The Riddles of the Fourth Gospel: An Introduction to John

Bibliographic Appendix

271 Bibliographic appendix W hile my overall views on John’s riddles and how to address and interpret them are laid out in this book, the discussions above are not as detailed as my fuller treatments of themes elsewhere. Therefore, in addition to pointing the reader to other publications in the notes, this bibliographic appendix provides a guide to other places where I have addressed these issues more fully— both in terms of engaging the secondary literature and providing fuller discussions of Johannine texts. The additional bibliography below augments the select annotated bibliography above, pointing the interested reader to other published sources where these theories are developed in further detail. For fuller treatments of important subjects, see the following works: Engagements with scholarship: Literature reviews of John’s Christology and composition are found in Christology (Anderson 1996, pp. 1–69); literature reviews of historicity and John are found in Quest (Anderson 2006, pp. 1–37). An overall review of Johannine scholarship in the last several decades was published in Expository Times (Anderson 2008a). Engagements with reviews of Christology were published in Review of Biblical Literature (Anderson 1999a), a reception report on the cognitive-critical analysis of Gospel traditions was responded to by James Fowler (Anderson 2004a), a response to reviews of Quest was published in The Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism (Anderson 2009b), and responses to other reviews of Christology were included in the epilogue of its third printing in Anderson 1996 (third printing, 2010, pp. 330-58). 272 Bibliographic Appendix A review of literature on Qumran and the Fourth Gospel was published in a collection of essays on that theme (Anderson 2011). theological treatments: John’s theological issues, the flesh/glory of Jesus, the Father’s relation to the Son, tensive relations between signs and faith, present and future eschatology, John’s sacramentology and ecclesiology, etc., are covered extensively in Anderson 1996, and the epistemological origins of John’s christological tensions are explored further in the Bauckham/Mosser collection (Anderson 2008b). Cognitive-critical approaches to Gospel traditions are first laid out in Anderson 1996 pp. 137–69, and are taken further in the Psychology and the Bible collection (Anderson 2004; 2004a; 2004b). John’s Mosaic Agency Christology is developed most fully in the Semeia issue on the Father in the Fourth Gospel (Anderson 1999). The Johannine Prologue and its theology are treated in further detail in the NIDB essay on “Word” (Anderson 2009b; see also 2008b). Historical treatments: Analyses of the Johannine community and situation are treated in a variety of sources: Anderson 1996, pp. 119–27 and 194–251; 1997; 1999; 2005; 2007a; 2007b; 2007d; 2008; 2008b; 2009a; 2010. Aspects of Johannine historicity are treated in the essay in the Charlesworth collection (Anderson 2006b), Anderson 2006, pp. 43–99, and extensively in the John, Jesus, and History volumes (Anderson 2007; 2009; see also 2010a). The historical Jesus in the Fourth Gospel is treated in the Quaker Religious Thought essays (Anderson 2000a; 2002a), the Psychology and the Bible collection (Anderson 2004b), Anderson 2006, pp. 127–73, and the Bible and Interpretation essays (Anderson 2010c; 2010d). Literary treatments: Source, redaction, and composition theories are covered most extensively in Anderson 1996, pp. 1–166. The dialogical autonomy of the Fourth Gospel is introduced in Anderson 2006, pp. 37–41, and developed further in Anderson 2008. A Bi-Optic Hypothesis and a theory of interfluentiality (mutual influence among Gospels ) are developed in a variety of places: Anderson 2001; 2002; 2006a; 2007c; 2009b; 2010b; 2010d. 273 Bibliographic Appendix Rhetorical features of the Johannine narrative, drawing in the work of Mikhail Bakhtin, are developed in several places: Anderson 1996, pp. 194–97; 1997, pp. 17-24; 2007b. The purpose of the Fourth Gospel is addressed most comprehensively in Anderson 1999. Interpretive treatments: Interpretive essays include treatments of faith (Anderson 2007e), truth and power (Anderson 2007f), and leadership and church unity (Anderson 2005). A dialogical reading of the Fourth Gospel is developed in Anderson 2008. additional Works by Paul n. anderson 2011. “John and Qumran: Discovery and Interpretation over 60 Years.” Pages 15–50 in Mary Coloe and Tom Thatcher, eds., The Fourth Gospel and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Atlanta: SBL. 2010a. “Acts 4:19-20—An Overlooked First-Century Clue to Johannine Authorship and Luke’s Dependence upon the Johannine Tradition.” Bible and Interpretation , September 2010. online: http://www.bibleinterp.com/opeds/acts357920. shtml. 2010b. “From Mainz to Marburg—A...