In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

199 Notes Introduction 1. Tahara-chō Bunkazai Hogo Shingikai, ed., Tahara-han nikki, vol. 8 (Aichi Pref., Tahara-chō, 1995), pp. 124–125, 142–143; Tahara-chō Bunkazai Chōsakai, ed., Tahara-chō shi, chūkan (Aichi Pref., Tahara-chō, 1975), pp. 1194–1195. 2. Tokugawa jikki, ed. Kuroita Katsumi, 9 vols., in Shintei zōhō Kokushi taikei series, vols. 38–47 (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1964); Shintei Kansei chōshū shokafu , 26 vols. (Tokyo: Zoku Gunsho Ruijū Kanseikai, 1964–1967). 3. The ending date of the Warring States era varies considerably in historiography , ranging from Oda Nobunaga’s entry into Kyoto in 1568, through Hideyoshi’s 1590 defeat of the last lords in Japan willing to resist him, and Ieyasu’s 1600 defeat of partisans of Hideyoshi’s son, on up to the 1615 defeat of Hideyoshi’s son Hideyori by Ieyasu. Each date has a logic to it, but for the purposes of this book the 1590 creation of an order incorporating all daimyo seems most appropriate. 4. Ozawa Eiichi, “Bakuhanseika ni okeru hōken, gunken ron josetsu,” Tōkyō Gakugeidai kiyō, 3 bumon shakai kagaku 24 (1972): 111–128. A good summary of this understanding of the early modern order is laid out in Fujii Jōji, “Jūnana seiki no Nihon: Buke no kokka no keisei,” in vol. 12 of Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi, ed. Asao Naohiro et al. (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1994), pp. 1–64. Also see Mizubayashi Takeshi, Hōkensei no saihen to Nihonteki shakai no kakuritsu (Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppan, 1987), which has been influential in my own thought. 5. The classics in the field are Fujino Tamotsu, Bakuhan taisei shi no kenkyū, 3rd ed. (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1967); Kitajima Masamoto, Edo bakufu no kenryōku kōzō (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1964); and Conrad Totman, Politics in the Tokugawa Bakufu, 1600–1843 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967). 6. TakagiShōsakuhasexploredthedivisionofomoteandnaishōcommunicationroutesbetweendaimyoandtheTokugawaastheywerebeingcreatedintheearlyto mid-seventeenthcenturyinchapter3ofhisEdobakufunoseidotodentatsumonjo(Tokyo: notes to pages 8–13 200 KadokawaShoten,1999).KasayaKazuhikohasdescribedinformationnetworksbetween daimyoinhisEdoorusuiyaku:Kinseinogaikōkan(Tokyo:YoshikawaKōbunkan,2000). 7. I am influenced here strongly by Watanabe Hiroshi’s essay “Goikō to shōchō” in his Higashi Ajia no ōken to shisō (Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 1997). 8. Anne Walthall, “Japanese Gimin: Peasant Martyrs in Popular Memory,” American Historical Review 91, no. 5 (December 1986): 1076–1102; Irwin Scheiner, “Benevolent Lords and Honorable Peasants,” in Japanese Thought in the Tokugawa Period, 1600–1868: Methods and Metaphors, ed. Tetsuo Najita and Irwin Scheiner (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), pp. 39–62. 9. Ernest Renan, Oeuvres complètes de Ernest Renan, vol. 1 (Paris: CalmannL évy, 1947); Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism, rev. ed. (London: Verso, 1991); Eric Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992); Prasenjit Duara, Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995). 10. Mary Elizabeth Berry, Japan in Print: Information and Nation in the Early Modern Period (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007). 11. Luke Roberts, Mercantilism in a Japanese Domain: The Merchant Origins of Economic Nationalism in 18th-Century Tosa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998). 12. David Lowenthal, The Past Is a Foreign Country (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985). 13. These points are made by Watanabe Hiroshi in the introduction of his Higashi Ajia no ōken to shisō. For an English translation of Watanabe’s introduction, see his “About Some Japanese Historical Terms,” trans. Luke Roberts, Sino-Japanese Studies 10, no. 2 (1998): 32–42. 14. Margaret Mehl, History and the State in Nineteenth-Century Japan (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998), pp. 1–6. For a thoughtful and fascinating exploration of how nationalism has transformed the modes and content of history in Jordan, see Andrew Shryock, Nationalism and the Genealogical Imagination: Oral History and Textual Authority in Tribal Jordan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997). 15. Kanai Madoka, Hansei (Tokyo: Shibundō, 1962), pp. 74–75. 16. David Howell, Geographies of Identity in Nineteenth-Century Japan (Berkeley : University of California Press, 2005). 17. Katsumata Shizuo with Martin Collcutt, “The Development of Sengoku Law,” in Japan before Tokugawa: Political Consolidation and Economic Growth, 1500–1650, ed. John W. Hall, Nagahara Keiji, and Kōzō Yamamura (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981). 18. Fujita Teiichirō, Kinsei keizai shisō no kenkyū—kokueki shisō to bakuhan taisei (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1966). See Miyamoto’s insightful commentary [18.116.239.195] Project MUSE (2024...

Share