Dramatic Experiments: Life according to Diderot

Preface

Preface It is generally agreed that Denis Diderot, the eighteenth-century philosopher , dramatist, art and drama critic, encyclopedia editor, and novelist, is one of the fundamental figures not only of the French enlightenment, but of what we have come to understand as post-enlightenment modernity in general. What is less clear is why. If Kant, for example, is the philosopher who inaugurated modern philosophy by transforming ontology into phenomenology, overcoming the major modern divide between Rationalism and Empiricism, articulating the mystery of the conditions of a realm of objectivity without transcendence, or if Rousseau is the inaugurator of modern sensibility, the philosopher who paradigmatically posed the question of political theory and morality for the age of democracy, who exactly is Diderot, and wherein lies his uniqueness? Though occupying an important place in a variety of fields, from philosophy, to the history of the biological sciences, to literature, theater, and art criticism, Diderot seems to have never found his place, to have never really belonged. This book aims to articulate a place for Diderot, or more precisely, to articulate the significance and radical nature of his essential not-belonging. Diderot does not exactly belong, the book claims, precisely because he is the first major thinker of an essential non-belonging, the first major thinker of what I call positive alienation. Thinking and the problem of alienation have always been related. Thinking starts with alienation. Yet the traditional task of thinking, from Plato to Rousseau, has been to articulate a condition of alienation in relation to un-alienated or prelapsarian state. Diderot marks a momentous change: alienation is no longer seen as something to be overcome; there is no envisaging of an un-alienated state. Rather, alienation is essential and constitutive. The self is originally and fundamentally not itself, or beyond itself. It contains as an intimate and internal “part” of what it is an excess foreign to it, that is, foreign to its capacity to fully be itself. Rather than try to overcome this alienation or excess, the thinker now tries to overcome the false theorizations that posited it as secondary in relation to an un-alienated state, those theorizations to which we can apply the general term “Metaphysics.” If the self is essentially alienated, it means that it does not fully belong to itself, cannot fully be in possession of itself. This fundamental non-belonging is Diderot’s xi xii PREFACE great discovery, and it inaugurates a tradition of ex-centric (i.e., positively alienated) thinkers from Schlegel to Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Freud, Artaud, Lacan, and Deleuze. It is no accident that in this eccentric tradition, the question of theater and drama takes, so to speak, center stage. The thinker of positive alienation is a new type of thinker that I will call a dramatic thinker. It is important to recall that, for metaphysics, drama has traditionally been viewed as a fundamental expression of the human tendency to fall into alienation, to become, like the actor, other than himself. As such, drama was harshly criticized by Plato as well as by Rousseau. In contrast, the dramatic thinker who comes into being with Diderot understands the dramatic moment and the question of theater as fundamental and internal to the very act of thinking. The Paradox of the Actor is one of Diderot’s most paradigmatic texts precisely because the actor, the one who knows how not to be him/herself, becomes the figure for the new type of thinker that Diderot introduces. The thinker of positive alienation, with Diderot, becomes also a thinker who uses images in a radically new way, or someone who establishes a new relation between thinking and the image. No less than drama, the image has been traditionally accused of being a deceptive double, an alienating power that lures an un-alienated origin away from itself. Diderot, by consensus one of the first great modern theoreticians of painting and thus of the image, transforms the very function and understanding of the image. He uses images at key points in his arguments so that, instead of pointing to an un-alienated origin, they become positive elements embodying an original alienation that they help us grasp, accept, and happily activate. Diderot’s images work against the West’s iconoclastic tendency. At his profoundest, this book thus claims, Diderot is an unprecedented dramatic, imagistic thinker who revolutionizes the very task of thinking. I locate the crux of his writing’s novelty in the way that the questions of drama and of...