In this Book

buy this book Buy This Book in Print
summary

For the past 200 years, Kant has acted as a lens--sometimes a distorting lens--between historians of philosophy and early modern intellectual history. Kant's writings about Descartes, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume have been so influential that it has often been difficult to see these predecessors on any terms but Kant's own. In Kant and the Early Moderns, Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse bring together some of the world's leading historians of philosophy to consider Kant in relation to these earlier thinkers.


These original essays are grouped in pairs. A first essay discusses Kant's direct engagement with the philosophical thought of Descartes, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, or Hume, while a second essay focuses more on the original ideas of these earlier philosophers, with reflections on Kant's reading from the point of view of a more direct interest in the earlier thinker in question. What emerges is a rich and complex picture of the debates that shaped the "transcendental turn" from early modern epistemology, metaphysics, and philosophy of mind to Kant's critical philosophy.


The contributors, in addition to the editors, are Jean-Marie Beyssade, Lisa Downing, Dina Emundts, Don Garrett, Paul Guyer, Anja Jauernig, Wayne Waxman, and Kenneth P. Winkler.

Table of Contents

restricted access Download Full Book
  1. Cover
  2. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Title Page, Copyright
  2. pp. i-v
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Contents
  2. pp. vii-viii
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Preface
  2. Daniel Garber, Béatrice Longuenesse
  3. pp. ix-x
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Abbreviations and References for Primary Sources
  2. pp. xi-xv
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Introduction
  2. Daniel Garber, Béatrice Longuenesse
  3. pp. 1-8
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 1. Kant’s “I Think” versus Descartes’ “I Am a Thing That Thinks”
  2. Beatrice Longuenesse
  3. pp. 9-31
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 2. Descartes’ “I Am a Thing That Thinks” versus Kant’s “I Think”
  2. Jean-Marie Beyssade
  3. pp. 32-40
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 3. Kant’s Critique of the Leibnizian Philosophy: Contra the Leibnizians, but Pro Leibniz
  2. Anja Jauernig
  3. pp. 41-63
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 4. What Leibniz Really Said?
  2. Daniel Garber
  3. pp. 64-78
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 5. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism and the Limits of Knowledge: Kant’s Alternative to Locke’s Physiology
  2. Paul Guyer
  3. pp. 79-99
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 6. The “Sensible Object” and the “Uncertain Philosophical Cause”
  2. Lisa Downing
  3. pp. 100-116
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 7. Kant’s Critique of Berkeley’s Concept of Objectivity
  2. Dina Emundts
  3. pp. 117-141
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 8. Berkeley and Kant
  2. Kenneth P. Winkler
  3. pp. 142-171
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 9. Kant’s Humean Solution to Hume’s Problem
  2. Wayne Waxman
  3. pp. 172-192
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 10. Should Hume Have Been a Transcendental Idealist?
  2. Don Garrett
  3. pp. 193-208
  4. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Notes
  2. pp. 209-240
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Bibliography
  2. pp. 241-247
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. List of Contributors
  2. pp. 249-250
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Index
  2. pp. 251-257
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.