In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

. Margolis, “How a Foe Saved the Quincy Library Group’s Bacon,” . . Associated Press, “Quincy’sTrail-Blazing Logging Plan Clears Senate Hurdle,” Sacramento Bee, October , , a. . “Boxer Caves: Switch on Logging Bill a Political Gesture,” Sacramento Bee, December , , Internet source, sec. b, Editorials, no page number. . “Sierra Nevada Forest Protection Campaign Releases New Analysis: S. — The Quincy Logging Bill—Would Log More Acres of Ancient Forest Than Headwaters ,” Business Wire, Electric Library, February , , –. . Associated Press, “Opponents: Compromise Forest Bill Could Ruin Wild Lands with Logging,” Grass Valley Union, February , , a. . Duane, “Community Participation in Ecosystem Management,” –. . usda, Forest Service, “eis for the Herger-Feinstein Quincy Library Group Forest Recovery Act Pilot Project, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement,” December , . . usda, Forest Service, Herger-Feinstein Quincy Library Group Forest Recovery Act Final Environmental Impact Statement, chap. , . . Ibid., –. . Jane Braxton Little, “A Year Later, Quincy Forest Plan Leaves Saws Mostly Quiet,” Sacramento Bee, August , , a, a. . Bradley E. Powell, Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Record of Decision (Vallejo, ca: Forest Service, R Regional Office, January ), . .Tom Philp, “Logging Directives for Sierra Don’t Jibe,” Sacramento Bee, January , , b. . For a typical comment on the resource policies of the Bush administration that also contains a summary of what the reporter labels as “Bush’s Environmental Record,” see Mark Hertsgard, “Bush’s Other War: Environment in Cross Hairs,” Sacramento Bee, February , , Forum, e–e. . For a sampling of press and environmental-group concern about Bush’s revisions , see: Stuart Leavenworth, “Battle for the Forest, Sweeping Plan May Bring More Logging,” Sacramento Bee, January , , a–a; Associated Press, “Bush Plan Leaves Forest Care to Timber Firms,” Grass Valley Union, March , , c; Zachary Cole, “White House Plan Doubles Sierra Logging,” San Francisco Chronicle, state edition, March , , a–a; Jason Swartz, “Plumas and Lassen National Forests Slated for Devastating ‘Administrative Study’ Logging Plan,” Wilderness Record, spring , . . Stuart Leavenworth, “Sierra Plan Calls for More Logging,” Sacramento Bee, June , , a–a. . Thomas is quoted and Eubanks is cited in Dave Moeller, “Higher Cut Levels on Sierra Proposed,” Grass Valley Union, June , , a. . Colburn, “Forest Policy and the Quincy Library Group,” –. . Jane Braxton Little, “New Forest Plan Leaves Owls in a Lurch,” High Country News, May , , . 330 Notes to Pages 243–245 . Tom Knudson, “Furor Grows as Drought, Fires Boost Salvage Logging of Trees,” Sacramento Bee, September , , a, a. . Tom Knudson, “President OKs Hike in Salvage Logging,” Sacramento Bee, September , , no page number. . Paul Roberts, “The Federal Chain-Saw Massacre: Clinton’s Forest Service and Clear-Cut Corruption,” Harper’s, June , –. See also Roberts, “Federal ChainSaw Massacre,” Sacramento Bee, Forum, May , , f, f. . Courtney Breen, “Forest Colors Hold Darker Meaning as Sierra Drought Enters Fourth Year,” Reno Gazette-Journal, July , , no page number. . Wuerthner, “Dimming the Range of Light,” in World of Wilderness, –. . Alex Barnum, “Republicans Blast Clinton on Forest Fire Policies,” San Francisco Chronicle, September , , a; Roberts, “Federal Chain-Saw Massacre,” Harper’s, –. . Jeffrey St. Clair, “Salvage Dreams,” Wild Forest Review , no.  (February , ): –. . Jane Braxton Little and News Service assistance, “SalvageTree Cutting Abuse Cited in Report: Some Sales Had Mostly Live Trees,” Sacramento Bee, December , , section b, no page number. . Ibid. . Barbara Barte Osborn, “Lawsuit Delays Salvage Logging Operations,” Sacramento Bee, January , , b. . This evaluation of the origin of the Framework is based on chap. , “Sierra Nevada National Forests: An Environmental History,” that I contributed to fseee, Restoring Our Forest Legacy, –. . Beesley, “Sierra Nevada National Forests,” . . usda, Forest Service, “In Brief: Sierra Nevada Framework for Conservation and Collaboration,” press release, January , , Pacific Southwest Region. . U.S. Forest Service, Sierra Nevada Framework for Conservation and Collaboration : Summary of Existing Management Direction, Executive Summary (San Francisco: Pacific Southwest Region, August , ), . . G. Lynn Sprague, Regional Forester, “Improving Conservation Options for National Forests in the Sierra Nevada,” usda, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region , r, May , . . Beesley, “Sierra Nevada National Forests,” –; usda, Forest Service, Sierra Nevada Science Review: Report of the Science Review Team Charged to Synthesize New Information of Rangewide Urgency to the National Forests of the Sierra Nevada (San Francisco: Pacific Southwest Research Station, July , ), –. . Editorial, San Francisco Chronicle, May , , a. See also Tom Knudson, “Forest Draft Unveiled for Sierra Land,” Sacramento Bee, May , , a, a. . usda, Forest Service, Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment: Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Summary (Vallejo, ca: Pacific Southwest Region, April ), –; usda, Forest Service, “Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment deis: Public Comment and Public Meeting Schedule,” Pacific Southwest Region, Vallejo, Notes to Pages 245–251 331 [3.139.70.131...

Share