The Intercorporeal Self

Acknowledgments

ACkNOwLEdgmENTS In Phenomenology of Perception, Maurice Merleau-Ponty remarks on the strange manner in which we discover, in a kind of unending process, the patterns of our own thinking only by letting it find its expression in the context of our relations with others. He writes, “There is . . . a taking up of others’ thought through speech, a reflection in others, an ability to think according to others which enriches our own thoughts” (PhP, 179/208). The process of writing a book, which is inevitably a reflection of many conversations , collaborations, helpful comments, criticisms, and suggestions, is particularly exemplary of this philosophical insight. There are a great many people to whom acknowledgment is due, and any list is sure to be incomplete. I would like to express my particular gratitude to John Russon, who has been an inspiring and challenging teacher, mentor, and friend to me. His comments and reflections on this manuscript have been crucial to its development. I am grateful for John’s work as a gifted philosopher and teacher, and also for his efforts in organizing an ongoing philosophical conversation among a group of scholars who have been meeting, for a number of years now, a few days each summer, in Toronto. It has been my privilege to participate in a number of these ‘Toronto Seminars’ to discuss the works of Merleau-Ponty, Derrida, Hegel, Heidegger, Plato, and Fichte. The list of participants in these conversations over the years includes Ömer Aygün, Don Beith, Noah Moss Brender, Susan Bredlau, David Ciavatta, Peter Costello, Bruce Gilbert, Jill Gilbert, Shannon Hoff, Kirsten Jacobson, Kym Maclaren, David Morris, Alexandra Morrison, Gregory Recco, and Maria Talero. These conversations have shaped my own approach to the practice of philosophy as well as my interpretation of Merleau-Ponty, and I am grateful to all of them. My exploration of the relationship between Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology and Derrida’s ‘deconstruction,’ reflected in chapters 4 and 5 of this book, began with a paper that I presented at the Collegium Phaenomenologicum in Città di Castello, Italy, in 2006. I am grateful to the coordinator of that year’s Collegium, Michael Naas, and to those participants and faculty who have shared insights and helpful comments in the course of an ongoing philosophical conversation. I am thinking, in particular, of Bryan Bannon, ix x ACkNOwLEdgmENTS Maxime Doyon, Donald Landes, and François Raffoul. My exploration of the relations between Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy, cognitive science, and naturalism, reflected in chapters 1 and 3 of this book, began in conversations with Andrew Bailey. His thoughtful approach to my questions and ideas stands, for me, as a model of open-minded philosophical dialogue. Several people have offered detailed suggestions and comments on versions of the manuscript as a whole. Kirsten Jacobson’s very insightful and helpful suggestions motivated and guided my attempts to clarify some key passages. I would also like to express my appreciation for the way in which her work effectively demonstrates the pertinence of Merleau-Ponty’s analyses of embodiment and spatiality to a number of issues and debates in contemporary empirical research on child development, gender, mental health, and politics. I am grateful to Leonard Lawlor for his comments and encouragement as well as for his many excellent books and articles on Merleau-Ponty, Husserl, Derrida, and contemporary French philosophy. His work as an interpreter of the continental tradition and as a philosopher has made a deep impression on me, and I can only hope that this is reflected in the pages of this book. I am grateful to Kym Maclaren for her comments , questions, and suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript as well as for her work as a phenomenologist and scholar of Merleau-Ponty. Her insights on expression, intersubjectivity, self-consciousness, and development have significantly informed my work on these issues. Thanks also to Jeff Mitscherling for his helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. I would also like to thank Jay Lampert and Graeme Nicholson for their work as extraordinarily gifted teachers and philosophers, as well as for their friendship and encouragement. Lawrence E. Schmidt and Bernard Hammond are two mentors and long-time friends whose approaches to the vocation of teacher and scholar give powerful expression to their abiding concerns for justice and the Good. I am deeply grateful for both of them. I want to gratefully acknowledge the support of my family, especially my sisters, Laura Ogden and Tracy Fleet. I acknowledge the Social Sciences...