publisher colophon
  • Page 513Multiple Efforts

The first four months of 1873 witnessed another eruption of inventive activity by Edison. In terms of successful patent applications and technical notes, his productivity rate equaled that of the first half of 1872, but whereas printing telegraphy spearheaded his 1872 outburst, duplex telegraphy led the early 1873 efforts. In the midst of this explosion and just a week after Edison’s birthday in February, his wife, Mary, gave birth to a daughter, Marion (“Dot”).1 Despite the new family responsibilities, two months later Edison left for England to demonstrate his automatic telegraph system for the telegraph department of the British Post Office.

As 1873 opened, Edison’s relationship with Western Union grew more intimate as his design of duplex and related circuits increased. Early in the year he had many diverse approaches in multiple telegraphy to offer Western Union. He continued to explore them, recording in his notes a large number of variations on those general designs while adding further approaches to those under consideration. Norman Miller, secretary and treasurer of the Gold and Stock Telegraph Company, served as an intermediary between Edison and Western Union president William Orton and helped open negotiations for support and control of Edison’s inventions in this field, for it was one in which Western Union’s interest was growing. By the middle of February, Edison had met with Orton and presented a selection from his designs. In several meetings they discussed potential improvements in multiple telegraphy—including diplex as well as duplex possibilities— and in instruments such as relays. They reached a verbal agreement that involved an explicit intention to cover the field andPage 514 protect Western Union’s patent investments. This allowed Edison to use Western Union facilities in New York to test his instruments.2 He drafted the resultant patent applications in late March and in April. When he left for England on 23 April, he gave Miller the power of attorney to sell the duplex telegraph patents to Western Union, but the company neither purchased these inventions nor reached a formal agreement with Edison concerning his relationship to the company.

While duplex designs dominated Edison’s interests at this time, he maintained his style of pursuing several lines of work simultaneously. He executed several patent applications related to earlier inventions in printing telegraphy and continued manufacturing printing telegraphs at the Ward Street Shop of Edison and Murray in Newark. He also began making notes for a proposed book on telegraphy and electricity. However, automatic telegraphy demanded increasing attention and soon opened international vistas for the prolific American inventor-entrepreneur.

Key figures in the Automatic Telegraph Company had encouraged British interest in the company’s system since the time Britain had nationalized its telegraph industry and incorporated the existing system of land lines into the British Post Office. As early as 1870 Daniel Craig had corresponded with Frank Scudamore, superintendent of the telegraph department of the British Post Office, seeking to enlist his interest in George Little’s automatic telegraph. Thereafter representatives of Automatic Telegraph had continued to promote the system with Scudamore.3 Because company president George Harrington had extensive interests in Edison’s inventions, Automatic Telegraph took increasing notice of his improvements to the system, and Harrington promoted Edison’s automatic inventions in Great Britain. Accordingly, Edison agreed to make a trip to England to test his automatic telegraph system. Prior to his trip, he continued to improve circuit designs4 and also renewed his interest in a system of romanletter automatic telegraphy after signing an agreement with Harrington and Josiah Reiff to develop such a system. Production of automatic instruments was consolidated at Edison and Murray, which acquired much of the equipment formerly used at the American Telegraph Works.5

Advertising card of the Automatic Telegraph Co.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

1. Page 515Marion Edison birth record, Returns of Birth CE:362, Division of Archives and Records Management, Department of State, Trenton, N.J.

2. The exhibits, testimony, and arguments in the Quadruplex Case (TAEM, reels 9 and 10) provide the best coverage of Edison’s arrangement with Western Union in connection with multiple telegraphy.

3. The promotion of the Little and Edison systems is detailed in ATF. On the British trip, see Chapter 12 introduction.

4. See U.S. Pats. 141,774, 147,312, 147,313, 147,314, and 156,843.

5. Some automatic telegraph production appears to have been shifted to Edison and Murray by November 1872, and the American Telegraph Works appears to have ceased operations at the beginning of January 1873. Cat. 1221:10-15, Accts. (TAEM 21:314-16); Cat. 1219, Accts. (TAEM 21:704-86 passim); 73-003, DF (TAEM 12:1000-1034); Cat. 1183:201-15, Accts. (TAEM 20:458-66); Cat. 30,108, Accts. (TAEM 20:448-49).

  • Edison and Murray Balance Sheet

[Newark, January 1, 1873]1
[Itemized Assets] [Total Assets]
Shafting:2 about 3700 lb at 10c $ 370.
Pulleys: 180 at $3 540.
Belting assorted 4201 ft 890.46
Standing Machinery:—
2 Shiers3 134.
4 Punch presses4 1200.
1 Drop & i screwpress5 91.
26 Mill Machines6 4525.
3 Index7 " ", with Vise & Centres 690.
10 Screw Machines8 4617.
4 Drill Presses 775.
7 Engine Lathes9 1821.
25 Stewart & Fitchburg lathes10 2120.

Page 516

66 Chucks (fitted)11 1005.
1 Gould shaper12 295.
53 Parker Vices13 304-75
7 Slide rests14 284.
4 Grindstones 100.
2 Grinder Frames 133.
Polishing Machinery 250.
88 “ Wheels 440.
3 Forges & 6 Anvils 222.
2 Blowers15 43.
19,049.75 19,049.75
Working tools & fixtures:—16
Screw Machine tools 1500.
1 lot Gear Cutting tools 300.
1 lot Tools cutting mills 45.
Lathes tools & chisels 95-6o
Files 115.
Drills 94-77
1 Set Key17 tools 800.
1 Set Stock Printer18 tools 4000.
1 Set Universal19 " " 3000.
Unfinished Relay & Sounder tools 250.
10,200.37
$31,050.58a
Carried forward $31,050.58
Shop tools & fixtures:—
Small machinery, bench tools,
office fittings, Stools, boxes for work,
lacquers, & drugs, etc, etc. 2196.78
6 Stoves & pipes 140.
Mill Mach, pans 99.12
Benching & drawers 298.50
Other woodwork fitted 990.
$ 3724.40 $ 3724.40
Raw Stock 1922.45
Part finished Stock 6219.35
Scrap Stock 577-50
Models & Finished Insts. 2557-92
Insurance 300.00
Automatic Tel. Co. D[ebto]r. 2031.20
Exchange Tel. Co. Dr 65.18
E Wrigley Dr 7.76

Page 517

[Itemized
Liabilities]
Wm. Unger C[redito]r. By Mortgage20 10,000.00
" " " By Interest on same 350.00
" " " By Edison’s notes 3,500.00
Gold & Stock Tel Co.21 Cr. 5,473-70
Macknet & Wilson Cr. 50.15
Holmes Booth & Haydens Cr. 17.03
C. A. Dehart Cr. 3-78
J H Thomas Cr 17.76
Williams & Plum Cr 18.68
Kirk & Co Cr 79.40
Kirk, W H. (Rent)22 Cr 541.66
Chas. Walker Cr 3-50
Bell & Co Cr 5.20
Geo. Price Cr 4.
Hopperton Cr 5.98
$20,070.90 $48,455.92a
Carried forward $20,070.90 $48,455.92
Jacob Gauch Cr 7.40
Frasse & Co. Cr 8.41
C B Smith Cr 20.
A Hayden Cr 152
Duerr & Morehouse Cr 12.75
S. S. Thorne & Co. Cr 309.80
D. Meeker Cr 36.64
A J Davies Cr 4-05
E N Wrigley23 399-75
Gas 38.68
C Batchelor (Back pay) 233.
CDean ( " " ) 407.72
Roberts24 125.
J. T Murrey (old Ledger) 625.78
$22,301.40 $22 301.40
[Net Worth] $26,154.52

D, NjWOE, Accts. Cat. 1219:1 (TAEM 21:705). Written by Charles Batchelor. “End of page.

1. This inventory appears at the beginning of an 1873 account book. Two of the creditor balances in the second half of the document date it precisely: Edison and Murray received an invoice from A. J. Davis for $4.05 dated 31 December 1872, and the balance in their account with the Automatic Telegraph Co. changed from $2,031.20 on 2 January 1873 (72-019, DF [TAEM 12:957, 314]; Cat. 1221:10, Accts. [ TAEM Page 518 21:314])- Several of the bills listed here were paid on 6 and 7 January 1873 (Cat. 1183:217-18, Accts. [TAEM 20:967-68]). Many of the creditors listed here are also found in Doc. 269. They supplied primarily machinery, tools, metals, leather, and hardware. Most were located in Newark or New York City; they can be identified in Holbrook’s Newark City Directory 1872, in Wilson 1872, or from their billheads.

2. In a nineteenth-century machine shop, power was transmitted from a steam engine or waterwheel by means of horizontal, rotating overhead shafts that ran through the shop and were connected to the machines on the shop floor by leather belts that moved in vertical loops.

3. Shears are metal-cutting power tools. This and the definitions of machinery in the rest of the notes in this document are from Knight 1876-77.

4. A punch press punches holes in metal.

5. A drop press is a form of power hammer used for forging metal; a screw press (e.g., an early printing press) tightens by means of a large screw.

6. Milling machines shape metal the same way planing machines shape wood—the work is fastened to a bed that moves under a rotating cutting blade. Milling machines are important tools for finishing forged, stamped, or cast pieces.

7. An index is an indicator such as a dial marked with numbers; on a milling machine it indicates the position of the cutter.

8. A screw machine is a lathe especially adapted for making screws.

9. An engine lathe is a large, all-purpose lathe.

10. Stewart lathes were manufactured by the firm of James Stewart’s Son, a lathe-making company in Newark. The maker of Fitchburg lathes is unknown. 70-006, DF (TAEM 12:165, 170); 71-014, DF ( TAEM 12:512).

11. A chuck holds work in a lathe.

12. E. & R.J. Gould was one of Newark’s leading tool and machinery manufacturers. A shaper operates like a milling machine (n. 6) except that the work is held fast and the cutter moves. This shaper came to Edison and Murray from the American Telegraph Works. Ford 1874, 73-74; 72-004, DF (TAEM 12:688); 72-014, DF (TAEM 12:873); 73-003, DF (TAEM 12:1001).

13. Made-by C. Parker of Meriden, Conn. 70-002, DF (TAEM 12:45).

14. Slide rests hold cutting tools on lathes.

15. Blowers are power-driven devices that supply air to the forges.

16. Manufacturers usually had a special set of tools for each instrument they made, including jigs to guide machines; gauges to check work; cutting blades for milling machines, shapers, and lathes; and fixtures to hold each piece in place as the work was being done. The first four entries in this list are for standard tools; however, the key, stock printer, universal printer, relay, and sounder tools and fixtures were designed to shape specific individual parts and were probably useless for other work.

17. Morse telegraph key.

18. Universal stock printer.

19. Universal private-line printer.

20. See Doc. 264.

21. The source of this debt is not clear from extant records. 72-017, DF (TAEM 12:895); Cat. 1221:2, Accts. (TAEM 21:312).Page 519

22. See Doc. 270, n. 5.

23. Ibid., n. 6.

24. Ibid., n. 7.

  • From Lemuel Serrell

New York, Jan. 27th 18723a

Dear Sir.

In the matter of your application for patent on District Alarm Apparatus, 1 the Patent Office will declare an interference after the usual preliminary statements are filed, giving the history and date of your invention.2 The time for filing these statements has been extended to March. 15 on account of Mr. Calahan’s absence.3

If you will get these facts together and give them to me some time when you are at my office, I can prepare your affidavit. Yours truly

Lemuel W. Serrell pr. Walker.4

L, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 12:1184). Letterhead of Lemuel Serrell. a“New York,” and “1872” preprinted.

1. U.S. Pat. 146,812.

2. Edison’s application was rejected on 28 December 1872 as having been anticipated by Edward Calahan’s U.S. Patent 129,526. On 31 December, Edison requested an interference, which was granted and ultimately decided in Calahan’s favor. Edison amended his 28 December application and assigned the resulting patent to the American District Telegraph Co., which controlled the Calahan patent. Pat. App. 146,812; Digest Pat. E-2:225.

3. Calahan was in England, serving as electrician for the Exchange Telegraph Co.

4. Probably George Walker.

  • To Norman Miller 1

[Newark, January 1873?]2

I have struck a new vein in duplex telegraph; “no balance” works well enough in shop to order set made.3 Think t’will be success.

Two messages can be sent in same direction. In opposite directions.4

Way Stations can work on it and everything be made happy. My shop is so full of non-paying work that I should like to saddle this on W.U. shop, where they are used to it.

Called to see Mr. Prescott5 at 4 P.M. Left.

PL (transcript), NjWOE, Quad. 71.2, p. 13 (TAEM 10:228).

1. Norman Miller was at this time Edison’s liaison with Western Union on multiple telegraphy. Edison’testified that this note was directedPage 520 to Miller. Quad. 70.7, p. 269, and 71.1, pp. 248-49 (TAEM 9:501, 10:131); Miller to Edison, 10 Dec. 1875 (TAEM 13:212).

2. Edison testified that he wrote this note before his trip to England in 1873 but was uncertain about its exact date. Its content suggests a January or early February date. Edison and Orton indicated that they had spoken in the fall of 1872 on the subject of Western Union’s interest in duplex telegraphy. With this note Edison sought to spark Western Union’s interest. He speaks of his designs as new in type; after the middle of February he had already demonstrated such devices at Western Union.

3. In duplex telegraphy a “no balance” method represented a different approach from the common “balance” methods. In the latter, the transmitter’s relay was kept neutral by electrically offsetting (“balancing”) in some manner the effect of the transmitted signal so that the relay could respond to an incoming signal (see Doc. 283). One of Edison’s “no balance” methods employed two different types of electrical signal on the circuit at the same time: current strength and polarity. See head-note, pp. 31-32; and Docs. 23, 28, 285, and 315.

4. This was a claim for both a duplex and a diplex, but as a choice of one or the other rather than both at once. Cf. Doc. 50.

5. Prescott was Western Union’s electrical expert. See Doc. 148, n. 4.

  • Technical Note: Multiple Telegraphy

[Newark, c. February 1, 1873]1

Duplex2 Statica

Impvts in defence of electrical warfare.b


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

The magnets in the balancing or compensating circuit are used for the purpose of generating an after current due to the demagnetization of the iron core, which current is very powerful and by regulation made equal to the static return charge many times greater than is possible to equalize by a condenser.3 magnets when properly placed are the sworn enemiesPage 521 of static currents whether dynamic or in a muscle twisting mode.4c

AX, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 297:64 (TAEM 5:663). “Written in pencil, slightly above the line of the previous word; the bulk of the document is in blue ink. bCancellation done in black ink. c“I” overwritten at bottom center of page, but nothing has been identified as a possible further page for this document.

1. This is a draft for the design “Duplex No 9” in Doc. 285. It was probably prepared around the time Edison proposed that Western Union support his work on multiple telegraphy and got his drawings ready to show Orton. See Doc. 282.

