyer, Boston Centinel, Jan. 4, 1794 (D. Mass. Dec. 6, 1793), 84 255 256 TABLE OF CASES Fowler v. Lindsey, 3 US. (3 Dan.) 411 (1799), 111 Fries, Case of. See United States v. Fries Georgia v. Brailsford, 2 US. (2 Dan.) 415 (1793), III Glass v. The Sloop Betsy, Maryland Journal and Baltimore Advertiser, Oct. 31, 1793 (D. Md. Aug. 16, 1793), affd., unreported (C.C.D. Md. Nov. 7, 1793), rev'd., 3 U.S. (3 Dan.) 6 (1794), 81, 83-87, 109, 112-13, 115,250,253 Grayson v. Virginia, 3 U.S. (3 Dan.) 320 (1796),190 Hamilton v. Eaton, 11 E Cas. 336 (C.C.D.N.C. 1796) (No. 5980), 100 Hans. v. Louisiana, 134 U.S.l (1890), 202 Hayburn's Case, 2 U.S. (2 Dan.) 409 (1792), 55, 177 Henfield's Case. See United States v. Henfteld Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 US. (3 Dan.) 378 (1798),190,195,202,203 Hylton v. United States, 3 U.S. (3 Dan.) 171 (1796), 101-05, 111, 185 Little v. Barreme, 6 US. (2 Cranch) 170 (1804), 124 Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), 122, 247 Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 US. (1 Wheat.) 304 (1816), 186--87 Miller v. Miller, 2 US. (2 Dall.) 1 (Fed. Ct. App. 1781), 86 Moodie v. The Ship Phoebe Anne, 3 US. (3 Dall.) 319 (1796), 23, 114 Moodie v. The Ship Alfred, 3 U.S. (3 Dan.) 307 (1795), 113-14 Moxon v. The Fanny, 17 E Cas. 942 (D. Pa. 1793) (No. 9895), 83 Olney v. Arnold, 3 US. (3 Dall.) 308 (1796), 184 Olney v. Dexter, unreported (US. 1796), 184 Ex Parte New York, No.1, 256 US. 490 (1921), 202 Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 22 US. (9 Wheat.) 738 (1824), 36, 42 Principality of Monaco v. Mississippi, 292 US. 313 (1934), 202 Respublica v. De Longchamps, 1 US. (1 Dan.) 111 (Pa. 1784), 131-32, 137, 141, 160 Rose v. Himely, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch.) 241 (1808), 86 Sims Lessee v. Irvine, 3 US. (3 Dan.) 425 (1799), 111 Swift v. Tyson, 41 US. (16 Pet.) 1 (1842), 162-63 Talbot v. Jansen, 3 U.S. (3 Dan.) 133 (1795), 111, 113 Triquet v. Bath, 97 Eng. Rep. 936, 3 Burr. 1480 (K.B. 1764), 132-33, 137, 140, 141, 160, 161 turner v. The Bank of North America, 4 U.S. (4 Dan.) 8 (1799), Ill, 243-45 United States v. Callender, 25 E Cas. 239 (C.C.D. Va. 1800) (No. 14,709), I 166-69, 172, 222 United States v. Cooper, 25 E Cas. 631 (C.C.D. Pa. 1800) (No. 14, 865), 166 [3.133.131.168] Project MUSE (2024-04-19 08:15...

Share