-
3. Culture and Politics at DuPont before World War II
- Johns Hopkins University Press
- Chapter
- Additional Information
t h r e e CultureandPoliticsatDuPontbefore WorldWarII Attheendofthe1930s,DuPontnolongerhadmuchincommonwithwhatit hadbeenatthebeginningofthecentury,whentheduPontcousinstookover. Thiseventhadbroughtaboutatechnicalandorganizationalmutationthat changedthecompanyfromasimpleproducerofgunpowderandexplosives intoanenterprisefocusedonthehigh-volumeconsumermarketforchemicals andapioneerinadvancedmanagementtechniques. Thismutationwenthandinhandwithachangeincustomers.TheU.S. ArmyandNavyhadbeenDuPont’sprincipalcustomersuntilWorldWarI, butwhenthecompanywentintothehigh-volumecivilianconsumermarket, productionforthemilitarydeclinedproportionally.Thisorientationwasinpart broughtaboutbythechangeinDuPont’srelationshipwiththefederalgovernment ,achangethatwentbacktotheveryfirstyearsofthenewcentury,whenthe Progressiveswerefashioninganewgovernmentthathadgreaterpowersofintervention andregulationthaninthepast.UntilWorldWarII,DuPont’srelations withthegovernmentwerefraughtwithtensionandpunctuatedbyperiodsof crisisthatbecameacuteinthefirstyearsofthenewcentury,duringWorldWar I,andparticularlyintheearly1930s,thefirstyearsoftheNewDeal. Moreover,DuPonthadtodealwiththepublic’smoraldisapproval.Articles inmajordailynewspapersstigmatizedthe“gunpowdertrust”andthe“American Krupps,”andtheseattacksbecameevenmoreprevalentafterWorldWar Iandinthe1930s.OntheeveofWorldWarII,andjustbeforetheUnited Statesdefinitivelyassumedaleadershiproleininternationalaffairs,DuPont wasthereforepoliticallyonthedefensiveandextremelyreluctanttoventure intonewprojectswiththepublicauthorities,evenifthelinesofcommunication hadbeenreopened.Thiswasbecausethecompany’sleadershadearlyon recognizedtheimportanceofdevelopingahigh-volumemarketforchemicals, whiletheNewDealforitsparthadadoptedaKeynsianperspective,inwhich consumerspendingbecameapoliticalpriorityandattacksonbigcapitalwere relinquished.The“consumer”asapoliticalconceptwasthusahighlyvisible figurewhennyloncameonthemarket;andthischronologicalconcurrence, whichcreatedasymbolicsealbetweenapoliticaleconomyandanalready famousproduct,preparedthewayforthepostwarera. Thehistorianswhohavetakenaninterestinthepoliticalactivitiesofthedu PontfamilyhaveconcentratedontheAmericanLibertyLeague,ananti-New DealassociationlaunchedwithagreatdealoffanfarebytheduPontsin1934. Theyhaverightlystressedthetrulyreactionarynatureofthisgroupandits lackofpopularsupport.1Nonetheless,thepoliticalbattlesoftheeponymous directorshavenotyetbeenintegratedintoalargerperspectivethatwould gobeyondmoralconsiderationsabouttheegoismofmillionairesandallow ustoestablishtheconnectionbetweentheprofoundconservatismofthese businessmenandthesavvyboldnessoftheirinvestmentsinhigh-volumeconsumer chemicals. TheduPontsandtheProgressiveState DuPontandFederalRegulation Asweknow,DuPontatthetimeofitsfoundinghadveryclosetiestothe Americangovernment,particularlythemilitary.Thiscloseassociationcontinued throughoutthenineteenthcentury,evenifDuPontendeavoredfromthe beginningtoexpanditsactivitiesintothecivilianmarketforblackgunpowder andexplosives.Butuntiltheearlyyearsofthetwentiethcentury,therewere noplanstoproduceanythingelsebutblackpowder,smokelesspowder,and variouskindsofdynamite.In1903,DuPontsold70percentofallthedynamite CultureandPoliticsatDuPontbeforeWorldWarII [18.189.180.76] Project MUSE (2024-04-25 09:05 GMT) NylonandBombs soldintheUnitedStates,slightlymorethan60percentoftheblackpowder, 65percentofthenitrocellulosepowders,80percentofthecannonpowder, 70percentofthepowderforhuntingrifles,and70percentofthesmokeless powder(whichwasusedalmostexclusivelybythemilitary).2Itsprofitscame essentiallyfromthesaleofdynamiteandsmokelesspowderfortheArmyand theNavy.In1905,forinstance,ofanoverallprofitof$4.88million,$1.90million camefromdynamitesalesand$1.07millionfrommilitarysmokelesspowder ,withtherestevenlydividedamongvarious...