2. The design here uses the current in the circuit loop on the left to compensate for, or negate, the effect of outgoing signals on the main relay, in the center of the drawing (see headnote, pp. 31-32; and Docs. 28, 282, and 301). The outgoing line is not shown here; it would run up from the upper right end of the relay-magnet’s coil in the center of the drawing. Exactly how the arrangement was to work is not certain but can be partially clarified through comparison with design 9 in Doc. 285, and Doc. 306. Cf. also Doc. 22.

Steams’s duplex telegraph with a condenser.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

3. The problem of “static return charge” (or “kick”) in overland duplex telegraphy was first coped with adequately by Joseph Stearns’s innovation (U.S. Pat. 126,847), which Western Union bought and began using in 1872 (see Doc. 50, n. 3). Stearns inserted a condenser—a device to accumulate and store electric charge—into the artificial line so that it could match the electrostatic capacity of the main line and thus could counteract the effect of the kick as well as the signal on the relay, leaving the relay able to respond to only incoming signals. In Edison’s design extra electromagnets were arranged to try to do the same thing.

4. The meaning of Edison’s distinction is unclear.

  • William Orton to Norman Miller

New York,a February 6, 1873.

Dear Miller:

Say to Edison that I am ready to treat for his duplex, and that he may set it up in our office at any time. 1 Also that I shall be glad to consider his other propositions.2 Very truly yours,

Willm Orton.b

Page 522PL (transcript), NjWOE, Quad. 71.2, p. 10 (TAEM 10:212). aOriginal on letterhead of President Orton. b“M” printed at bottom center of transcript.

1. See Doc. 282. The meeting led to a verbal agreement between Orton, acting for Western Union, and Edison, the nature and details of which were a subject of intense, protracted litigation (see Quad, passim [ TAEM, reels 9 and 10]). Whatever the exact terms, Edison was given the chance to test experimental apparatus on Western Union lines at off-peak hours, working at the Western Union headquarters in New York City, and Western Union bore the expense of patent applications. In return, Western Union got at least a first chance to purchase any resulting patents.

2. The nature of these other projects may be indicated in Doc. 303. Exactly when Edison made the proposals is not known.

  • Technical Note: Multiple Telegraphy

Newark. N.J. Feby. 15. 1873.

Mr. Serrell Patent Solicitor

Please file following testimony of invention in Duplex Telegraphy. 1

The fundamental principle of Duplex Telegraphy2 is the neautralization of the effect of the outgoing battery upa the receiving instrumentb

The next important device is the destruction of the effect of the static charge of the line3 upon the receiving instrument.c

The minor essentials are, simple devices for placing the battery off and on the line, and a quick and convenient compensator.d

I shall describe a large number of modes on which I am now experimenting preparatory to obtaining Patents. 4

Duplex No 15


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 523Duplex No 2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

An Instrument may be inserted at X with proper resistance to prevent the spark and the key made to do what the sounder now does.7 The spring G is so adjusted the the shunt is not disconnected until the return static charge flows through it.8

Duplex No 4.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 524Duplex No 5. 9


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Duplex No. 6.10


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Duplex No 711


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Duplex No 812


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 525Duplex No 9c


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

X magnets are placed in the compensating circuit so that when the main and local battery are taken off the magnts will give an inductive charge equal to the static charge of the line.13

Duplex No 1014


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 526Duplex No 11 15


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Duplex No 1216


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 527Duplex No 13 17


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Four-plex No 14

Why not.18


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 528Duplex No 15. 19


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Duplex No 16.20


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 529Duplex No 17 21


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

AD (photographic transcript), MdSuFR, RG-241, Nicholson v. Edison, Testimony and Exhibits on Behalf of T. A. Edison, pp. 222-38. Another copy is in Quad. 71.2 (TAEM 10:212-26). ‘The letters “on” are added here in another hand, most likely at a later date. b“(at the sending stations)” added here in another hand, as in textnote a. c“(at [------]the line stations)” added here in another hand, as in textnote a. d“(?)” added here in another hand. ‘Dashed underline added to “9” later.

1. “Duplex” is used as a general term here, covering what would be known as diplex and quadruplex telegraphy as well (see “Four-plex No 14”). These notes were probably intended to be the basis for drafting a caveat but apparently were never sent to Serrell (Quad. 70.7, pp. 257, 328 [TAEM 9:495, 531]). They are related to material contained in a small notebook Edison prepared for his talks with William Orton concerning Western Union support for the development of these inventions. It is not known whether that notebook (no longer extant) contained the same number of designs as this set of notes, but the resulting trials of actual apparatus on Western Union lines involved a larger number than is found here. When applications for patents were drawn up in the wake of those tests, the patent agent involved for most of them was Munn & Co. rather than Serrell (see Docs. 302-11 and 314-16). For related drawings see also Docs. 275-79, 283, 286, 294, 297-301, and 312, and materials referred to in the notes to those documents, particularly material from Cats. 297, 30,099, and 1176, Lab. (TAEM 5:424, 997; and 6:1).

2. Cf. Edison on the same point in Doc. 301. See also headnote, pp. 31-32; and Doc. 28.

3. See Doc. 283.

4. The “descriptions” in most of the following cases consist of only a single drawing, and in those drawings the message-receiving aspect of the design is generally left incomplete, showing only the relay instead of the local circuit and sounder the relay would operate. In all but one instance (“Duplex No 16”) only one end of the circuit is shown; actual operation would require identical equipment at the other end of the line as well.Page 530

5. Cf. “Duplex No 1” and “Duplex No 2.” Possible earlier versions of these are Cat. 297:2(3), 15(1) verso, Lab. (TAEM 5:431, 497). Cf. Docs. 297, 302, and 304-5; and Cat. 1176:42, Lab. (TAEM 6:44).

6. Cf. “Duplex No 3” and “Duplex No 4.” A possible earlier drawing of these designs is Cat. 298:48(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:97). Cf. Docs. 298, 301, 306, and 314; Cat. 297:154(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:995); Cat. 30,099:288, Lab. (TAEM 5:1066); and Cat. 1176:41, Lab. ( TAEM 6:43)-

7. The sounders in these designs were used as transmitting switches, controlled by a key rather than having the key serve directly as the switch. In this drawing the sounder is the device in the middle with a short magnet coil, as distinct from the relay, with its longer coil, shown at the upper left.

8. This refers to “kick”; see Doc. 283, n. 3. G is directly above X.

9. For an explanation of this design see the very similar one in Edison’s U.S. Patent 178,223. For examples of earlier work related to this design see Doc. 13; Cat. 298:48(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:97); and Cat. 1176:11, Lab. (TAEM 6:13).

10. Cf. Docs. 305 and 312; and Edison’s U.S. Pat. 178,222.

11. Cf. Cat. 297:21(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:515); Cat. 1176:19, 35, Lab. (TAEM 6:21, 37); and Edison’s U.S. Pat. 131,334.

12. Edison executed a similar patent application on 22 April 1873 and later incorporated it into U.S. Patent 147,917. Related drawings are Cat. 298:71(1), 134(1), Lab. (TAEM 5:133, 262); and Cat. 297:3(6), 5(3), 16(2), 16(4) recto and verso, 18(1-5), 29(4), 32, 60(1), 80(1), 82(1), 85(4), 87(4) verso, 128(3), Lab. (TAEM 5:433, 445, 502, 505-6, 511-12, 547, 553, 639, 751, 764, 785, 796, 911).

13. Cf. the designs here numbered 10-12 and 14. See Docs. 22, 283, and 308, and the materials cited in connection with Doc. 312. Cat. 297:59(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:638) includes a related drawing and the following canceled line in Edison’s hand: “Did you see Mr. Orton about Patents”.

14. For an account of the operation of this system see Doc. 311. For related material see drawings F and G in Doc. 297; Cat. 297:5(4), 23(4), 37(1), Lab. (TAEM 5:443, 523, 565); and Cat. 1176:42, 51, Lab. (TAEM 6:44, 52).

15. See Doc. 308; Cat. 297:3(2), 5(2), 59(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:433, 443, 638); Cat. 1176:43, 52, Lab. (TAEM 6:45, 53); and U.S. Pat. 130,795.

16. For an explanation see Doc. 310 and U.S. Patent 178,221. Cf. Docs. 30,47,49, and 297; Cat. 298:133(3), 134(1), Lab. (TAEM 5:261—62); Cat. 1176:43, Lab. (TAEM 6:45); and Prescott 1877, 823-24.

A bridge duplex design.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

17. This is close to the basic pattern of a bridge duplex, clear cases of which go back as far as Maron’s 1863 design (Prescott 1877, 790). The term is a reference to the type of circuit known as a Wheatstone bridge (Maver 1892, 122-30). When the currents in two branches of a circuit are appropriately balanced or matched, no current will flow in a “bridge” connection between them. A bridge duplex employs this principle, putting the relay in a bridge to eliminate the effect of outgoing signals upon it while allowing it to receive incoming signals. Cf. Doc. 309; patent application “Case No. 97,” Quad. 70.6, pp. 63-64 and illustration facing 64 (TAEM 9:364-65); Cat. 297:1(1), 10(1), 75(3), Lab. Page 531(TAEM 5:427, 468, 727); and Cat. 1176:43, 52, Lab. (TAEM 6:45, 53).

18. This is the earliest dated document showing Edison’s work on quadruplex telegraphy and his use of diplexing as an addition, rather than an alternative, to duplexing. The label and the presence of two keys indicate that the device was designed to operate as a diplex and thus, by combination with features allowing duplexing of each of the diplex signals, to transmit and receive two different messages each way simultaneously. However, it is not clear exactly how this arrangement was supposed to operate. The possibility of putting together both samedirection and opposite-direction double-signal systems had been envisaged several times before (Prescott 1877, 829, 833-34), and Edison worked on, or at least considered, a variety of such designs in this period. Cf. the devices employed here with the designs 9-11 above and in Cat. 1176:51, Lab. (TAEM 6:52). Cf. also Docs. 286 and 300; Cat. 297:4(5), 37(2). 78(3) verso, 80(4) verso, 81(3), 85(3), 86(1), Lab. (TAEM 5:439, 570. 743. 755. 760, 784. 786); Cat. 30,099:277-78, Lab. (TAEM 5:1072); Cat. 1176:13, Lab. (TAEM 6:15); and U.S. Pat. 207,723.

19. The precise operation intended here is not clear, though it evidently involved electromagnetic induction to activate the polarized relay, which acted as the receiving apparatus. Cf. the designs numbered 6 and 12 above and the materials cited there. The idea for this design could well date back to the summer of 1872; see Cat. 297:3(7), Lab. (TAEM 5:436), which is written on the back of a document dating from before 30 July 1872.

20. For an account of the working of a similar design see U.S. Pat. 162,633 and Prescott 1877, 822-23. Cf. Docs. 88, 275-78, 294, 297, 300, and 315.

21. This design is based on changing the responsiveness of the relay by moving part of the “keeper”—that is, the iron connecting the cores of the coils into a single U-shaped magnet. Edison designed such a relay in the spring of 1872 (U.S. Pat. 134,868). Possible earlier versions of this design are found in Cat. 297:15(3), 16(1), Lab. (TAEM 5:496, 502).

  • Technical Note: Multiple Telegraphy

[Newark, c. February 15, 1873]1

To be testeda

No 18.2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 532No 19.3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Nob 20.4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

No 21.5


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Noc 226


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Nod 227


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 533AX, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 298:135, 134 (TAEM 5:267, 266, 264, 265); resemblances in style, paper, and ink, as well as content, link these separate scrapbook items. aWritten on back of page containing drawings “No 18.” and “No 19.”; on the front is the letterhead of Western Union. bStarts new page, also on letterhead of Western Union. cFigure label smeared, possibly as a cancellation. dStarts new page; letterhead cut off.

1. It is not clear whether these drawings were produced soon after Doc. 285 or were part of a prior set of drawings from which that document derives.

2. Cf. “Duplex No 1” and “Duplex No 2” in Doc. 285.

3. Cf. “Duplex No 6.” in Doc. 285.

4. Cf. the incomplete and full “No 22” designs in this document.

5. Cf. Doc. 297.

6. This and the following drawing “No 22” are apparently versions of a diplex or quadruplex design (cf. Cat. 297:1[1], Lab. [TAEM 5:428]). This is one of many such designs from this period, some of which eventuated in U.S. Patent 207,723. See “Four-plex No 14” in Doc. 285.

7. In Doc. 292 Edison referred to testing twenty-two multiple telegraphy designs in this period, but in Doc. 303 the number he gave was 23. In any case the tested designs may well have included some not illustrated here or in Doc. 285. Many of these designs can be found with other numbers on them elsewhere in the Miscellaneous Shop and Laboratory Notebooks (TAEM, reel 6). Some related designs have higher numbers, indicating that more than twenty-two or twenty-three existed, but it cannot be determined whether they were tested. See Cat. 297:18, Lab. (TAEM 5:511-12).

  • Frotn Marshall Lefferts

New York, 26. Feby 1873a

Dr Sir

You will construct for this Company 100 One hundred— “Universal Private Line Printers” to be first class in workmanship and to embrace the improvements as arranged for1 —the whole to be made like sample Machine to be deposited in this office—

We will pay you One hundred & twenty dollars for each Machine. Yours truly

M. Lefferts Presdt

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 12:1006). Letterhead of the Gold and Stock Telegraph Co. ‘“New York,” and “187” preprinted.

1. This order, entered in an Edison and Murray daybook on 27 February, was later canceled. See Cat. 1214:29, Accts. (TAEM 21:578).

  • To Norman Miller

[New York or Newark, February 1873]1

Mr. M.:2

Want order go in WU. nights to feel the pulse of my patients.3

Edison.

PL (transcript), Quad. 71.2, p. 11 (TAEM 10:227).

1. Edison testified that this message was sent in February 1873. Quad. 70.7, p. 258 (TAEM 9:496).

2. Edison’s testimony identifies Miller as the recipient. Ibid.

3. Having reached an agreement to test and develop various multiple telegraphy arrangements using Western Union lines (“my patients”), Edison found he needed a pass in order to be allowed into the appropriate parts of the Western Union headquarters building in New York City after hours. He experimented at night because traffic on the lines was lightest then. Ibid.

  • ELECTRIC PERFORATOR Doc. 289

In early 1873 Edison patented a perforating mechanism that used electromagnets rather than muscle power to punch holes in the paper tape for automatic telegraph transmission. 1 Designed to use the same keyboard as his original, large perforator,2 this mechanism was intended to solve two problems that characterized the earlier machine. First, by substituting simple electrical circuits for the original complicated series of cams and levers, the new design avoided the constant mechanical problems that plagued the large perforator.3 Second, this arrangement was “less fatiguing to the hand and arm”4 because the operator no longer had to supply the power to punch the holes. This last consideration was particularly important if the machines were to be operated by young girls, whose lower-priced labor was considered essential to reducing the costs of automatic telegraph systems.5

This was the only electric perforator patented by Edison and was apparently never used, perhaps because of the difficulty of developing sufficient power in the electromagnets to punch the tape cleanly.

