In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

appendix table a1. Radiocarbon Assays Chart Beta # Locale Conv (b.p.) Intcpt (a.d.) 2 Sigma (a.d.) 1 Sigma (a.d.) Analysis A1 54745 S44/E14 (42–53) 900±80 1160 990–1280 1030–1230 St. A3 54747 S40–41/E30.5–31.5 (30–40) 660±70 1300 1250–1420 1280–1400 St. C1 146200 W11.8/S8.7 (20–40) a 1080±40 980 890–1020 910–920 & 960–1000 AMS C2 146201 S7.7/W8.9/A11 (130) 560±40 1410 1300–1430 1320–1340 & 1390–1420 AMS C3 54748 S9.5/W7.7 (125) b 710±70 1290 1200–1400 1260–1300 St. D1 54742 N34–35/W25–26 (40–50) 970±60 1030 980–1200 1010–1160 St. D2 54743 N50–51/E6–7 (65–75) 870±80 1180 1010–1290 1040–1260 St. D3 54744 N38–39/W31–32 (100–110) 920±110 * 900–1290 1010–1240 St. E1 65944 S6–7/E36–37 (40–50) 980±70 1025 910–920 & 955–1210 1000–1155 Ext. E2 65943 N0/E17 (40–50) 820±50 1225 1055–1085 & 1150–1285 1185–1265 St. E3 65947 N2/E14 (10–24) 690±70 1290 1220–1410 1270–1310 & 1360–1385 Ext. E4 65946 N2/E14 (24–51) 1250±70 770 655–965 680–875 Ext. E5 65945 N0/E14 (51–53) 900±110 1160 910–920 & 955–1295 1015–1255 Ext. J1 146202 N295/W105 (20–30) 900±70 1160 1000–1270 1030–1220 Ext. J3 146204 N294/W105 (20–30) 990±110 1020 790–1270 970–1180 Ext. J4 103150 N295/W108 (30–40) c 1050±60 1170 1015–1265 1035–1220 St. K1 103149 T4 S5.40/W20.70 (40–45) 990±60 1025 970–1195 1000–1055 & 1090–1150 St. Questionable Dates A2 54746 N64–65/E18–19 (30–35) 3380±60 b.c. 1680 b.c. 1870–50 & 1780–1520 b.c. 1740–1610 Ext. J2 146203 N295/W106 (20–30) 1690±220 380 b.c. 170– A . D . 770 90–610 St. K2 103148 T2 (50) 5380±70 b.c. 4240 b.c. 4350–4015 b.c. 4330–4140 Ext. a C1 = T6/ Grp 1/A2; C3 = T5; b D3 Intercepts = a.d. 1060, 1080, & 1150; c J4 = Hearth Key: “Conv (b.p.)” = conventional date, b.p.; “Incpt (a.d.)” = intercept, a.d.; “Sigmas” = standard deviations; “St.” = standard radiometric analysis; “Ext.” = radiometric analysis with extended counting time; “AMS” = Accelerator Mass Spectography [3.144.233.150] Project MUSE (2024-04-24 14:31 GMT) chart a2. Radiocarbon Age Ranges for Late Prehistoric Sites in Costa Rica and Panama table a3. Artifacts from Looter Holes on the Panteón de La Reina Looter Red No Body Hole BAP1 Papayal Wares Ceiba ID2 Sherds Lithics MNI3 A - - - 4 - 28 - 1 B4 - - 100 - 16 33 2 3 C 2 - 3 1 17 173 7 3 D5 - - 3 3 - 48 3 2 E6 5 6 - 3 12 100 2 6 F7 34 - 34 66 - 305 1 3 I8 7 2 11 27 - 185 1 6 J9 9 21 1 4 - 136 3 4 K10 9 3 9 6 - 101 - 5 V11 50 - 69 97 3 286 4 25+ 1 BAP = Buenos Aires Polychrome. 2 No ID = Unidentified ceramic types. 3 MNI = Minimum Number of Individual ceramics. 4 The 100 sherds in“Red Wares”appear to come from a single vessel. 5 One solid tripod leg in collection. 6 Looter Hole E was large and likely comprised more than one looting activity, possibly more than one burial. A sartén handle and part of the pan were included in this lot. 7 Materials from this deposit consisted of eight bags containing 134 sherds, about half of them Ceiba, one quarter Buenos Aires Polychrome, and a quarter Red Wares. 8 Two additional hollow tripod legs, possibly Buenos Aires Polychrome, found in this lot. 9 One solid tripod leg, probably from a Papayal Engraved vessel, and three hollow tripod legs, one from a Fish Ware vessel, found in this lot. 10 Eight hollow tripod legs and two miniature vessel fragments found in this lot. 11 Estimates suggest there were 3 Buenos Aires Polychrome vessels, 10 Red Ware vessels, possibly 2 Ceiba vessels, 2 Ceiba-like miniature vessels, 1 Seúl Grabado vessel, 3 unusual sherds, and 1 plain vessel. In addition, the lot also included 1 spindle whorl, the figurine of the woman with a pot (see fig. 7.7), one stone flake, and 2 bags of fragments of a probable“jaguar”metate. ...

Share