In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

TABLES Table 2.1 HUD AMFI Table for Somerset County and Prince George’s County, Maryland 14 Table 2.2 Income Eligibility Limits for HUD Programs 15 Table 2.3 Net Budget Authority for Selected HUD Programs, 1977–2000 27 Table 2.4 Outlays for Housing Assistance, Selected Programs and Total, 1977–2000 28 Table 2.5 Net New Commitments for Renters and Home Buyers Receiving Direct Housing Assistance Administered by HUD, by Type of Subsidy, 1977–2000 30 Table 2.6 State Housing Appropriations and Trust Funds, 2000 38 Table 2.7 States with Trust Funds, but No Other Direct Appropriation 41 Table 2.8 States without Housing Appropriations or Trust Funds 42 Table 2.9 Sources of Housing Agencies’ Operating Funds 43 Table 2.10 State-Sponsored Housing Programs 45 Table 2.11 Agency Sources for Funding State Housing Programs 45 Table 2.12 Sampling of State Housing Agency Programs Supported by State Funding Sources 46 Table 3.1 The First Wave: State Housing Finance Agencies Created 1960–1972 52 Table 3.2 The Second Wave: State Housing Finance Agencies Created 1973–1980 53 Table 3.3 The Third Wave: Housing Finance Agencies Created 1981–1992 54 Table 3.4 Private Activity Bond Use, Comparison of the Case Study States 59 vii Table 3.5 LIHTC: State Authority, Requests, and Allocations, 1998 64 Table 3.6 Policy Initiation in the States as Viewed by Housing Agency Officials 73 Table 3.7 Responsibility for Decision Making in the States 74 Table 4.1 Maryland, Minnesota, and Texas in Comparison, 2006 76 Table 4.2 Summary of MHFA Bonds and Appropriations, 1971–1988 79 Table 4.3 Texas Households with Housing Need by Income Group 91 Table 4.4 Texas Households by Income Group 92 Table 5.1 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Housing Programs, FY 2003 114 Table 5.2 State-Funded Programs in Maryland, 2000–2002 118 Table 5.3 Business Types and Employment Assisted through DHCD’s Neighborhood Business Development Program, 1998 123 Table 5.4 Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs Programs, 2003 125 Table 6.1 State Comparisons: Maryland, Texas, and Minnesota, 2006 135 Table 6.2 Summary of State Housing Problems 139 Table 6.3 Comparison of Funding: Maryland, Texas, and Minnesota Housing Agencies 142 Table 6.4 State Appropriations per Person Below Poverty Level 144 Table 6.5 Project Evaluation Criteria for Allocating LIHTC in Maryland, Texas, and Minnesota 147 Table 6.6 Common Strategies Used by State Housing Agencies 153 Table 6.7 Is Housing an Economic Development or a Poverty Issue? 160 Table 7.1 ADDI Accomplishment Report—Maryland, Minnesota, and Texas 169 Table 7.2 Housing-Related Tax Expenditures, 2002 181 Table 7.3 Estimated Distribution of Housing Subsidies by Income Quintile, 2002 181 viii TABLES ...

Share