1. Edison had filed a caveat for a similar perforator on 26 July 1871 (PS [TAEM Supp. III]). See also the drawings in PN-71-00-00 (TAEM Supp. III); and Doc. 151 A.

2. U.S. Pat. 121,601.

3. An 1872 article in the Telegrapher (by George Harrington’s brother-in-law William Barney) describes the mechanical problems of Edison’s perforator. Account records from early 1872 indicate that perforator parts were shipped to telegraph offices in New York, Washington,Page 535 and Philadelphia. Barney 1872; Josiah Reiffs testimony, 1:415, Box 17A, Harrington v. AtSP; 71-004, DF (TAEM 12:274-81); PN-71-09-05, Accts. ( TAEM 20:171-86).

4. U.S. Pat. 141,775, p. i.

5. See, for example, Docs. 144 and 148; and Craig 1872.

  • Patent Model: Automatic Telegraphy 1

[Newark, March 7, 1873?2]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

M (28 cm × 17 cm × 8 cm), MiDbEI, Acc. 29.1980.1402.

1. See headnote above.

2. Edison executed the covering patent application on this date (Pat. App. 141,775). Although many other existing patent models are functioning instruments made of metal, this model is made of wood.

  • Page 536SIPHON RECORDER Doc. 290

The following automatic telegraph receiver embodies primarily the ideas delineated in a notebook entry of 28 July 1871.1 The chemical solution for moistening the paper tape was kept in a small reservoir, from which a siphon fed it through a pen point to the paper. As the paper absorbed the solution, it moved under two wire points between which the incoming signal passed. In the patent application accompanying the model shown in Doc. 290, Edison claimed that this receiver would minimize the use of chemicals by applying the solution in a thin line at the center of the paper tape and passing the receiving signal immediately through it. However, that idea had already been patented, so Edison then altered his application to claim for himself the placement of the wires that marked the paper.2 With the two wires placed close together, just the narrow strip between them needed to be moistened. Moreover, placing the two wires on the same side of the paper, and thereby having the signal go across the surface of the paper rather than through it, avoided the intermittently high resistance that resulted when the solution failed to penetrate the paper consistently.

1. Doc. 180.

2. Commissioner of Patents to TAE, c/o Serrell, 14 Apr. 1873, and TAE, per Serrell, to Commissioner of Patents, 13 May 1873, Pat. App. 141,774.

  • Patent Model: Automatic Telegraphy 1

[Newark, March 7, 1873?2]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 537

1. See headnote above.

2. Edison executed the covering patent application on this date (Pat. App. 141,774). Like the model for Edison’s electrically powered perforator (Doc. 289), this model is made of wood.

  • Power of Attorney to George Harrington

New York, March 14, 1873a

Whereas Letters Patent in Great Britain under the great seal thereof were duly granted to Henry Edward Newton 1 of London, England, as a communication from George Harrington of the City and State of New York, United States of America for “Improvements in Mechanism for perforating paper for transmitting messages” which Letters patent are dated June 10th A.D. 1872 and numbered 1,751:2

And Whereas Thomas Alva Edison of Newark in the State of New Jersey, United States of America has invented certain “Improvements in Circuits and instruments for chemical telegraphs” 3 for which he has made application for Letters Patent in Great Britain:

And Whereas the above recited Letters Patent numbered 1751 was obtained, and the application for Letters Patent for “Improvements in Circuits and instruments for chemical Telegraphs” as above set forth was made with the full understanding between the said Thomas Alva Edison and the said George Harrington parties hereto that the benefits and advantages in and to all of said inventions and Letters Patent already granted and applied for should be held and enjoyed mutually in the proportion of one undivided third part to the said Edison and two undivided third parts to the said Harrington,4 and the expenses in connection with the same have been duly paid pursuant to such agreement

And Whereas it has also been understood and agreed that the said George Harrington should be entrusted entirely with all negotiations and proceedings connected with the introduction of the said inventions and improvements and the sole and exclusive right and power to negotiate and effect sales in connection with such inventions and Letters Patent:

Therefore in consideration of the premises, the said George Harrington is hereby made constituted and appointed the sole, exclusive and irrevocable attorney of the said Thomas Alva Edison to act in connection with the said inventions, improvements and Letters Patent, to attend to the introduction of the same in Great Britain, to negotiate for the sale of the whole or any portion of the right or rights in or under Page 538said Letters Patent already issued or applied for, to execute any and all contracts, assignments, deeds, transfers, licenses, or other documents and to receive any and all payments, license fees, royalties, Stock, bonds or other valuable consideration for any such rights or privileges and to give full and ample receipts for the same and to execute in the name or in behalf of the said Edison any written instrument that may properly be required for carrying out the full intent and meaning of these presents:

And the said Edison does hereby release and relinquish to the said Harrington any and all right to act in the premises and agrees that the rights and powers hereby conveyed shall be held and exercised by the said Harrington, his substitute or Attorney or his heirs or Executors as fully and entirely as he the said Edison could have held or exercised the same:

And furthermore that he the said Edison his heirs or assigns is only entitled to require of the said Harrington or his legal representatives a just and true accounting for and paying over of one third part of the net profits that may be realized from and in connection with the aforesaid inventions and Letters Patent in Great Britain.

In Witness whereof I, the said Thomas A. Edison have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal this fourteenth day of March Anno Domini 1873, in the City of New York, State of New York, United States of America.

GThomas Alva Edison    Geo Harrington

Witnesses David G. Barnitz Gerard W. Vis.5

DS, NjWOE, LS (TAEM 28:953). Written by David Barnitz. aPlace and date taken from text; form of date altered.

1. Unidentified. On British patents, see Chapter 7 introduction, n. 2.

2. Equivalent to U.S. Patent 121,601.

3. British Patent 735 (1873) comprised U.S. Patents 135,531, 141,773, and 141,776 and one other circuit (fig. 14 in the specification).

4. See Docs. 109 and 155.

5. Unidentified.

  • To Norman Miller 1

[Newark or New York, c. March 15, 1873]2

I have tried to date with make-shift instruments, seven duplex, between New York and Boston.3 Six of them worked charmingly. The seventh was a satisfactory failure. I have fifteen more to try.4

Edison.

PL (transcript), Quad. 71.2, p. 12 (TAEM 10:228).Page 539

1. Edison identified Miller as the recipient. Quad. 70.7, pp. 264,337 (TAEM 9:499, 535).

2. Edison reported early in April that his tests were then finished, having occupied some twenty-two nights (Doc. 303). The tests had probably begun by the end of February (Docs. 284, 285, and 288). Thus Edison probably was at the stage indicated here around the middle of March.

3. The length of the test line was double the distance between New York City and Boston. Since all the experimental apparatus was in New York, the tests were made on a “loop” circuit, connecting two lines together at the Boston office so that both ends of the circuit were in New York.

4. See Doc. 286, n. 7; and Doc. 303.

  • Notebook Entry: Topic List for Book 1

[Newark, Winter 1873]2

Duplex.

Repeater

Fac similes

Dot & Dash Chemical “Autos”

Magnetic Autos

Telegraph Inductive & discharge Currents.

Printing Instruments.

Transmitters for d[itt]o.

Perforating Machines.

Relays

Sounders

Morse Recording insts Movements.

Applications of Magnetism

" " Electricity

Mechanical Electric Movements

Magneto Telegraphy

Induction Coil telegraphy

Contracts

Batteries.

Novel

Connections.

Manipulations Novel.

Electromagnetic Enginesa

Duplex.3 Stearns—get copies patents =

“ Farmer " " " Extension & Reissue.

“ Siemens & Halske = Kramer,4 get copy teleghr giving description =

Edisons as shown in telegrapher Mention farmers Clockwork Double Trans

“ Edisons Magneticald[itt]o sameprinciple & result Boston Experiments

Page 540Have Double transmitter Article in Dub, Schellen & Blavier DuMoncel Translated =5

Edisons No 1 as in telegraphr

Edisons No 2 Vibratory

Edisons No 3 Mechanical Equalizer

“ No 4 Shunt with Rev battery on single relay

Reverse Current one & increase & decrease other =

Double trans Chemical

Rheos in connection

and Condenser Applications by Stearns and other means such as a Condenser of a duble Coil. No Condenser but Extra Coil on relay to take induction also to shunt Duplex relay with water Resist ance =

AX, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 1176: recto, leaf preceding page 1 (TAEM 6:2). “End of page.

1. This is apparently a topic list for a book on telegraphic and related electrical matters which Edison was planning. See NS-74-002, Lab. (TAEM 7:42).

2. These notebook pages have been dated on the basis of their content and context.

3. What follows elaborates upon the subject of duplex telegraphy, the first topic in this list (see Cat. 297:103, Lab. [TAEM 5:855] for the beginning of a later discussion of the topic). For a similar elaboration on repeaters, see Cat. 1176:31 (TAEM 6:33).

4. Prescott 1877, 830-32.

5. Julius Dub, Die Anwendung des Elektromagnetisms, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Telegraphic , Heinrich Schellen, Der Elektromagnetische Telegraph; E. E. Blavier, Nouveau traité de télégraphie électrique; and Theodose Du Moncel, Traité théorique et practique de télégraphie électrique. Each was published in several editions.

  • Notebook Entry: Multiple Telegraphy

[Newark, Winter 18731]

Duplex.2 wound opposite3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 541Mem4 you cannot reverse a current through an electromagnet without opening it.5


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Principle =6


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Reversing a Battery without much mechanism a Morse key in a circuit


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

AX, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 1176:2 (TAEM 6:4).

1. The date given here was determined by the content and context of the entry. Cf. Doc. 293.

2. This entry begins as a further elaboration of the topic of duplex telegraphy for Edison’s projected book, as outlined in Doc. 293.

3. See Doc. 276, n. 4.Page 542

4. Edison was working on a problem here that had occupied him for some time. A solution to it was crucial for his invention of a practical quadruplex telegraph. See Docs. 275-79, 285, 286, 297, 300, and 315.

5. “Yes but you can make let it open if you fix your sounder right for ‘Quad’” follows in Edison’s hand in a different ink (probably written late in 1874).

6. Here Edison shifts from an exclusive concern with duplexes to exploring general designs for reversing currents.

  • Agreement with George Harrington and Jfosiah Reiff

[New York?,] March 31, 1873a

Whereas by a certain Contract and agreement bearing date the first day of October A.D. 1870, between Thomas A. Edison of the City of Newark, State of New Jersey on the one part, and George Harrington of the City of Washington, District of Columbia of the other part, wherein it was stipulated and agreed on the part of the said Edison, that for and in consideration of certain valuable considerations as therein set forth, he the said Edison should invent and develope for practical use a System of Automatic or Fast Telegraphy embracing Perforators and other instruments and devices necessary thereto, and thereafter change, modify, add to and otherwise improve said System, instruments, devices, and other matters and things connected therewith as his experience and ability as an Inventor and Electrian might suggest and allow, all of said inventions, devices, instruments and System being held as provided in and covered by said contract and agreement of October 1st A.D. 1870.

And whereas it is the desire of said Harrington that the said Edison shall, if practicable and possible, invent and develope a practical System of Fast Telegraphy, whereby intelligence or despatches may be transmitted at a rapid rate in such manner as to reproduce the intelligence or despatch so transmitted at the receiving office in Roman Characters or letters in such form and in such legible and permanent manner as will permit the delivery thereof directly to the general public or parties to whom addressed or for whom intended, without the necessity for translating, copying or transcribing as is now necessary before delivery, with the power to take drop copies at will and in Roman characters permanently imprinted at intermediate or way stations—1

And Whereas the said Edison is ready to undertake the discovery, invention and developement into practical use of a System producing the results as above set forth2 Now therefore it is hereby stipulated and agreed by said Edison, that hePage 543 the said Edison shall at once proceed to invent and discover a method whereby intelligence or despatches may be transmitted over the ordinary wires now in use for telegraph purposes at a speed of Five Hundred words per minute over ordinary circuits of Three hundred miles in length, and at a rate of speed not less than Eighty words per minute over circuits of One Thousand miles in length—the intelligence or despatches so transmitted to be received at any one or more offices within the circuit, in plain, clearly defined and permanent Roman characters or letters and equally and at the same time when so desired or required at the several intermediate stations or offices as “drop Copies” all, without the necessity for further manipulation in translating, transcribing or copying, ready for delivery to the parties to whom addressed or intended.

And the said Harrington on his part or the said Harrington and J. C. Reiff his associate, of the City of New York, State of New York, stipulate and agree to advance to said Edison from time to time the aggregate sum of Three hundred dollars and to further pay to the said Edison, immediately after the satisfactory accomplishment of his undertaking3 a further sum to a whole aggregate of Fifteen Thousand dollars, to cover the extra expenses and extra labors of said Edison in producing the System and results as above set forth; but the said sum of Fifteen Thousand dollars shall cover the cost of Three sets of instruments for terminal and way offices complete for immediate use.

And the said Edison further stipulates agrees and guaranties that the inventions, devices and System as above recited shall be practical, easily learned and manipulated, and shall be original, so as to be secured by Letters Patent in the United States and in all foreign countries, for which purpose the said Edison shall cause to be made the necessary models, drawings and descriptions when required so to do, and that all of said Patents shall be held and controlled in the manner and proportions and for the purposes as set forth in the contract and agreement first hereinbefore recited;4 the said Harrington on his part agreeing that any of the inventions and devices of said Edison covered by Patents now held by said Harrington may under the stipulations and for the exclusive purposes herein set forth, be utilized and used as a part of said System, until the same shall be in due form assigned as herein contemplated in accordance with the contract and agreement of October first A.D. 1870 hereinbefore recited.

Page 544And the said Edison further stipulates and agrees for himself his heirs and Executors that he or they shall and will truly make and execute any and all further papers necessary or requisite in the premises, as they may be required, to complete and confirm the right, title, interest and control of said Harrington in accordance with and in fulfilment of the stipulations and purposes of the parties hereto, as hereinbefore set forth, and as pointed out in the before recited contract of October 1st A.D. 1870.

