In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

1 Introduction Identity, Memory, and Contestation in Europe David B. MacDonald and Mary-Michelle DeCoste During the eight years of the George W. Bush administration, Europe seemed to represent a more positive, prosperous, stable, and culturally enlightened antipode to the United States. A large volume of books during this period extolled the virtues of Europe, which was seen as the next superpower , a model of what countries could do when they put narrow national self-interest aside and worked together, promoted ethical forms of foreign policy, and maintained a strong welfare state. Sadly, by the time Barack Obama became president, the myth of an economically prosperous, stable, and progressive Europe was been shattered by the Greek bailout, economic problems in Italy, Spain, Ireland, and other countries, and fractious debates about monetary union. The rise of ultranationalism of the Pim Fortuyn or Jorg Haider variety during the 1990s and after also seemed to indicate that the European experiment was not working perfectly, and that lingering racism and xenophobia continued, despite decades of new myth-making. German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s pronouncement in 2010 that multiculturalism had “utterly failed” in her country, followed by negative reactions toward the phenomenon in other core EU countries, underscored the reality that European identity remains unsettled and contested, especially in an era of high immigration, low birthrates, a failed EU constitution, and the steady erosion of the welfare state. All this has come alongside ballooning debt and uncertainty about the limits of the eastward expansion of the Union, particularly toward religiously dissimilar states like Turkey. What it means to be European, however, has always been unsettled. What is Europe, and how can one define where it begins and ends? Our focus in this book is European identity, a crucial topic as Europe undergoes Introduction 2 a plethora of challenges. But what precisely does Europe mean? As Jacobs and Maier have argued, “positively, Europe can be defined as a jagged and ragged end of the Eurasian landmass. But there is no agreement at all where this part begins, and to call it a continent is certainly an abuse of language. To situate Europe geographically is therefore already problematic, but it is even more difficult to define Europe historically and culturally” (1998, 13). The focus on Europe as it is seen through its own eyes and through the eyes of the other (a label problematized by many of the chapters in this volume) in a variety of different kinds of texts helps us to understand the contested nature of European identities in the plural, as well as allowing us to engage with the shifting sands of identity contestation from inside and outside of Europe. The idea that there are many forms of identity competing with dominant homogenizing conceptualizations is at the root of this work. We agree with Thomas Risse’s view that “it is wrong to see ‘European’ identity as compared to national, regional, or local loyalties in a zero-sum fashion as either/or propositions. Individuals hold multiple identities and, thus, can identify with Florence, Tuscany, Italy, and Europe or with Munich, Bavaria, Germany, and Europe without having to face conflicts of loyalties. Which of these identities becomes salient or important in a given moment depends on the context in which people act” (2011, 2). The chapters presented here reflect the tensions and ambiguities about both what being European might imply as well as what not being European can mean. The book features sixteen chapters divided into four thematic sections, drawn from a selected group of Canadian, American, and European contributors. We as editors hope the thematic divisions will allow academic researchers and course instructors to easily find what will be of interest to them. Two key themes unite the chapters: first, the politics of identity construction involving self and other, and second, the politics of memory, that is, how history is understood and interpreted. Throughout much of European history, nations and states were formed on the basis of inclusive and exclusionary identity practices. Deciding the borders of the nation and demarcating identities was a crucial political project. In many cases, identities were defined both positively and negatively . On the positive side, Anthony D. Smith has noted the central importance of national myths, heroes and legends, and ideals of a “golden age” that national leaders strived to recapture from the eighteenth century in a wide variety of political projects. For Smith, nations are based on “an ideal of authenticity which presupposes a unique culture-community, with...

Share