In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

200 chaptEr 9 are the parameters in which an approach to justice that acknowledges the difficulties of identifying any subject as a member of a “limited world” in the current global conjuncture must be developed. Contemporary forms of subjectivity as well as the production processes that give rise to them are not simply delimited but also internally crossed by boundaries and borders. it is crucial not to forget that these processes of the production of subjectivity are bound to but equally capable of challenging global capitalist dynamics. The difficulties in defining labor skills and their ramifications for mutations of citizenship are doubtless only one symptom of the intangibilities confronted by systems of measurement that attempt to reduce human aptitudes, forms of life, systems of conduct, and so on to quantifiable elements. it is perhaps here that we find the reason for the expansion of points-based systems and other techniques to ever more finely calibrate and hue the unlimited reserve of potentiality held in the materiality of laborpower . The inescapable return of the immeasurable in these very schemes is at once a register of the ungovernable element that pertains to labor-power and the excess of justice. it is in this crossing, this unavoidable encounter with the immeasurable in a world obsessed with statistics, rankings, calculations, and probabilities, that we locate the most fertile ground not only for the rethinking of justice but for new practices of struggle that might emerge from it. The border is a site where this kind of crossing and encounter is occurring every day. rEfErEncEs Anderson, B., and M. Ruhs. 2008. A Need for Immigrant Labour? The Micro-Level Determinants of Staff Shortages and Implications for a Skills Based Immigration Policy. Migration Advisory Committee. Available at http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/ sitecontent/documents/aboutus/workingwithus/mac/239769/andersonand ruhs2008. Anggraeni, D. 2006. Dreamseekers: Indonesian Women as Domestic Workers in Asia. Jakarta: Equinox. Balibar, É. 2004. We, the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship. Princeton , NJ: Princeton University Press. Banerjee, P. 2010. Borders, Histories, Existences: Gender and Beyond. New Delhi: Sage. Becker, G. S. 1992. “An Open Door for immigration—The Auction.” Wall Street Journal , October 14. Benhabib, S. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Bigo, D. 2005. “Globalized (in)Security: The Field and the Ban-Opticon.” in Traces 4, Translation, Biopolitics, Colonial Discourse, 34–87. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. Bigo, D. and E. Gould, eds. 2005. Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement into and within Europe. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. bordErscapEs of diffErEntial inclusion 201 Caggiano, S. 2006. Lo que no entra en el crisol: Inimigración boliviana, comunicación y procesos identidarios. Buenos Aires: Prometeo. Castles, S. 2006. “Back to the Future? Can Europe Meet its Labour Needs through Temporary Migration?” Working Paper No. 1. Oxford: international Migration institute. Chan, K. W. 2008. “internal Labor Migration in China: Trends, Geographical Distribution and Policies.” United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Population Distribution, Urbanization, internal Migration and Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Secretariat, New york, January 21–23. Chiswick, B. R. 1982. “The impact of immigration on the Level and Distribution of Economic Well-Being.” in The Gateway: U.S. Immigration Issues and Policies, edited by B. R. Chiswick, 289–313. Washington, DC: American Enterprise institute for Public Policy Research. Chomsky, N. and M. Foucault. 1971. Human Nature: Justice versus Power. Available at http://www.chomsky.info/debates/1971xxxx.htm. Cole, P. 2000. Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration. Edinburgh , UK: Edinburgh University Press. Cuttitta, P. 2007. Segnali di confine: Il controllo dell’immigrazione nel mondo-frontiera. Milano: Mimesis. De Genova, N. P. 2004. “The Production of Mexican/Migrant illegality,” Latino Studies 2: 160–185. ———. 2006. Working the Boundaries: Race, Space, and “Illegality” in Mexican Chicago. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. ———. 2010. “The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement.” in The Deportation Regime, edited by N. P. De Genova and N. Peutz, 1–29. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. De Genova, N. P. and N. Peutz, eds. 2010. The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Derrida, J. 1994. Force de loi. Paris: Galilée. Düvell, F. and B. Jordan. 2002. Irregular Migration: The Dilemmas of Transnational Mobility. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. ———. 2003. Migration: The Boundaries of Equality and Justice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Ferrarese, M. R. 2006. Diritto sconfinato: Inventiva giuridica e spazi nel mondo globale. Rome: Laterza. Foucault, M...

Share