It is further stipulated and agreed by and between the parties hereto, that if the said Edison shall fail in developing practically as herein set forth, a rate of speed of Five Hundred and not less than Eighty words over circuits of the lengths hereinbefore set forth, but shall succeed at a lesser rate of speed over circuits of Three Hundred miles, then and in that case, the compensation herein provided shall be reduced as the rate of transmission falls short of the speed above set forth of Five Hundred words for circuits of Three Hundred miles, and the payment shall be as follows: If the rate of speed for circuits of Three Hundred miles shall be, but not exceed Four Hundred words per minute the compensation shall be ($12000) Twelve Thousand dollars— If the rate of speed shall be, but not exceed Three hundred words per minute, the compensation shall beb ($10,000) Ten Thousand dollars— If the rate of speed shall be, but not exceed Two hundred words per minute the compensation shall be ($7,000.) Seven Thousand dollars. If the rate of speed shall be, but not exceed one hundred and fifty words per minute, then the compensation shall be ($5000.) Five Thousand dollars. But if the rate of speed shall not attain this latter recited speed of One hundred and fifty words per minute, then no compensation shall be claimed or allowed for extra services and labor—provided That for circuits of One Thousand miles, the minimum rate of speed shall not be less than Eighty words per minute.

It is further stipulated and agreed that the foregoing contract and agreement shall be held confidentially, that is to say, the proceedings of Edison and his purposes shall not be communicated to any one whatsoever and that neither the said Harrington, nor the said Reiff shall offer for sale the said inventions until all others now completed and in practical use are fully disposed of.

In Witness whereof the said Thomas A. Edison and said George Harrington and the said Associate of said Harrington J. C. Reiff have hereunto set their hands, and affixed their Page 545seals this Thirty First day of March Anno Domini eighteen hundred and seventy three.

Thomas Alva Edisonc

Geo Harringtonc
Josiah C Reiffc

In presence of David G. Barnitz Eugene H. Gibson.5

DS (copy), NjWOE, LS (TAEM 28:956). Written by David Barnitz. •Date taken from text, form altered. b“shall be” interlined above. bFollowed by representation of a seal.

1. Two major obstacles to the success of automatic telegraphy were the system’s inability to drop copies at intermediate stations and the time required to transcribe received messages. By fulfilling the agreement outlined here, Edison would overcome both difficulties.

2. Edison had been working on a roman-character system intermittendy since the summer of 1871. See Docs. 184, 186, and 194.

3. Edison did not succeed. He tackled the problems again in 1875 at the behest of Jay Gould.

4. Edison received U.S. Patents 151,209, 172,305, and 173,718 for roman-character telegraphs. He assigned all three jointly to Harrington and himself.

5. Unidentified.

  • To Norman Miller

[Newark or New York, March 1873]1

Mr Miller

You get me a Phelps Relay 125 Ohms & Phelps key I will fix rest”

AL (photographic transcript), NjWOE, Quad. 71.2, facing p. 14 (TAEM 10:229). a“Borrowed of W U Co. Apl 1/73 by NCM order of V. P. Mumford.” written in an unknown hand at lower right.

1. Miller left this note with Phelps at the Western Union shop when he borrowed the specified equipment on 1 April 1873, so Edison must have written and sent it sometime earlier, probably close to the end of March. (Testimony of George Phelps, Jr., Quad. 71.1, pp. 314-16 [TAEM 10:164]). The equipment apparently was never returned to Phelps’s shop.

  • MULTIPLE TELEGRAPHY DESIGNS Doc. 297

The devices and arrangements in Doc. 297 reveal aspects of Edison’s work on duplex and related telegraph designs during the months after he began testing some of his apparatus on Western Union’s lines and before selected designs were specified in patent application drawings and models. 1 In these Page 546drawings, Edison was refining or modifying some prior designs, such as the current-reversal mechanisms sketched late in 1872, while continuing to envisage and analyze additional possibilities, such as the last two drawings in Doc. 297. His considerations were related to his proposed book as well as to his inventive work for Western Union.2

1. The drawings appear on four consecutive pages of a notebook. The pages immediately before and after are devoted to different subjects. Related sets of duplex designs from this period (bounded by Docs. 275 and 315) not published in this edition include: Cat. 298:133(3), 134(1), Lab. (TAEM 5:261-62); Cat. 297:13(2), 135-40, 146(3), 152-53, Lab. (TAEM 5:489, 929-51, 968, 989-93); Cat. 30,099:277-90, Lab. (TAEM 5:1065-74); and Cat. 1176:41-43, 46-47, Lab. ( TAEM 6:43-45. 47-48).

2. This entry is in the notebook that began with plans for Edison’s projected book (Docs. 293-94). See also Doc. 303.

  • Notebook Entry: Multiple Telegraphy and Miscellaneous 1

[Newark, March 1873?2]

[A]3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[B]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[C]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[D]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[E]4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[F]5


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[G]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 547[H]6


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[I]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[J]7


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[K]8


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[L]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

AX, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 1176:36 (TAEM 6:38).

1. See headnote above.

2. The date has been estimated in light of the physical, stylistic, and topical relations among these pages and other materials from this period.

3. The designs here designated A, C, and D are related, the second being a simpler, and the third a more complex, modification of the first. Their purpose is not clear, nor is that of the device sketched in B. However, A, C, and D are clearly devices with sequential effects; one electromagnet causes another to act, and that one in turn affects the status of the first one.Page 548

4. Designs E and I are related to Doc. 278. Cf. also Cat. 1176:6, Lab. (TAEM 6:8); and U.S. Patent 150,846.

5. In regard to this and drawing G, see designs 10 and 14 in Doc. 285; Cat. 1176:42, 51, Lab. (TAEM 6:44, 52); and Doc. 311.

6. Cf. Docs. 275-77; design 16 in Doc. 285; and Docs. 294 and 315.

7. Cf. Doc. 279; “No 21 “ in Doc. 286; and drawing L of this document.

8. Regarding this and the last design, cf. Doc. 28; Cat. 298:48, Lab. (TAEM 5:97-98); Cat. 297:1(1), 4(6), 31(4-5). 34(2), 138(4). 139Ü). 140(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:427, 438, 551-52, 557, 942, 945,949); and Cat. 1176:5, 17, 41, Lab. (TAEM 6:7, 19, 43).

  • Technical Note: Automatic and Multiple Telegraphy 1

[Newark, March 1873?2]

Try this3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Duplex Static Current.4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

no g[u]es[s] not


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Try this5


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

AX, NjWOE, Lab., NS-Undated-005 (TAEM 8:331).Page 549

1. In these undated sketches dealing with both automatic and duplex telegraphy, Edison was trying to find superior ways to cope with the problems of static discharge and induction currents on telegraph lines, whether overhead wires or submarine cables. The last two sketches illustrate the use of condensers in duplex telegraphy, a technique introduced by Joseph Stearns; the first sketch illustrates the use of a condenser in a cable system, in which context they had been commonplace for many years (Doc. 283). Possibly earlier related designs are found in Cat. 297:26, 59, Lab. (TAEM 5:532, 638). The other two arrangements here involve coils inside coils, creating intensified inductive effects. Edison considered a multitude of such designs in combination with several of his other approaches (cf. Docs. 278, 279, 297, and 312; Cat. 297:78, Lab. [TAEM 5:743]; and Cat. 1176:47, Lab. [TAEM 6:48]). These experiments among other things led to the system described in Edison’s U.S. Pat. 147,311.

2. This date was determined through links in style and content with other materials.

3. This drawing is similar to the designs found in Docs. 299 and 317, in which Edison employed a condenser in his artificial line system for placing the receiving instrument of an automatic telegraph at a neutral point in order to overcome static discharge.

4. See n. 1 above; similar designs in NS-Undated-005 (TAEM 8:329-32, 412); Cat. 297:26(1), 34(3), 75(2), 80(1), 81(1), 146(3), Lab. (TAEM 5:532, 556, 726, 751, 757, 968); and the possibly later Cat. 297:81(1) verso, 81(5), 89(1), Lab. (TAEM 5:756, 762, 803). Cf. also U.S. Patents 178,222 and 180,858 in connection with the upper lefthand sketch, and for the sketch at the upper right, U.S. Patent 150,846 as well as the material cited in Doc. 297, n. 8.

5. See n. 1 above; and cf. “Duplex No. 1” and “Duplex No 2” in Doc. 285, and Doc. 314.

  • Notebook Entry: Automatic Telegraphy

[Newark, March 1873?]1

Cables

Edisons system of Cables working by Centers of resistances and static accumulation2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 550This system gives perfect work between NYork and Washington at 1600 words per minute3

Experiments to be tried to lessen The resistance of the artificial line—


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Still later 3180 words per minute areadable =

AX, NjWOE, Cat. 1176:45, Lab. (TAEM 6:46).

1. Edison executed his U.S. patent application on this method of working cables and long land lines on 23 April 1873 (Doc. 317). Earlier he had executed a British patent application on the same system, and it was filed on 25 April 1873 (Brit. Pat. 1,508).

2. In his patents for this system (n. 1), Edison claimed that he could neutralize the effects of the static charge on a line by placing the receiving instrument at “a point of no electric tension or zero, as regards the static charge.” He did this by balancing the line capacitance and the combined resistances of receiving instrument and line with resistance and capacitance on an artificial line at the receiving end (as shown in the first drawing). Adjustable condensers allowed the static charge of this artificial line to be increased or decreased in order to maintain a balance.

3. Edison probably tried this system on the New York-Washington line of the Automatic Telegraph Co.

  • MULTIPLE TELEGRAPHY CIRCUITS Doc. 300

In the unfinished circuit designs in Doc. 300 Edison sought an arrangement of devices that would increase and decrease current strength and reverse current direction. Such a design would permit diplex and quadruplex telegraphy, rather than just the duplex system.1 Drawing A is similar to the type of design with which Edison later achieved success in this field.2 However, the problem of current reversals breaking up the other signals was not dealt with here, and Edison knew that without a solution for that problem the system remained impractical.3 In sketches B and C he apparently considered alternative arrangements for the terminals, but their unfinished character leaves their intended operation unknown.

1. To analyze designs of this type, as well as others for diplex and quadruplex telegraphy working on different principles, cf. Docs. 275-78, 285-86, 294, 297,315, and the materials cited there.Page 551

2. Prescott 1877, 832-42.

3. Edison marked many other circuit designs “OK” or otherwise indicated they were satisfactory or worth further work, but those in this entry were neither so labeled nor even completed. Cf. Cat. 297:154(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:995); and Cat. 30,099:288, Lab. (TAEM 5:1066); see also Doc. 294.

  • Notebook Entry: Multiple Telegraphy 1

[Newark, March 1873?2]

[A]3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[B]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[C]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

AX, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 30,099:282 (TAEM 5:1069).

1. See headnote above.

2. The date has been estimated through the document’s physical relationship to other items in the notebook and the correspondence of its content and style to other documents of this period.

3. In this drawing, B is apparently a neutral (ordinary) relay. Immediately below B is a polarized relay. Each R is a resistance, probably adjustable, and each G is a ground connection.

  • Draft Caveat: Multiple Telegraphy 1

[Newark, March 1873?2]

Telegraphing.

The object of this invention is to transmit twoa despatches in toposite and the same direction over one wire at the same timeb

The invention consists in mthe maode of rendering nil the effect of the outgoing current upon the receiving magnet3

Fig .1.4 represents one devicec


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 2d


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

A is the relay B is the sounder E the key D a local battery R & K resistances J a neutralizing battery H the main battery When the Key E is worked the sounder works with it so when it is closed the Lever C is brought down thro Page 553putting the battery on the line ethrough the point G a portion of the current from the battery going to the ground through R ate the instant the [1]everf C closes on the point G the points N & F close and Shunt the throw an opposing Battery J on the relay, which in its effects is equal to the battery H. but in opposite character.g Consequently the effect is neutralized any variation between the two batters being Compensated for by adjusting the Rheostat .K. to make the effect of the battery J weak or strong.5

[Fig? 3?]h Showsi

ADf (fragment), NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 297:4, 3, 14 (TAEM 5:440, 434, 492). These pages were placed separately in a scrapbook at a later date, but since there are physical indications that they were fastened together earlier and they are linked in content, they are assembled here as parts of one document, some other parts of which are missing. “Interlined above. bLined through with orange pencil or crayon at a later time. ‘“Top” written in orange pencil or crayon at top right of the first drawing; the sketch to the right of “E” is in pencil; the main drawing and text are in blue ink. Two pages following the first drawing are missing. dThis drawing begins a page, with “4” written at top center. “Top” appears at top left and “No 7” at bottom right of the drawing, both in orange pencil or crayon. ‘This starts a new page, with “5” written at top center. Obverse has another, much less detailed and less finished sketch on it. See n. 3. ‘Initial letter obscure. g“but... character” interlined above. hAlmost entirely missing at torn edge of paper. ‘Lower edges of letters torn off; remainder of line and document completely lost.

1. This document is unlabeled but it has the phrasing and organizational character of a caveat rather than a patent application as it deals with quite different devices or arrangements.

2. This document clearly predates the drawing up of individual patent applications such as Docs. 304-5, 308-11, and 314-15. It is possible that this draft dates from one or two months earlier, about the time of Doc. 283.

3. This is the general point of duplex telegraphy. See headnote, pp. 31-32; and Docs. 28 and 285.

4. In this design, A is a spring contact fastened to the pivoted armature N. Pressing key D operates sounder 3 and sends a signal out on the line through magnet F by cutting in battery E, but the pressure on A prevents N from responding to the pull of F. Unopposed incoming signals charge F and attract N, thereby activating sounder 2. When incoming and outgoing signals are simultaneous, the combined current charges F sufficiently to overcome spring A, operating both sounders 2 and 3. Many related designs survive. See, for example, Cat. 297:1(1), 4(4), 15(1), 75(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:427,441,496, 726); and, in particular, Cat. 30,099:288, Lab. (TAEM 5:1066).

5. Cf. Doc. 285, designs 3 and 4; Doc. 314; Cat. 30,099:288, Lab. (TAEM 5:1066); Cat. 1176:41-43, Lab. (TAEM 6:43-45); and Cat. 297:154(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:995).

  • Draft to Munn & Co.

[Newark, March 1873?1]

Munn & Co2

Please mention in case no. 1. a slight alteration3 Thus.a


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

The compensating magnet .X. is split a local current constantly circulating in one helix, the other coil is inserted into an artificial line, the circuit of which is opposed to the local G.—

Alsob mention that an extra front point may be used instead of back point and when the main circuit was closed the local spe magnet would be cut off also that

AD (fragment), NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 297:30 (TAEM 5:550). Letterhead of the Gold and Stock Telegraph Co. ‘“Top”, written in orange pencil or crayon above the drawing, was probably added later. ‘Starting with this word, the text runs vertically along the right margin of the drawing.

1. The date of this entry has been estimated on the basis of several considerations. The note deals with the modification of a patent application that was being prepared by the patent solicitors. Doc. 303 indicates that this was in process by 4 April 1873, and Doc. 304 shows that it was done by 9 April 1873. The existence of early notes and draft stages of such applications means that a fair amount of time was involved in the preparation. See unsigned technical notes in 73-009, DF (TAEM 12:1187-97).

