In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Engaging South Korean Intellectuals 6 Although the United States formally supported what could at best be called a quasi-democratic system of government between 1961 and 1972 and even helped derail its opposition on key issues, Americans working on the ground in the Republic of Korea (rok) still hoped to broaden the scope of participation in national politics and pave the way for more genuine democracy . South Korea’s influential community of intellectuals became vital in this regard. U.S. officials thought that the involvement of scholars and journalists in the process of nation building would add legitimacy to the state’s development programs and encourage the country’s political evolution . By fostering enthusiasm for economic progress among Korean intellectuals , the Americans hoped to quiet a potential source of dissent while giving the government a reason to trust this key sector of the population and incorporate its insights into the decision-making process. But Americans also believed that for academics to become meaningfully involved in promoting national development, they would need new ways of thinking about the process. Official and private organizations made a concerted effort to stimulate discussions on development among leading South Korean intellectuals. They tried in particular to promote modernization theory, which offered a social scientific explanation of how emerging nationstates could develop their economies and political systems—a major preoccupation of U.S. social scientists during the Cold War. Americans hoped that studying modernization would instill in Korean scholars a new participatory ethos and enable them to play a more significant role in public affairs. Moreover, because modernization theory and its intellectual sibling, area studies, contained an intrinsic critique of Communism, Americans believed that it could foster a sense of nationalism that would not identify with North Korea. Many South Koreans came to share America’s enthusiasm for modernization theory, although they rejected its assumptions of Western superiority . The theory’s optimistic faith that any state could follow a path to national prosperity captured the imagination of these scholars, who themselves craved higher standards of living. Even while becoming deeply committed to studying and precipitating national modernization, however, intellectuals adapted the concept to their own aspirations and goals. They [164] Engaging South Korean Intellectuals eventually derived a hybrid conception of modernization that emphasized the possibility of achieving rapid socioeconomic change while preserving Korean traditions and culture. Although the idea of a distinctly Korean version of modernization did promote a dialogue between intellectuals and the state, the dialogue was short-lived. The state’s move toward greater authoritarianism in the late 1960s made exchanging ideas an increasingly one-sided process and divided the academic community. Some intellectuals continued to embrace the Park regime because its developmental agenda embodied their vision of a modernization process that differed from the one employed in the West. These scholars even provided some of the philosophical basis for the creation of the Yusin system. Other South Koreans, however, argued that even a distinctly Korean version of modernization needed to be accompanied by democratization and, as Park turned toward authoritarianism, became an important source of opposition to the regime. The Problem of Intellectuals and Modernization Theory The relationship between intellectuals and the state was a pressing concern to both the United States and the rok from the time Park gained power in 1961. Early connections between academics and the new regime were fraught with tension and boded ill for their long-term cooperation. The junta’s tight control of publishing and the media in the wake of the coup naturally alienated many intellectuals, and few, if any, scholars voluntarily assisted the revolutionaries. But Park had his own methods for mobilizing the academic community. On more than one occasion he sent armed soldiers into classrooms or offices of professors whose assistance he desired and then forced them to work on various committees. Park coerced academic experts in constitutional law and politics to help draft a temporary constitution and many of its emergency decrees.∞ Intellectual alienation from the regime peaked in the summer of 1963, when Park flirted with the possibility of postponing the elections he had promised to hold that year until 1967. American officials felt that an irreparable rift between the government and the country’s intellectuals was being created. In a report written at the time about the most influential South Korean journal, Sasanggye, they warned that a group of ‘‘younger Korean politicians and intellectuals in opposition to the Military government has been coalescing...

Share