2. Munn & Co. was a patent agency Edison was dealing with at this time; it was also the publisher of Scientific American. See Docs. 303 and 316.

3. Presumably this is a reference to what became Doc. 304. But cf. “Duplex No 1” and “Duplex No 2” in Doc. 285; “No 18”, Doc. 286; Cat. 30,099:276, Lab. (TAEM 5:1074); and Cat. 297:88(4) verso, Lab. (TAEM 5:802).

  • To Norman Miller

[Newark?,] April 4, 1873.

Mr. Miller:

Please inform Mr. Orton that I have accomplished all I agreed to with one exception, and am now ready to exhibit and close the thing up.1

duplex.

I experimented twenty-two nights; tried twenty-three duplex systems; 2 nine were failures, four partial success, and ten were all right; one or two of the latter worked rather bad, but the principle is good, and if they were to be used could be improved in detail; eight were good, one of which requires no special instruments; a single wire run in a peculiar manner in a Morse set of instruments transforms them into a duplex. Ten models for ten different duplex have been delivered to Munn & Co., patent solicitors.3

“working played out wires.”

Several experiments made on Washington wires after heavy rain. With the ordinary relay the signals came hard; with attachment to ordinary relay the signals came strong, sharp and clear; two models of this have been delivered to L. M. Serrell, patent solicitor.4 One attachment is being made for exhibition. I will be ready in five days or sooner.

“working long circuits.”

Twenty-four hundred miles were worked by me at different times without repeater, but so far I do not think the devices I have are of any practical value. I shall not give it up. 5 The patents will be allowed in about three months. 6 In the meantime if I run across another duplex I will take steps to confine it in the Patent Office immediately, so that duplex shall be a patent intricacy, and the intricacy owned by the WU.7

Please ask Mr. Orton what I shall do next. Yours,

Edison.

P.S.—I have full records of all experiments to the minutest detail, with dates.81 also go back on duplex prior to Stearns’.9

PL (transcript), NjWOE, Quad. 71.2, p. 11 (TAEM 10:227).

1. The terms of Edison’s agreement with Orton, stemming from their February 1873 negotiations, later became one focus of the extensive litigation known as the Quadruplex Case (Quad. [TAEM, reels 9 and 10]). See also Docs. 284, 288, 292, and 316.

2. Cf. Docs. 285, 286, 292, and 316. What constituted a distinct system, as opposed to a mere variation within a system, is not clear.

3. Eight of these designs are found in Docs. 304-5, 308-11, and 314-15. No extant design fits Edison’s claim of making a duplex by running one wire a special way in an ordinary telegraph apparatus. The Page 556closest designs to this are Doc. 314, nos. 3 and 4 in Doc. 285, and especially “Fig. 2” in Doc. 301.

4. This is probably a reference to a design covered in U.S. Patent 150,846.

5. This is probably a reference to the design in U.S. Patent 147,311.

6. The earliest related patent was issued 10 February 1874 (U.S. Pat. 147,311), and many applications were never approved. See headnote below.

7. During this same period Edison applied for a patent on a duplex design using electrochemical telegraph receivers; he assigned it to Harrington and himself. He also applied for patents for at least two other duplex systems through Lemuel Serrell. See U.S. Pats. 156,843 and 147,917; and Doc. 316. On one drawing of related circuits Edison wrote “Duplex. =W.U.>‘ Cat. 297:135(3), Lab. (TAEM 5:930).

8. No such dated, detailed records remain; however, see Cat. 297:146(3), Lab. (TAEM 5:968).

9. This is probably a reference to Edison’s early experiments with duplex telegraphy, which predated Stearns’s introduction of duplex instruments on the lines of the Franklin Telegraph Co. Edison testified that he began such experiments in 1865. See, for example, Edison’s testimony, pp. 22-23, Nicholson v. Edison.

  • CASES A-H: PATENT APPLICATIONS FOR DUPLEX TELEGRAPHY SYSTEMS

    Docs. 304-305, 308-311, and 314-315

During the fourteen days preceding Edison’s April 1873 departure for England, he executed through Munn & Co. a series of eight patent applications for systems of duplex telegraphy.1 These applications came to be known as Cases A-H owing to the designations apparently assigned to them by Munn & Co. They constitute a further development of Edison’s ideas on duplex telegraphy derived both from his many tests on Western Union lines and from further thought about still other designs or variations. All are variations of earlier designs; some are elaborations or refinements, and others are major modifications.2 The last of this series—Case H (Doc. 315)—became the focus of much further work.

Edison signed these applications, but he later said they were poorly done and that he found them confusing and partly unintelligible.3 He had provided models and drawings of the designs, as well as some notes, drafts, and comments about them, but he left the actual wording of the applications to the firm of patent agents.4 All of these applications were initially rejected; only for Case H did Edison eventually receive a patent,Page 557 and that only after considerable amendment of the description.5

1. The first of these applications was executed on 9 April 1873, the last on 22 April 1873, and Edison left for England the next day. These systems were all strictly for duplexing, though the designs and tests leading to them had also involved diplex and quadruplex attempts. The original patent application file survives only for Case H; for the rest there are only typed copies (photographic copies of the drawings) of the files provided by the Patent Office to Edison in 1907 for use as evidence in a legal proceeding (see folder introduction, TAEM 8:548). Though these copies were certified to be “true,” some apparently contain errors of transcription. See also Docs. 302, 303, and 316 regarding the preparation and filing of the applications. During this period Edison executed several other patent applications that he filed through his regular patent agent, Lemuel Serrell. Some of those covered duplex designs as well (see Doc. 316).

2. Cf. Docs. 275-79, 283, 285-86, 294, and 297-302. Consider in particular the designs numbered 1-4,10-13, and 10-13, and 16 in Doc. 285.

3. Edison’s testimony, Quad. 70.7, p. 344 (TAEM 9:539).

4. Ibid.; Docs. 301-3; and unsigned technical notes, 73-009, DF (TAEM 12:1187-97).

5. Some designs, such as that described in Doc. 310, were fully or partly incorporated in later, separately filed, Edison patents. See also Doc. 316, n. 2.

  • Patent Application: Multiple Telegraphy 1

New York, April 9, 1873a

Specification—describing a new and Improved Duplex Telegraph Apparatus: invented by Thomas A. Edison of Newark, in the County of Essex, and State of New Jersey—

My invention relates to apparatus for simultaneous transmission of two dispatches or signals from opposite ends over the same line wire; and consists in combination with opposing relay and local magnets, of a device which by mechanical means, prevents the lever vibrating between said magnets from responding to the signals transmitted from the home station, but does not prevent the same from responding to the signals from the distant station—2

In the accompanying drawing,—

Figure 1, represents a plan view of my apparatus for double transmission and

Figure 2. a modification of the same, showing the arrangement of an opposing & local battery for neutralizing each other, whereby it is not necessary to break the circuit.

Similar letters of reference indicate corresponding parts,— Case Ab


            Page 558Fig: 1.
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Fig: 2.
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Inventor:c T. A. Edison Perc Munn & Co. Attorneys.c Witnesses:c Chas. Nida.3 [P.?]d Sedgwick4e

In the drawing A, is the receiving magnet. B. is an opposing magnet, operated by a local battery, L.B. placed in circuit with the sounder lever SL, by spring extension a, and contact b .

L. is the armature lever of the receiving magnet A, and local magnet B, pivoted so as to vibrate between them.

S, is its spring, the tension of which is greater than the power of each magnet singly, but of less tension than the combination of either magnet with the current of the line.—

SM is the sounder Magnet, operated by the sounder battery SB, and key R, 5 d, the contact stop connecting main battery MB, by sounder lever SL, and wire m, to the line wire, R, A6 rheostat, placed between relay A, and the earth—plate E, and transmitting part of the force of the main battery to the earth, sending the other part of the current to the distant station without overcoming the tension of spring S—

Page 559The local circuit is closed, when the home station is not transmitting, the local magnet being not strong enough to attract the lever L, on account of the resistance of spring S. If however the distant station is sending, the combined power of the line current and local current overcomes the resistance of the spring S. and the relay responds to the signals of the distant station.

When, however, the local circuit is opened, by the depression of key R, and attraction of the sounder lever SL, to its magnet, the sounder lever breaks contact with b, and closes the circuit with the main battery at contact d, the current passes through the relay A, to the line without moving the lever L, not being strong enough to overcome the resistance of spring S—Thus the signals of the home station are transmitted through the receiving magnet, which is always in circuit with the distant station, without responding to them—If however, a current be transmitted from the distant station simultaneously with the closing of the main circuit at the home station, the power of the electro magnet A, is increased, a greater power is exerted on the vibrating lever L, namely: the combination of the power of both main batteries and the resistance of the spring S, is overcome, so that lever I7 moves, transmitting the signals of the distant station:

The relay at the other end of the line responds in similar manner to the signals of the home station, transmitting thereby simultaneously the signals from either station at the same time.

By connecting the local battery LB, with an opposing battery OB, in the same circuit they will neutralize each other, but preserve at the same time the continuity of the circuit.—

The magnet B, discharges itself within its own circuit for the purpose of being rendered more sluggish, avoiding thereby the danger of attracting lever L, and creating a confusion of signals.—

Having thus described my invention—

I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent.

1st The armature lever L, placed between the receiving and local magnets A and B, having strong spring S, to be vibrated by the joint action of either with the line current, when singly they are too weak to change its position substantially as described.—

2d The sounder lever S,L, having spring extension a or equivalent, in combination with the contact stops b, d, to constitute a joint conductor for the current of the main or local battery, as described.—

Page 5603rd The combination of the receiving magnet A, with the main battery MB, sounder lever SL, and rheostat R, to regulate outgoing current of main battery and establishing earth circuit, substantially as and for the purpose described.—

Thomas. A. Edison

Witnesses: Paul Goepel.8 T. B. Mosher9

TD (transcript) and D (photographic transcript), NjWOE, PS, Abandoned Patent Applications (TAEM 8:552, 582). Petition and oath omitted. This copy of the original file (certified to be “true”), including the wrapper and related correspondence, then still in the U.S. Patent Office records, was provided to Edison in 1907 for use as evidence (see TAEM 8:548); the original no longer exists. aPlace and date taken from oath and petition. b“Case A” written in an unknown hand. ‘Preprinred. dPossibly “C.” cUnclear term or name follows in lower left comer, and “Rej Apl 30h 1873” is written in bottom margin, with “‘June sh’” under that; drawings and signatures are on a separate page.

1. See headnote above.

2. This is Case A; however, this initial characterization matches neither the rest of the description nor the drawings. Rather, it apparently relates to the first design shown in Doc. 301. For the design shown and described here, cf. “Duplex No 1” and “Duplex No 2” in Doc. 285 and the materials cited there; see also Doc. 302.

3. Unidentified.

4. Unidentified.

5. Should be “K.”

6. Not a label; should be “a.”

7. Should be “L.”

8. Unidentified.

9. Unidentified.

  • Patent Application: Multiple Telegraphy 1

New York, April 9, 1873a

Specificationb describing a new and Improved Duplex Telegraph Apparatus invented by Thomas A. Edison of Newark, in the County of Essex, and State of New Jersey.

My invention has for its object the simultaneous transmission of two signals over the same wire, but in opposite directions and consists of the combination of two relays with their armature lever, pivoted between them and placed at different distances from the same, so as to prevent the relays to respond to the signals transmitted from the home station without being prevented from receiving the signals of the distant station. 2

Page 561Case Bc

Inventor:d T. A. Edison Pef Munn & Co. Attorneys.d Witnesses:d Chas. Nida.3 [P.?]3 Sedgwick4f


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

The accompanying drawing represents a plan view of my improved apparatus for double transmission, in which A. and B. are the receiving magnets. L. their armature lever, pivoted between them and adjusted at greater distance from magnet A. than from magnet B. requiring therefor an increased amount of power to attract the same to A. instead to magnet B. The magnet B. is connected by wire m, with contact stop a, and by spring contact z, 5 to the earth. An insulated extension a’ , of contact, a, serves also as back stop for sounder lever SL. which acts, on closing to the sounder magnet S. on a second contact z’ of spring contact z, disconnecting the stops a b, and throwing relay B, out of circuit. Magnet A, is connected by wire m’ with the line and over the main batter M.B. to sounder lever S.L. operated by means of key k, sounder battery S.B. and magnet S.

By closing the sounder lever S.L. the same acts on contact z’ separating contacts a.z. and throwing magnet B. out of circuit. The current of the main battery MB. passes through magnet A. to the line. Magnet A. is placed at such a distance from lever L. that the power of the main batter M.B. is insufficient to attract the same, the signals are therefore transmitted to the distant station without being responded to by the home station. If however the sounder lever SL. be open, the Page 562main battery M.B. and magnet A, are thrown out of circuit and magnet B. being adjusted much closer to lever L. and placed by contacts a.z. in circuit, attracts lever L. and responds to the signals of the distant station. The line current is then conducted by contacts a.z to the earth B. 6 When both stations are transmitting, so that sounder lever S.L. is closed at each station, the combined strength of the main batteries both of the home and distant station is passed through magnet A. attracting the armature lever L. and responding thereby to the signals from the distant station.

Having thus described my invention—

I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent.

1st. The pivoted armature lever L. in construction7 with the magnets A. and B. adjusted between them as set forth and operated as described.

2d The sounder lever SL. in connection with spring contacts z.z’. and contacts a.a’. to throw either magnet A.B out ol circuit, substantially as set forth.

Thomas A. Edison

Witnesses: Paul Goepel8 T. B. Mosher9

TD (transcript) and D (photographic transcript), NjWOE, PS, Abandoned Patent Applications (TAEM 8:586, 603). See textnote for Doc 304. ‘Place and date taken from oath and petition. b“Case ‘B’” written in upper right margin. ‘“Case B” written in an unknown hand dPreprinted. ePossibly “C.” Unclear term or name follows in lower left corner, and “Rej Apl 30h 73” is written in bottom margin; drawing and signatures are on a separate sheet.

1. See headnote, p. 556.

2. This is case B. Cf. “Duplex No 1” and “Duplex No 2” in Doc 285 and material cited there.

3. Unidentified.

4. Unidentified.

5. Throughout the document “z” and “z′” should be “ b” and “b′

6. Should be “E.”

7. Probably means “connection.”

8. Unidentified.

9. Unidentified.

  • DUPLEX DESIGNS WITH ADJUSTABLE RESISTANCE COILS Docs. 306 and 307

Edison drew several closely related duplex designs that employed adjustable resistance coils to make a relay insensitive to outgoing signals but responsive to incoming ones, which was the fundamental goal of a duplex circuit.1 Edison applied for a patent on such an adjustable relay at the same time that he was applying for many duplex patents in April 1873; the relay patent was granted as U.S. Patent 160,405. He also appears to have used a similar design in his work on automatic telegraphy (see Docs. 324 and 336).Page 563

Right: Drawing from Edison’s patent of a relay with a shunt containing a set of coils for varying resistance (U.S. Pat. 160,405).


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Above: Sketch of a relay shunted by adjustable resistance coils (i.e., a rheostat) for use in one of Edison’s duplex telegraph designs, comparable to Docs. 306 and 307.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

1. Edison drew these designs on the back of Western Union forms and other scraps of paper. Cf. the accompanying sketch; Cat. 297:31(2), 33(1, 3,5). 34(1) recto and verso, Lab. (TAEM 5:551 ,554-55- 557-58); and Doc. 285, designs 3 and 4. Similarities of style, ink, and paper, combined with considerations of content and context, indicate that these designs all date from about the middle of April 1873.

  • Technical Drawing: Multiple Telegraphy 1

[Newark or New York, c. April 15, 1873]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 564AX, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 297:33 (TAEM 5:555). “Top” added at top of drawing in another hand.

1. See headnote above.

  • Technical Drawing: Multiple Telegraphy 1

[Newark or New York, c. April 15, 18732 ]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

AX, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 297:33 (TAEM 5:554).

1. See headnote, pp. 562-63.

2. This sketch is drawn on the back of a Western Union New York office form that is dated 15 April 1873.

  • Patent Application: Multiple Telegraphy 1

New York, April 16, 1873a

Specificationb describing a new and Improved Duplex Telegraph Apparatus invented by Thomas A. Edison of Newark in the County of Essex and State of New Jersey.

This invention relates to apparatus for simultaneous transmission of two dispatches or signals over the same line wire in opposite directions and consists in the neutralizing of the effect of the out going current on the receiving instrument by an adjustable opposing magnet, operated by a local battery so that the relay is prevented from responding to the signals of the home station. It also consists in the arrangement of an induction magnet in connection with the local battery and the main line, for neutralizing the static current of the line.2 In the accompanying drawing

Figure 1—represents a plan view of my improved apparatus for double transmission, and

Figure 2—is a side elevation partly in section, of the relay and the opposing local magnet.

Similar letters of reference indicate corresponding parts.

Page 565Case Dc

Fig. 1.
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Fig. 2.
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Inventor:d T. A. Edison Perd Munn & Co. Attorneys.d Witnesses:d Chas. Nida.3 [P.?]e Sedgwick4f

A represents the receiving magnet, the cores a of which are provided with projecting pieces a’ placed sideways of the axis of the cores towards each other, requiring a smaller armature, of lever L. The local magnet B having projecting cores b, is placed against the magnet A, with opposing poles, the N and S poles of the local magnet respectively. The lever L, with its armature is working between the forward projecting cores of the magnet B. The local magnet B is connected by guide rods d and d’ with pillar e and made adjustable towards magnet A by means of spiral spring f and thumb screw g. The magnet B may thereby be adjusted so as to exactly neutralize the effect of the out going current of the main battery on lever L. The local magnet B is operated by the local battery L.B. placed by Page 566contact h in connection with spring contact h’ of sounder lever SL which is again operated in the usual manner by sounder battery LB, Key K and magnet S. The local battery may be dispensed with and a secondary current sent from the main battery be made in the usual manner. The main battery connects by wire m to the relay A and the line and by wire n to the sounder lever which is placed by contact stop i through rheostat R in a shunt circuit with the carbon poles of the main and neutralizing batteries MB and MB’, the latter being connected to the earth E. C is an induction magnet, having one coil D in the same local circuit, the other coil F in circuit with the main line.

On operating the apparatus, the out going current of the main battery MB, on closing sounder lever SL, is divided, one portion passing through relay A to the line, the other through contacts i and rheostat R to battery MB and the earth. Rheostat R is of slight resistance, to prevent too much spark on contact, point i. The local circuit is connected at the same time by contacts h h’ and thereby the effect of the outgoing current upon the cores a, of the relay neutralized by the opposite polarities of the cores b of the local magnet B. The current passes therefore to the distant station, without effecting the lever L, as the sounder lever closes the local circuit, at the moment the main battery is thrown on the line.

When the sounder lever SL is open the armature lever L responds to the current of the distant station, as no opposing polarity of the local magnet prevents its attraction.

When the sounder levers are closed at both stations, the current of the main battery at the home station is neutralized by the local magnet, but the current of the distant station, being of equal polarity with it, attracts the lever L and responds thereby to the signals of the distant station.

The static current of the line is neutralized at the moment of closing and opening the sounder lever SL. When the sounder lever is closed the induction coil D of the local battery is acting upon the iron core C, which induces a momentary current into F and upon the line opposite to and of equal duration with the static current thereby neutralizing each other. At the moment of opening the sounder lever, the static current is at opposite polarity and is then neutralized by the induction current of coil F, which is also in opposite direction. The amount of induction electricity can be regulated by means of a rheostat shunt around the magnet D.

Page 567Having thus described my Invention—what I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent is

First—In apparatus for double transmission, the receiving instrument A, having inside projecting cores a in combination with the opposing magnet B having projecting cores b, adjustable towards the former and operated substantially as for the purpose described.

Second—The induction magnet C, having coils D and F placed in the local battery LB and the main line, to neutralize the static current on the same, substantially as and for the purpose described.

Thomas A Edison

Witnesses Paul Goepel.5 Alex F Roberts6

TD (transcript) and D (photographic transcript), NjWOE, PS, Abandoned Patent Applications (TAEM 8:634, 656). See textnote for Doc. 304. ‘Place and date taken from oath and petition.b“—Case D—” written at top center. ‘“Case D” written in an unknown hand. dPreprinted. ‘Possibly “C.” ‘Unclear term or name follows in lower left corner, and “Rej Apl 30h 73.” is written in bottom margin; drawing and signatures are on a separate sheet.

1. See headnote, p. 556.

2. This is Case D. Cf. Docs. 285 and 312, and U.S. Pat. 180,858. Cf. also Stearns’s patent of 18 March 1873 (U.S. Pat. 136,873), which used electromagnets instead of condensers to compensate for the “kick.”

3. Unidentified.

4. Unidentified.

5. Unidentified.

6. Unidentified.

  • Patent Application: Multiple Telegraphy 1

New York, April 16, 1873a

Specificationb—describing a new and Improved Duplex Telegraph Apparatus: invented by Thomas A. Edison of Newark, in the County of Essex, and State of New Jersey.—

My invention relates to apparatus for transmitting dispatches or signals simultaneously over the same line wire in opposite directions and consists of the neutralization of the effect of the out going current by the main batteries themselves, which are connected with same poles to both sides of the relay, the other poles being connected to the sounder lever and thence to the earth.2

Page 568Case Ec

Inventor:d T. A. Edison Perd Munn & Co. Attorneys.d Witnesses:d Chas. Nida3 [P.?]c Sedgwick4f


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

The accompanying drawing represents a plan view of my improved apparatus for double transmission in which

A, represents the receiving instrument or relay, L, its armature lever and M,B, two main batteries of equal strength, arranged at both sides of the relay in such a manner that the zink pole of one main battery is connected to one side of the relay, and the zink pole of the other main battery to the other side of the same. The carbon poles of both main batteries M,B, are connected to the sounder lever SL, which is operated in the usual manner, by its key K, sounder battery S,B, and magnet S, Both zink poles of the main batteries are connected to the relay A, through rheostats R, and R’5 adjusted with slight resistance to prevent shunting or short circuiting of the relay A. A third rheostat R 2, is placed between the relay A, and the earth plate E—The contact stop a, of the sounder lever SL, is also connected with the earth.

On closing the sounder lever S,L by the depression of key K, the carbon current is rounded through contact a, to the earth, the zink currents of both main batteries, pass through the relay A, to the line, but acting against each other, neutralizePage 569 their effect on the relay A. The circuit with the main battery at the distant station is thereby closed, and the signals are transmitted over the line, without affecting the armature of the relay. When the sounder lever is open, the signals from the distant station pass through the relay A, and the rheostat R2, to the earth. The lever L, responds to them as the two main batteries being in a shunt around the relay and opposing each other, produce no effect on the same.—

When, however, both sounder levers are simultaneously closed at the home and distant station, the relay R, 6 responds in similar manner to the current from the distant station, and the relay of the distant station to the outgoing zink current of the home batteries so that thereby two signals are transmitted at the same time, one from either station.—

Having thus described my invention.

I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent—

1st The receiving relay, in duplex telegraph apparatus, combined with the same poles of two main batteries, to neutralize effect of outgoing current on the relay, substantially as set forth.—

2nd The rheostats RR’, placed within the circuits of the opposing main batteries for the purpose described.—

Thomas A. Edison

Witnesses Paul Goepel.7 Alex E Roberts8

TD (transcript) and D (photographic transcript), NjWOE, PS, Abandoned Patent Applications (TAEM 8:660, 677). See textnote for Doc. 304. ‘Place and date taken from oath and petition. b“Case ‘E’” written at top center. c“Case E” written in an unknown hand; the drawing was later written over in pencil, probably at the U.S. Patent Office. dPreprinted. ePossibly “C.” fUnclear name or term follows in lower left corner, and “ Letter May 2d 1873.” is written in bottom margin; drawing and signatures are on a separate sheet.

1. See headnote, p. 556.

2. This invention is closely related to “Duplex No 13” in Doc. 285. The design is essentially a form of bridge duplex, though neither Edison nor the patent examiner gave any indication of recognizing that. Since bridge duplexes were an old form, the general mode of operation of this one should have been readily apparent and only its particular variations could be patented. The character of the circuit can be seen through comparison of the drawing in the document with the diagram shown here and with the illustration of a bridge duplex on page 530. All the components and connections shown in the drawing in the document are reproduced and similarly labeled in the diagram, but some have been partially rotated to enhance clarity. To facilitate comparisons the two wires connecting to the ground or earth (at E in the document) are shown separately in the diagram. Comparison of this diagram with the Wheatstone bridge shows the close similarity of their general designs. The main differences are Edison’s use of a local sounder circuit ( K, SB, S, SL, and a in the diagram) instead of just a key to send the signals, and his use of two equal batteries in the branches of the main circuit instead of a single larger battery located between the earth and the divergence of the branches (i.e., between Earth and a in the diagram). Joseph Stearns had been granted a patent (U.S. Pat. 132,932) on another form of bridge duplex on 12 November 1872 during the period when Edison renewed his efforts in this field. The present application (Case E) was rejected on 2 May 1873 and again, after an amendment prepared by Munn. & Co. had been submitted, on 7 June 1873, without reference to its generic character as a bridge duplex design. Commissioner of Patents to TAE, PS ( TAEM 8:665, 671).


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Page 570

3. Unidentified.

4. Unidentified.

5. Probably means “R1.”

6. Should be “A.”

7. Unidentified.

8. Unidentified.

  • Patent Application: Multiple Telegraphy 1

New York, April 16, 1873a

Specificationb describing a new and Improved Duplex Telegraph Apparatus invented by Thomas A. Edison, of Newark, in the County of Essex and State of New Jersey.

This invention relates to apparatus for the simultaneous transmission of two dispatches or signals from opposite ends over the same line wire and consists in the working of the receiving instrument by induction currents, generated in a secondary helix by the incoming current, when the outgoing current is neutralized by helices wound in opposite directions on the same magnet, so that the receiving instrument responds to the signals of the distant station without responding to the signals of the home station.— By means of an electro magnet placed between the battery and the induction coils the effect of the discharge of a static current is neutralized by the charge and discharge upon its iron core.2 In the accompanying drawing—

Figure 1. represents a plan view of my improved apparatus for duplex transmission worked by induction currents and

Figure 2. a detail side elevation of the secondary helix placed at right angles to the primary coils.3

Similar letters of reference indicate corresponding partsPage 571

Case Fc

Fig: 1.
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Fig: 2.
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Inventor:d T. A. Edison Perd Munn & Co. Attorneys.d Witnesses:d Chas. Nida.” [P.?]’ Sedgwick5 f

A, in the drawing represents the receiving instrument, being a polarized relay or other electro-magnet of the usual form. It is connected by wires m. with the secondary helix H, supported by a standard a and placed in a plane, vertical to the axis of the magnet B. Two coils I, and I’ are wound upon the magnet B in opposite directions, helix I connecting with the line and the battery MB, helix I’ with the battery M,B, and a rheostat R to the earth E.— These helices may also be wound in opposite directions in one coil instead of being separated. The secondary helix H embraces vertically the helix I, the core B of which is supported by standards a’.— C is an electro-magnet placed between battery M,B, and the magnet B and connected by wire n to contact stop b of the sounder lever S,L, which is again connected to the zinc poles of the two opposing batteries M,B and M,B’ and the latter with the earth plate E′.

The sounder lever S,L, is operated in the usual manner by sounder battery L,B, Key R and sounder magnet S.

The working of this apparatus for double transmission is based on the principle of galvanic induction, according to which by each closing and opening of the battery momentaryPage 572 induction currents of opposite directions are produced. When therefore, a current from the distant station passes over the main line into helix I of core B, a momentary current in opposite direction to the same is induced in helix H, which throws the lever or tongue L of the polarized relay A over to one side.—

When the battery at the distant station is disconnected, the induction current in the secondary helix, though of equal direction with it, is in opposite direction to the first induction current and throws therefore tongue L back to its former place. The relay A responds in this manner to the signals from the distant station by the opposite induction currents of helix H.

On transmitting signals from the home station to the distant station, the current divides, before entering into coils I and I’.— They being wound in opposite directions on magnet B, exercise no influence upon it and induce consequently no currents in the secondary helix H. One part of the main current passes therefore to the distant station, the other part through rheostat R to the earth. The outgoing current exercises no effect on relay A, the relay at the distant station responding to the same.—

When both stations are transmitting at the same time, the current from the distant station produces induction currents in the secondary helix H so that the relay A responds to the signals of the distant station. The outgoing current being neutralized in the manner described, operating the relay at the distant station.— The conditions of double transmission are therefore fulfilled and the respective relays responding simultaneaously to the currents from the other stations.—

The object of the electro magnet C is to neutralize the static current and to prevent a spark at contact b. The magnet C could also be placed on the compensating circuit, but would not be so effective.—

The disturbing effects of a discharge of a steady current on the magnet B and its helices I, amd I’ are neutralized by the charge and discharge of the current upon its iron core.—

Having thus described my invention, what I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent is

First. In apparatus for double transmission, a polarized relay A, placed in a secondary circuit to be worked by induction currents, generated by primary and secondary helices I, and H, as described.

Second.— The secondary helix H in connection with magnetPage 573 B, having opposite helices I and I’ to neutralize effect of outgoing current, substantially as described.—

Third.— The electro magnet C, arranged as set forth, to destroy the static discharge, as described.—

Thomas A Edison

Witnesses Paul Goepel6 Frank Blockley7

TD (transcript) and D (photographic transcript), NjWOE, PS, Abandoned Patent Applications (TAEM 8:681, 708). See textnote for Doc. 304. ‘Place and date taken from oath and petition.b“—Case F—” written at top center. ‘“Case F” written in an unknown hand; the drawing was later written over in pencil in two places, probably by U.S. Patent Office personnel. dPreprinted. ‘Possibly “C.” Unclear name or term follows in lower left corner, and “Rej May 2d 73” is written in bottom margin; drawing and signatures are on a separate sheet.

1. See headnote, p. 556.

2. This is Case F. The design is closely based on “Duplex No 12” in Doc. 285; it is also very similar to that of U.S. Patent 178,221, where the general operation is described far more clearly than is the case here. The idea involved is to combine the general pattern of a differential duplex with an induction coil (see Doc. 30, n. 2). The basic arrangement here is that of a differential duplex, but rather than having an armature affected by the two opposing primary coils (I and I’), a concentric secondary coil (H) is affected by the two primary coils through electromagnetic induction. That secondary coil would in turn operate a polarized relay. This may well be related to some of Edison’s very early inventive efforts. Cf. Docs. 30, 47, and 49.

3. The drawings show that the coils are concentric rather than at right angles to each other (cf. Doc. 311). The labels of the upper batteries at the left of the drawing do not match the following description; probably the upper one should be MB and the lower one MB’.

4. Unidentified.

5. Unidentified.

6. Unidentified.

7. Unidentified.

  • Patent Application: Multiple Telegraphy 1

New York, April 16, 1873a

Specificationd describing a new and Improved Duplex Telegraph Apparatus by Thomas A. Edison, of Newark, in the County of Essex, and State of New Jersey.

This invention relates to apparatus for simultaneous transmission of dispatches or signals over the same line wire in opposite directions and consists in encircling the armature of the receiving instrument by a double coil and sending an equal current in opposite direction to the outgoing current through the same, so that the effect of this current is rendered nugatory on the receiving instrument. It consists further in placingPage 574 an electro-magnet in the circuit of the main battery, for generating induction currents, and neutralizing the effect of the static current on the receiving instrument. By spring connection of the sounder lever, the main battery is inserted on closing, and the continuity of the circuit preserved, on opening the same.2

In the accompanying drawing.—

Figure 1, represents a plan view of my apparatus for double transmission, and—

Figure 2, a detail side elevation of the receiving instrument with the double helix, encircling its armature.

Similar letters of reference indicate corresponding parts

Case Gc

Fig: 1.
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Fig: 2.
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Inventor:d T. A. Edison Perd Munn & Co. Attorneys.d Witnesses:d Chas. Nida.3 [P.?]e Sedgwick4f

A, in the drawing is the receiving relay, L its armature lever. B the double helix encircling horizontally the armature above and below the lever L and between the extended cores a, of Page 575the relay A. A vertical standard b, supports the helix B.

The current of the main battery is divided, passing equally but in opposite directions through relay, A and helix B. A regulating rheostat R connects the helix B to the earth at E. A third circuit branches off by wire m, from the main current and passes through the coils of the magnets C and C to the earth. M,B, is the main battery connecting with both poles to a wedge shaped double contact d , e, of sounder lever S,L. Contacts d, and e, are insulated from each other, but act, on closing the sounder lever to its magnet S, respectively on two spring contacts f, g, also of wedge shape, which are supported by standard h,. When the sounder lever S,L is open, the edges of spring contacts f, g, touch each other, and being connected to the earth at E′, preserve the continuity of the circuit. The wedge contacts d, e, by separating contacts f, g, insert thereby main battery M,B, into the circuits.

Wire m′ conducts the current of the main battery from spring contact f , to the relay A, helix B and magnets C, C’, on the closing of sounder lever S,L. The latter is operated in the usual manner by sounder battery S,B, key R and magnet S.

When the distant station is sending, the armature of the receiving relay A, responds to the signals, the current passing over wire m’ and spring contacts f, g, to the earth. When however the home station is transmitting the sounder lever S,L, separates by its wedge contacts d, e., the spring contacts f, g, throwing thereby the main battery M,B, into the circuit. The current passes equally through the relay A to the line, and through helix B, in opposite direction to the earth, preventing the action of the armature, by balancing the magnetic current of relay A. The relay at the distant station responds therefore to the signals of the home station, the effect of the outgoing current on the relay of home station being neutralized. By placing the coil B in this manner around the armature the generation of induction currents may be prevented in the relay itself, when one helix is enclosed within the other.

When both stations are transmitting at the same time, relay A responds to the signals of the distant station, as the outgoing current is neutralized in the manner described. The relay of the distant station responds to the signals of the home station, transmitting the dispatches simultaneously over the line.

The magnets C, C’, form a third circuit of the main battery M,B, and generate by their charge and discharge induction currents equal to the static currents of the line.

These induction currents act on the double helix B in opposite directions as the static currents on the relay A, and neutralizePage 576 therefore their effect on the same. The regularity of the working of the relay and helix are thereby secured and confusion of signals effectively prevented.

Having thus described my invention.

What I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent, is—

First. The armature of the receiving instrument A encircled by double helix B, placed between the extended cores a, of the relay A, substantially as set forth.

Second.— The sounder lever S,L, having insulated wedge contacts d, e , in combination with spring contacts e, f to insert main battery and preserve continuity of circuit, substantially as described.

Third. The induction coil or magnets placed within, a compensating circuit for neutralizing the effect of the static current, substantially as shown and described, and for the purpose set forth.

Thomas A Edison

Witnesses Paul Goepel.5 Alex F. Roberts6

TD (transcript) and D (photographic transcript), NjWOE, PS, Abandoned Patent Applications (TAEM 8:712, 737). See textnote for Doc. 304. ‘Place and date taken from oath and petition. b“Case G” written at top center. c“Case G” written in an unknown hand. dPreprinted. ‘Possibly “C.” “Unclear term or name follows in lower left corner, and “Rej May 3d 1873.” is written in bottom margin; drawing and signatures are on a separate sheet.

1. See headnote, p. 556.

2. This is Case G. The design is based on “Duplex No 10” in Doc. 285 and on Doc. 297; cf. the materials cited in connection with those documents.

3. Unidentified.

4. Unidentified.

5. Unidentified.

6. Unidentified.

  • Notebook Entry: Multiple Telegraphy

[Newark,] April 17 18731

[A]2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[B]3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Page 577[C]4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[D]5


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[E]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

[F]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Duplex Same direction7

Edison6

[G]


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

AXS, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 1176:52 (TAEM 6:53).

1. This date, with signature, labels design F; drawings A through E could date from somewhat earlier. However, all the drawings here sharePage 578 a common ink, style, and topic; the preceding page is on a different (related) topic and is so headed; and the following page is blank. Thus the date probably applies to all the designs.

2. This is a variation on the design in Doc. 308 (“Case D”) and is related as well to designs 9 and 11 in Doc. 285 and to U.S. Patent 130,795. See also Cat. 297:15(4), 16(4), 59(2), 86(3), Lab. (TAEM 5:498, 505, 638, 789).

3. This is clearly related to the design in Doc. 309.

4. This is very similar to the basic (pre-1872) differential duplex design of Frischen and Siemens-Halske. However, as drawn, this will not work as a duplex because each time the key is opened it breaks up any incoming signal. Some additional ground connection is needed.

5. Cf. Cat. 297:3(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:433); and see n. 2 above.

6. Though not immediately apparent, this design and the preceding drawing are closely related to “Duplex No 6.” in Doc. 285. A more direct indication of their operation can be found through comparison with Edison’s U.S. Patent 178,222. Similar sketches can be found in “No 9” in Cat. 298:134(1), Lab. (TAEM 5:262); Cat. 297:2(4), 13(2), 16(3), 57(2), 59(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:430, 489, 503, 633, 638); and Cat. 30,099:284, Lab. (TAEM 5:1068).

7. The incomplete nature of this drawing makes it uncertain how this mechanism is to work, but the label indicates that this is a diplex design. See also Cat. 297:18(2,4,5), Lab. (TAEM 5:511-12); Cat. 1176:55, Lab. (TAEM 6:55); designs 8 and 14 in Doc. 285; “No 22” in Doc. 286; drawing L in Doc. 297; and Doc. 300.

  • To Marshall Lefferts

[Newark,] April 21, 1873

General

Mr Bergman1 was contracted with2 to build a Universal Model for 125 This model will be finished and delivered to you probably by Wednesday P.M. I put the price low and out by peice work so as to prevent shirking work Bergman has altered this model several times at my suggestion some of the alterations were very sweeping, and were made on account of a doubt

If he only receives 125 he will have lost money and as he has worked concientiously and hard I think that 200 is but fair and at that it is a very cheap model which on the old plan of day work would cost double I think you will find that This machine is about perfect It is very convenient.

The results are quick with the machinery working slow I can do no better I consider it the private line machine and my experience covers over 63 different printing telegraphs of my own and a constant work of 5 years 17 hours a day = in a diversity of mechanisms as complicated as 40 bushels of spiders webs

Page 579I believe it would be to the interest of the Co3 to give the order to me to build more than 100, but I do not know if it would be to my interest Yours Resp.

T A Edison

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 12:1110).

1. Sigmund Bergmann (1851-1927), born in Thuringia (later incorporated as part of Germany), came to the United States as a trained machinist in 1869 and joined Edison’s Ward St., Newark, shop in 1870. Bergmann possessed unusual mechanical skill and quickly assumed an important role as an Edison associate. He was also a keen businessman and in 1876 established his own shop in New York City. There he manufactured Edison’s phonographs, telephone equipment, and other inventions, expanding his quarters steadily. When Edison’s electric light work succeeded, Bergmann became the principal manufacturer of accessories for the system. He left the United States in the mid-1890s to devote himself to manufacturing electrical equipment in Germany. The Bergmann Electrical Works, one of Germany’s largest, later merged with the Siemens interests. Pioneers Bio.; Mew York Times, 8 July 1927, 19; “Sigmund Bergmann Dies,” Elec. W. 90 (1927): 80.

2. Payroll records indicate that Bergmann did not work at Edison’s shop from the fall of 1872 until the end of June 1873. Murray’s letter of 12 June 1873 (Doc. 338) suggests that Bergmann was working at Henry Thau’s shop in New York City. Bergmann and Thau became partners for a brief period in late 1874 or early 1875. PN-72-08-16, Accts. (TAEM 22:219-78); Cat. 1218:204, Accts. (TAEM 21:285); Thau’s testimony, pp. 61-63, Wiley v. Field.

3. The Gold and Stock Telegraph Co.; see Doc. 287.

  • Patent Application: Multiple Telegraphy 1

New York, April 22, 1873a

Specificationd describing a new and improved “Duplex Telegraph Apps” invented by Thomas A Edison of Newark, in the County of Essex and State of New Jersey

This invention relates to apparatus for simultaneous transmission of two dispatches or signals from opposite ends over the same line wire and consists in placing a shunt circuit around the relay, which in connection with an equating battery and adjustable rheostat neutralizes the effect of the main battery on the receiving instrument, preventing it thereby, to respond to the signals transmitted from the home station without preventing it to respond to the signals from the distant station.— 2

Page 580Case Cc

Inventor:d T. A. Edison Perd Munn & Co. Attorneys.d Witnesses:d Chas. Nida.3 [P.?]e Sedgwick4f


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

The accompanying drawing represents a plan view of my improved apparatus for double transmission in which, A is the receiving relay L its armature lever, M,B , and MB’ two main batteries of equal strength, but with opposing poles, the latter being connected to the earth at E. The equating Battery E,B , is placed in a shunt around the relay A with its current in opposite direction to that of the main battery MB, neutralizing thereby the effect of the same in relay A at the same moment, when the battery MB is put on the line. The resistance of the shunt and the consequent increase and decrease of the equating battery EB is obtained by the adjustable Rheostat R, placed between the battery EB and the relay A. The other pole of the equating battery EB is connected to the spring contact a of sounder lever SL, which is operated in the usual manner in duplex instruments by sounder battery SB, key R and sounder magnet S. The sounder lever SL is placed by means of wires m m′ and contact stop d in circuit with the opposing battery MB’, its insulated spring contact a, connecting the shunt circuit over contact stop b and wire n.

When the home station is not sending, so that the sounding lever is open, the line current passes through the relay, attracting lever L and thence to the earth at E. When however the sounder lever SL is closed, three different circuits are formedPage 581 by spring contacts a, b , and contact d, viz: the circuit of the opposing main battery M,B’, over wire M, sounder lever SL , contact d and wire m, the shunt circuit through rheostat R and relay A and the main circuit from battery M,B, through relay A and line to the distant station. In the circuit of the main battery MB’ a slight resistance may be thrown in to prevent spark at contact d. The outgoing main current is rendered nugatory in its effect on the relay, by the neutralizing influence of the opposing current of the shunt battery. One part of the main current passes around the relay over the shunt to the line, and transmits thereby the signals to the distant station, the relay A being prevented to respond to them.

When, however, both stations are transmitting signals at the same time, the current from the distant station operates the relay A, the outgoing current, being neutralized in its effect thereon, working in similar manner the receiving instrument at the distant station.

Having thus described my invention

I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent

First, In apparatus for double transmission, the combination of the receiving instrument with a shunt circuit and equating battery, to neutralize effect of outgoing current substantially as described.

Second, the sounder lever SL having spring contact a in connection with contacts d and b, to close circuit of opposing main battery MB’ and shunt circuit, substantially as and for the purpose described

Thomas A. Edison

Witnesses T. B. Mosher5 Alex F. Roberts6

TD (transcript) and D (photographic transcript), NjWOE, PS, Abandoned Patent Applications (TAEM 8:607, 630). See textnote for Doc. 304. aPlace and date taken from oath and petition. b“Case. C.” written at top center. ‘“Case C” written in an unknown hand; the drawing was later written over in pencil, probably at the U.S. Patent Office. dPreprinted. ePossibly “C.” ‘Unclear term or name follows in lower left corner, and “Rej Apl 30h 73” is written in bottom margin; drawing and signatures are on a separate sheet.

1. See headnote, p. 556.

2. This is Case C. The design is closely related to “Duplex No 3.” and “Duplex No 4.” in Doc. 285 and to the materials cited there; see also U.S. Patent 156,843.

3. Unidentified.

4. Unidentified.

5. Unidentified.

6. Unidentified.

  • Patent Application: Multiple Telegraphy 1

New York, April 22, 1873a

Specificationb describing a new and useful improvement in Duplex Telegraph App’s—invented by Thomas. A. Edison of the City of Newark in the County of Essex and State of New Jersey.

The invention has for its object the simultaneous transmission of two dispatches or signals over the same line wire from opposite directions and consists in working the relays at the distant stations by means of reversals of the current at the home station, while transmitting the signals from the distant station by the increase and decrease of the strength of the current of the line. 2

The accompanying drawingd represents a plan view of my improved apparatus for double transmission, showing connection of home station with distant station.

Inventor:d T. A. Edison Perd Munn & Co. Attorneys.d Witnesses:d Chas Nida.3 [P.?]e Sedgwick4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

A and B are electro magnets of equal strength and placed at equal distances from the armature lever L pivoted between them. Both magnets are arranged with seperate batteries battery MB being connected with magnet A and with its positivePage 583 pole to the line, battery .M,B’, with magnet B, being negative to the line.

Batteries MB and M,B’, are alternately placed into circuit by the action of sounder lever S.L on double spring contact a and then conducted to the earth.

The sounder keyf lever S,L is operated as usual by its battery S,B, key R 5 and magnet S.

Magnets A and B communicate over wire mm′ and the line wire with the distant station, where C is a polarized relay, to be operated by positive and negative currents, K′ a Morse key and R a Rheostat connected to key R′ and the earth at E’. The object of the key at K′ and rheostat R is, to increase and decrease the current upon the line, so as to affect the lever of the relays A,B . This increase and decrease of the current does not affect the polarized relay C , so that signals may be transmitted by the positive and negative currents of the batteries at the home station, which operate the polarized relay, while at the same time signals may be sent to the home station which are caused by the depression of key K′ and consequent effect on the relays A,B .

On the closing the sounder lever S,L, relay B and its battery M,B’, are thrown out of circuit and relay A and battery M,B with its positive polaritye to the line8 placed into the circuit. In like manner when the sounder keyf lever SL is open, relay magnetf A is thrown out of circuit, and relay magnetf B with its negative polaritye to line,h thrown into the circuit. The armature lever remains thereby constantly attracted to the electro-magnets A,B , as the instantaneous transfer of polarity permits no seperation of the same. If both positive and negative currents were passed through one magnet only, a charge and discharge would be produced with the change of polarities, and the armature would be attracted and repulsed. 6

The effect on the line is the same, whether a current of one polarity or the other is sent, but as each magnet receives a current, of the same polarity, reversal of the current takes place on the line without affecting the relays A,B. The polarized relay is self adjustable and follows the positive and negative currents, whether the tension of the batteries is suddenly increased or decreased.

The polarized relay can be placed at a number of stations on the line and each will be able to receive the signal from the transmitting station.

The simultaneous depression of the keys RKi and R’K′i at both stations produces the responding of the polarized relay,Page 584 at the distant station to the signals of the home station by reversal of the current, while the relays at the home station respond to the signals of the distant station by the decrease and increase of the strength of the current on armature lever L

Having thus described my invention

I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent.

First. The armature lever L, pivoted between relays A,B to b[e]j operated by key R′ and rheo[stat]j R from the distant station [by]j the increase and decrease [of]j the current, substantially as described.

Second. The sounder lever SL in combinationk with double spring contact a, to throw alternately the battersies MB and MB’ with reversed polarities on the line for working polarized relays at distant stations, substantially as described.

Thomas. A. Edison

Witnesses— Paul Goepel.7 T. B. Mosher8

DS and PD, MdSuFR, RG-241, Pat. App. 162,633. Petition and oath omitted. In hand of Paul Goepel. ‘Place and date taken from oath and petition. b“Case H” written in top margin. ‘Drawing and accompanying signatures from printed patent. “Preprinted. ‘Possibly “C.” Interlined above in another hand, possibly Edison’s. g“e to the line” overwritten and interlined above in another hand, possibly Edison’s. h“e to line” overwritten and interlined above in another hand, possibly Edison’s. i“K” and “K′” written in left margin. ‘Paper damaged. k“in combination” interlined above in another hand, possibly Edison’s.

1. See headnote, p. 556. After initial rejection, a significantly amended version of this application (Case H) was approved in 1875 as U.S. Patent 162,633.

2. This design is a reformulation of the group of earlier designs represented by, for example, “Duplex No 16.” in Doc. 285. It used changes of both current strength and current direction, each acting independentlyPage 585 of the other. While this design solved the problem of combining these changes for duplex transmission, it did not allow diplex, and thus quadruplex, transmission. Edison later testified that he thought up a modification to allow diplex working during his subsequent trip to England (Edison’s testimony, Testimony and Exhibits on behalf of T. A. Edison, pp. 24-25, Nicholson v. Edison). The patent resulting from Case H, as later amended, became a point of contention in the extensive legal battles over Edison’s quadruplex. Quad, passim (TAEM, reels 9 and 10).

3. Unidentified.

4. Unidentified.

5. The keys designated K and K′ in the drawing are sometimes mis-copied in this description as R or R′.

6. Cf., for example, Docs. 276, 285, and 294.

7. Unidentified.

8. Unidentified.

  • Potver of Attorney to Norman Miller

New Yowk, April 23,1873.1

I hereby appoint Norman C. Miller my attorney, sole and exclusive, to arrange, sell, bargain, transfer, convey for any sum he may see fit all my right, title and interest of every conceivable description in eight duplex telgh. patents, obtained by Munn & Co.,2 and three duplex telgh. and two compensating relay patents, obtained by L. Serrell,3 to any corporation which shall go by the name of the Western Union Telegraph Co.4

Witness: J. C. Masea.5

Thomas A. Edison.a

PD (transcript), NjWOE, Quad., 71.2, p. 12 (TAEM 10:228). ‘Followed by “M.” at bottom center.

1. Edison executed several patent applications the same day (see Doc. 317), resulting in U.S. Patents 140,488, 147,311 147,313, 147,917, 150,846, and 160,405.

2. See headnote, p. 556. Doc. 302 indicates that Edison had intended for Munn & Co. to prepare at least ten patent applications; no reason is known for the change in number.

3. The identity of these applications is uncertain. U.S. Patent 150,846 almost certainly encompasses one of the relay designs and either U.S. Patent 141,777 or 160,405 probably represents the other. One of the duplex designs is almost certainly that of U.S. Patent 147,917, but the other two duplex designs have not been identified. See Cat. 1176:51, Lab. (TAEM 6:52) for drawings of compensating relays.

4. No sale resulted and at some point this arrangement ended. In the Quadruplex Case George Harrington and others contended that Western Union’s failure to buy these patents ended Edison’s agreement with that company, but Western Union regarded this as a mere interlude in a continuing relationship. See the various lawyers’ arguments in Quad. 73.1-15 (TAEM 10:346-772).

5. Unidentified.

  • Patent Application: Automatic and Cable Telegraphy

New York, April 23, 1873a

case 82.

1b Specification describing an Improvement in Electric Telegraphs, invented by Thomas A. Edison of Newark in the County of Essex and State of New Jersey.

2 In cables and long telegraph lines, there is a limit to the speed with which perfect signals can be transmitted and received, whether the receiving instrument consists of an electromagnet, a galvanometer, a relay or a chemical telegraph instrument; this limit in speed arises from the fact that the moment the line or cable is charged by the battery being connected, a static charge is instantly set up which is in an opposite direction to the dynamic charge, and the tendency is to defer the reception of the signal at the distant station,1 and at the moment of breaking the battery connection, the static charge disperses by dividing at the center of resistance and going in both directions one part going to the ground at the transmitting station in a direction opposed to the battery, and the other part going towards the receiving instrument in the same direction as the previous current from the battery.

3 This electrical condition is of sufficient duration to render the signals unintelligable at the receiving instrument after a certain speed is attained.

4 The time of discharge is directly proportioned to the resistance at the points of discharge at the ends of the line, and the result is, that the speed of the instruments is limited to the speed with which the line will free itself through the channels aforesaid.

5 My invention relates to the discovery of a method of neutralizing the effects of the static charge in any length of line or cable by balancing the electric forces and the discovery of a point of no electric tension or zero, as regards the static charge, so that the receiving instrument when located at that point will be operated by the rise of tension produced by a pulsation that is connected at such receiving instrument and made as instantly and definitely operative as the pulsation given at the transmitting station.2

6 I obtain this point of no tension by forming at the receiving end an artificial line having an equal or nearly equal resistance and electro static capacity, or capacity for producing static charges, as that of the cable or land line, and connect this with the line or cable, and place between the cable and the artificial line the receiving instrument, which hence is in the center of resistance and static accumulation. When this Page 587 balance is obtained the signals are received perfect and the rapidity is governed only by the strength of the battery.

7 The artificial line is made with an adjustable rheostat: liquid in a tube is preferable.

8 I connect, between the receiving instrument and the earth, one or more condensers or other accumulators of static electricity, which are made adjustable by having them in sections and bringing one or more sections in or out by a switch so as to increase or decrease the static charge from the artificial cable: it may also be done by placing a very high adjustable resistance coil between one leaf of the condenser and the artificial line.

9 I maintain a very low resistance between the line and the ground at the transmitting station so as to discharge the static current at this end as rapidly as possible.

10 The mode which I prefer, is to keep my transmitting battery in circuit at all times and include in the same circuit another battery of equal power with opposite poles so that when both are in there is no current generated and the resistance of the wire to earth is no more than the resistance of the battery.

11 The transmission of a pulsation is made when the circuit is closed through the perforation in the paper or otherwise, so as to short circuit or shunt the neutralizing battery and send a current upon the line.

12 The current at the receiving paper is shunted through a resistance so as to preserve a constant and equal resistance, which the chemical receiving paper does not give, owing to being more damp in one place than another.

13 In balancing the resistance and static current, the resistance of the instrument is to be added to the line and the resistance of the two equalized by the same amount of resistance in the artificial cable or line.

14 If the receiving instrument is out of the center of resistance towards the line, the pulsations will be weakened by the static charge acting against the pulsation, but if the instrument is towards the artificial cable on the other side of the zero point, the signals or characters will be slightly prolonged owing to the static charge discharging in the same direction as the current. It is at this point that I prefer to place the instrument because by placing an electro magnet in the shunt of the receiving instrument I obtain enough counter discharge from that magnet to cut off this prolongation locally and this discharge from the magnet will not interfere with the line butPage 588 has only a local effect on the receiving instrument to prevent tailing on the chemical paper.

Fig. 1.b
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Fig. 2.
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Fig. 3.
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Inventor Thos A. Edison, per Lemuel W. Serrell atty. Witnesses Chas H Smith, Harold Serrell

15 In the drawing, Figure 1 . illustrates my invention in the form that I find most generally available. The batteries a , and b, are connected in opposite positions, the positive poles being towards each other and the negative poles connected to the ground g, and line 1. respectively.

16 The transmitting instrument c, is in a circuit d, to the Page 589 battery b, in which circuit d, is a resistance e. When the circuit d, is broken the two batteries a, b, neutralize each other and there is no charge sent on the line, but when the circuit d, is closed through a perforation in the paper, or by a key, or otherwise, the battery b, is short circuited and the battery a, being unbalanced sends a pulsation on the line. The artificial line between the receiving instrument f, and the earth g’, is made by introducing a resistance or rheostat at r , preferably a tube containing liquid with adjustable points: this rheostat is made to balance or equal, or nearly so the resistance of the line 1, and the instrument f, and the condenser s, or other accumulator of static electricity is of a capacity to about equal that of the line, hence the receiving instrument will occupy a zero or neutral point in regard to the static charge from which the static charges will discharge both ways to g, and g′.

17 The condenser or accumulator s, should be in sections to bring in a greater or less number of sections by switches.

18 When the receiving instrument is chemical, the paper isd preferably prepared by dipping it in a solution of at least one pound of iodide of potassium in one gallon of water, to which is added a small quantity of flour: this paper cannot be maintained at uniform moisture hence its resistance to the passage of electricity varies; this is compensated for by the shunt circuit t, in which is a resistance u, sufficient to direct the necessary amount of electricity to the paper to make the mark and allow the remainder to pass to the artificial line, thus the varying condition of the paper does not change the resistance of the line.

19 I have discovered that when an electro magnet is energized and the circuit broken, a pulsation is set up in the opposite direction to that passing into such magnets;3 I avail of this to prevent tailing upon the chemical paper and at v, I have shown an electro magnet for this purpose. It will be seen that this electro magnet will discharge itself within a short local circuit containing the receiving instrument, and that the reactionary current therefrom moving in the opposite direction to the main current frees the receiving instrument from the tailing caused by the discharge of static electricity, and this magnet v, may be employed in many places to effect the object before named, even when there is not an artificial line.

20 In some instances with very long lines, there may be intermediate artificial lines arranged as aforesaid or reactionary magnets with branch circuits to the earth, to either receive drop copies in such branch circuits or to free the line of static Page 590electricity and aid in obtaining the signals perfectly at the last receiving station with the greatest rapidity.

21 Figures 2 , and 3 , represent the same parts as before described but in Figure 2 , only a single battery is shown and the resistance e, is between the line and the earth to regulate the proportion of electricity sent over the line, by adjusting such rheostat to prevent too great return to the battery through such rheostat.4

22 In Figure 3 , a condenser h, is introduced in addition to this rheostat that it may react between the pulsations of electricity on the main line to aid in clearing such line of the static charge.e

I claim as my invention,—

An artificial line between the receiving instrument and the earth to balance the resistance and static charge or nearly so at both sides of the receiving instrument substantially as set forth—

Signed by me this 23rd day of April a.d. 1873.

Thos A Edison

Witnesses Geo. D. Walker. Geo. T. Pinckney Chas H Smith

DS and D (photographic transcript), MdSuFR, RG-241, Pat. App. 147,311. Oath omitted. “Place taken from oath, date taken from text of application; form of date altered. a“Section numbers written in margin in another hand. ‘Drawings and accompanying signatures from printed patent. dInterlined above. eTo this point, written by Walker; remainder of document, except signatures, written by Smith.

1. In an undated fragment, probably written prior to this patent application, Edison described the effect of the static charge in the following manner: “The transmission of waves of electricity are instantaneous no matter what is the length of the cable. The retardation noticed by electricians in cables is due to the not properly retardation but the leyden jar charge sending its current against the charging current. The same as an electromagnet placed in an electric current The first part impulse will be weakened by the counter charge against the magnetizing current.” Cat. 297:12(2), Lab. (TAEM 5:478).

2. See Doc. 299.

3. In his British patent for this invention (Brit. Pat. 1,508 [1873]) Edison added a second claim regarding this “discovery.” He called the opposite pulsation set up by the energized magnet a “reactionary discharge.”

4. The British patent (1,508) reads the same to this point. The description of the third figure is slightly different, and a fourth figure and its description were added. These changes related to Edison’s accounting for the “reactionary discharge” set up by the electromagnet.

Share